These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. In the spirit of full disclosure. Irwin RS Chest; 2006 Jun; 129(6):1395. PubMed ID: 16778249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Authorship and co-authorship]. Haug C Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Accessibility to editorial information in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery journals: The authors' point of view. Castelo-Baz P; Leira-Feijoo Y; Seoane-Romero JM; Varela-Centelles P; Seoane J J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 43(7):1078-81. PubMed ID: 26143686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Too much of a good thing…. Julian T J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Oct; 17(4):371. PubMed ID: 24077310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Integrity in publishing: update on policies and statements on authorship, duplicate publications, and conflict of interest. Yoshikawa TT; Ouslander JG J Am Geriatr Soc; 2007 Feb; 55(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 17302649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Footnotes, acknowledgments, and authorship: toward greater responsibility, accountability, and transparency. Liesegang TJ; Bartley GB Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 158(6):1103-4. PubMed ID: 25457700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. 'Two Minds with but a Single Thought …'. Heinemann MK; Beyersdorf F Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1543-4. PubMed ID: 27185861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Peer review: a view based on recent experience as an author and reviewer. Clark RK Br Dent J; 2012 Aug; 213(4):153-4. PubMed ID: 22918342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Some suggestions for reviewers and for authors to know what reviewers may be looking for. Schumacher HR; Von Feldt JM J Clin Rheumatol; 2014 Aug; 20(5):241-3. PubMed ID: 25057739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. On peer review. Schuklenk U Bioethics; 2015 Feb; 29(2):ii-iii. PubMed ID: 25586285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Peer review. Suggesting or excluding reviewers can help get your paper published. Grimm D Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5743):1974. PubMed ID: 16179438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Do it right the first time: advice for cornea authors. Sugar A; Sugar J; Schwab I; Perry H; de Luise V; Soong HK; Weiss J Cornea; 2014 Sep; 33(9):879. PubMed ID: 25062337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of differences between peer reviewers suggested by authors and by editors. Cummings P JAMA; 2006 Sep; 296(10):1231; author reply 1231-2. PubMed ID: 16968843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Dealing with editorial misconduct: what about relationship with reviewers and authors? Laube RE BMJ; 2005 Feb; 330(7487):364. PubMed ID: 15705711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]