165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28138925)
1. Too many cooks…?
Curzon M; Roberts J; Toumba J
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2017 Feb; 18(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 28138925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A Reminder of the Criteria for Authorship.
Gaddis GM
J Emerg Med; 2018 Sep; 55(3):421-422. PubMed ID: 30077366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Author Modifications of Accepted Manuscripts and Galley Proofs: Sharing of Ideas on the Issue.
Wiwanitkit V
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):W59. PubMed ID: 27809559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. You're a published author!
Tompkins O
AAOHN J; 2010 Aug; 58(8):315. PubMed ID: 20812397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Whose article is it anyway?
Larkin M
Lancet; 1999 Jul; 354(9173):136. PubMed ID: 10408500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific discourse, corporate ghostwriting, journal policy, and public trust.
Tierney WM; Gerrity MS
J Gen Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 20(6):550-1. PubMed ID: 15987334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A matter of trust: introducing the journal scientific integrity policy.
McDonald JM; Eisemann MG; Cox AE
Am J Pathol; 2007 Jul; 171(1):1. PubMed ID: 17591946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Handling manuscript rejection: insights from evidence and experience.
Woolley KL; Barron JP
Chest; 2009 Feb; 135(2):573-577. PubMed ID: 19201723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific dialogue: vestige of the past or hope for the future?
Kressel HY
Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 21222291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Ghostwriting].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 May; 128(9):1039. PubMed ID: 18451881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. If it's too good to be true, it probably is.
Kennedy MS
Am J Nurs; 2009 Dec; 109(12):7. PubMed ID: 19935148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dear BPEX authors, reviewers, editorial board, and readers.
Brandan MA; Jeraj R; Wohland T
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38712862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Tidsskriftet, peer review and medical publishing].
Bjørheim J; Frich JC; Gjersvik P; Jacobsen G; Swensen E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16397649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Publication ethics and scientific misconduct: the role of authors.
Luther F
J Orthod; 2008 Mar; 35(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18287388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Not Available].
Weber MA
Rofo; 2024 May; 196(5):437-439. PubMed ID: 38387477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The journal numbers game.
Oh VM
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2006 Dec; 35(12):846-7. PubMed ID: 17218993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Extension of US trade embargoes to science editing.
Habibzadeh F
Lancet; 2004 Apr; 363(9415):1160. PubMed ID: 15064039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Should editorials in peer-reviewed journals be signed?
Smith PJ; Alexander GC; Siegler M
Chest; 2006 Jun; 129(6):1395-6. PubMed ID: 16778248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. New guidelines for authors.
Westhoff C; Bowen T
Contraception; 2013 Jul; 88(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 23773526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [The journals must honestly tell who is doing the job].
Bergström R
Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1406-7. PubMed ID: 18574981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
