128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28139085)
1. Improving the Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Medical Devices.
Tarricone R; Callea G; Ogorevc M; Prevolnik Rupel V
Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():70-92. PubMed ID: 28139085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Challenges in the Assessment of Medical Devices: The MedtecHTA Project.
Tarricone R; Torbica A; Drummond M
Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():5-12. PubMed ID: 28139084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Key Recommendations from the MedtecHTA Project.
Tarricone R; Torbica A; Drummond M;
Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():145-152. PubMed ID: 28139086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intrinsic properties of medical devices: considerations for economic evaluation.
Basu R; Eggington S
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2019 Dec; 19(6):619-626. PubMed ID: 31721598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Linking the Regulatory and Reimbursement Processes for Medical Devices: The Need for Integrated Assessments.
Ciani O; Wilcher B; van Giessen A; Taylor RS
Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():13-29. PubMed ID: 28139087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterising Uncertainty in the Assessment of Medical Devices and Determining Future Research Needs.
Rothery C; Claxton K; Palmer S; Epstein D; Tarricone R; Sculpher M
Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():109-123. PubMed ID: 28139090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Organisational impact: Definition and assessment methods for medical devices.
Roussel C; Carbonneil C; Audry A;
Therapie; 2016 Feb; 71(1):69-96. PubMed ID: 27080633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.
Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
Value Health; 2013; 16(2):231-50. PubMed ID: 23538175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A review of the economic tools for assessing new medical devices.
Craig JA; Carr L; Hutton J; Glanville J; Iglesias CP; Sims AJ
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2015 Feb; 13(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 25139635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adoption Decisions for Medical Devices in the Field of Cardiology: Results from a European Survey.
Hatz MH; Schreyögg J; Torbica A; Boriani G; Blankart CR
Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():124-144. PubMed ID: 28139093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Economic evaluation approaches for new technology.
Papatheofanis FJ
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2003; 22(3):16-7. PubMed ID: 12845811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Role of Learning in Health Technology Assessments: An Empirical Assessment of Endovascular Aneurysm Repairs in German Hospitals.
Varabyova Y; Blankart CR; Schreyögg J
Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():93-108. PubMed ID: 28139092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical studies of innovative medical devices: what level of evidence for hospital-based health technology assessment?
Boudard A; Martelli N; Prognon P; Pineau J
J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 23510375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Treatment of Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Health Technology Assessment.
Health Quality Ontario
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2016; 16(19):1-94. PubMed ID: 27990197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical electronics: buy now.
European Coordination Committee of Radiological and Electromedical Manufacturers
Med Device Technol; 2003 Jun; 14(5):37. PubMed ID: 12852124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Review of Economic Submissions to NICE Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme.
Alshreef A; Jenks M; Green W; Dixon S
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Dec; 14(6):623-634. PubMed ID: 27480537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The economic evaluation of medical devices: challenges.
Kingkaew P; Teerawattananon Y
J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 May; 97 Suppl 5():S102-7. PubMed ID: 24964706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment and non-clinical impact of medical devices.
Dervaux B; Szwarcensztein K; Josseran A; ; Barna A; Carbonneil C; Chevrie K; Debroucker F; Grumblat A; Grumel O; Massol J; Maugendre P; Méchin H; Orlikowski D; Roussel C; Rumeau-Pichon C; Sales JP; Vicaut E
Therapie; 2015; 70(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 25747839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MEDICAL DEVICE PRICES IN ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS.
Akpinar I; Jacobs P; Husereau D
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(1-2):86-9. PubMed ID: 25989920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
