These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28139078)

  • 41. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dental porcelain.
    Barrett AA; Grimaudo NJ; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 12488851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Two years survivability of VITA 3D master shade matching guides after disinfection with isopropyl alcohol: An
    Hombesh MN; Praveen B; Sinha HV; Prasanna BG; Sachin B; Chandrashekar S
    J Conserv Dent; 2019; 22(3):275-280. PubMed ID: 31367113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Estimation of visual shade matching errors with 2 shade guides.
    Oh WS; Koh IW; O'Brien WJ
    Quintessence Int; 2009; 40(10):833-6. PubMed ID: 19898714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Dental Shade Matching and Value Discernment Abilities of First-Year Dental Students.
    Imbery TA; Tran D; Baechle MA; Hankle JL; Janus C
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Dec; 27(9):821-827. PubMed ID: 29533495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparing the effectiveness of shade measurement by intraoral scanner, digital spectrophotometer, and visual shade assessment.
    Czigola A; Róth I; Vitai V; Fehér D; Hermann P; Borbély J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Dec; 33(8):1166-1174. PubMed ID: 34397163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparison between conventional visual and spectrophotometric methods for shade selection.
    Judeh A; Al-Wahadni A
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):e69-79. PubMed ID: 19862392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Color-Matching and Blending-Effect of Universal Shade Bulk-Fill-Resin-Composite in Resin-Composite-Models and Natural Teeth.
    Abdelraouf RM; Habib NA
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():4183432. PubMed ID: 27843942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of ocular dominance, clinical experience, and sex on the accuracy of shade selection.
    Garg A; Raura N; Arora A; Shenoy R; Thomas M
    Quintessence Int; 2022 Mar; 53(4):320-327. PubMed ID: 34927404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A Clinical Study Comparing the Maxillary Anterior Tooth Shade and Fabricated Crown Shade of the Western Uttar Pradesh Population to Commercial Shade Guides.
    Sinha T; Ranjan M; Chatterjee U; Sinha DK; Chaudhary A; Vijayan A
    Cureus; 2023 Mar; 15(3):e35719. PubMed ID: 37025718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison between visual and instrumental methods for natural tooth shade matching.
    Pimental W; Tiossi R
    Gen Dent; 2014; 62(6):47-9. PubMed ID: 25369386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Application and comparison of two shade guide training systems].
    Liu F; Xu TK; Xu MM; Feng HL; Song GY
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 44(11):645-8. PubMed ID: 20079262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Comparative analysis of some factors in tooth color matching].
    Török J; Mauks L; Márton S; Hegedűs C
    Fogorv Sz; 2014 Sep; 107(3):79-86. PubMed ID: 25509508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Lightness, chroma and hue differences on visual shade matching.
    Pecho OE; Pérez MM; Ghinea R; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1362-1373. PubMed ID: 27614615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Differences in color between fired porcelain and shade guides.
    Groh CL; O'Brien WJ; Boenke KM
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(6):510-4. PubMed ID: 1307009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [The influence of toothguide training box on shade matching veracity].
    Xu MM; Xu TK; Liu F; Shi XR; Feng HL
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2009 Aug; 18(4):432-5. PubMed ID: 19760022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Difference in illuminant-dependent color changes of shade guide tabs by the shade designation relative to three illuminants.
    Cha HS; Lee YK
    Am J Dent; 2009 Dec; 22(6):350-6. PubMed ID: 20178211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [The investigation of color selection of 4340 cases of ceramic restorations].
    Guo H; Wang F; Feng H; Gou X; Li K; Wu T; Yao C
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Jun; 18(3):174-7. PubMed ID: 12539671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Accuracy of Three Shade-matching Devices in Replicating the Shade of Metal Ceramic Restorations: An in vitro Study.
    Lakhanpal S; Neelima MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1003-1008. PubMed ID: 27965487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. New shade guide for evaluation of tooth whitening--colorimetric study.
    Paravina RD; Johnston WM; Powers JM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):276-83; discussion 283. PubMed ID: 17877628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas.
    Pecho OE; Ghinea R; Alessandretti R; Pérez MM; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 26631341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.