376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28139087)
1. Linking the Regulatory and Reimbursement Processes for Medical Devices: The Need for Integrated Assessments.
Ciani O; Wilcher B; van Giessen A; Taylor RS
Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():13-29. PubMed ID: 28139087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Key Recommendations from the MedtecHTA Project.
Tarricone R; Torbica A; Drummond M;
Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():145-152. PubMed ID: 28139086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Challenges in the Assessment of Medical Devices: The MedtecHTA Project.
Tarricone R; Torbica A; Drummond M
Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():5-12. PubMed ID: 28139084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adoption Decisions for Medical Devices in the Field of Cardiology: Results from a European Survey.
Hatz MH; Schreyögg J; Torbica A; Boriani G; Blankart CR
Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():124-144. PubMed ID: 28139093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Health technology assessment of medical devices: a survey of non-European union agencies.
Ciani O; Wilcher B; Blankart CR; Hatz M; Rupel VP; Erker RS; Varabyova Y; Taylor RS
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(3):154-65. PubMed ID: 26044729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving the Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Medical Devices.
Tarricone R; Callea G; Ogorevc M; Prevolnik Rupel V
Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():70-92. PubMed ID: 28139085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. HTA of medical devices: Challenges and ideas for the future from a European perspective.
Fuchs S; Olberg B; Panteli D; Perleth M; Busse R
Health Policy; 2017 Mar; 121(3):215-229. PubMed ID: 27751533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Health technology assessment for medical devices in Europe. What must be considered.
Siebert M; Clauss LC; Carlisle M; Casteels B; de Jong P; Kreuzer M; Sanghera S; Stokoe G; Trueman P; Lang AW;
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(3):733-40. PubMed ID: 12391964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health Technology Assessment: managing the introduction and use of medical devices in clinical practice in Italy.
Migliore A; Ratti M; Cerbo M; Jefferson T
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2009 May; 6(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 19419283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical electronics: buy now.
European Coordination Committee of Radiological and Electromedical Manufacturers
Med Device Technol; 2003 Jun; 14(5):37. PubMed ID: 12852124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT METHODS GUIDELINES FOR MEDICAL DEVICES: HOW CAN WE ADDRESS THE GAPS? THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE.
Polisena J; Castaldo R; Ciani O; Federici C; Borsci S; Ritrovato M; Clark D; Pecchia L
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(3):276-289. PubMed ID: 29909792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health Technology Assessment for Molecular Diagnostics: Practices, Challenges, and Recommendations from the Medical Devices and Diagnostics Special Interest Group.
Garfield S; Polisena J; S Spinner D; Postulka A; Y Lu C; Tiwana SK; Faulkner E; Poulios N; Zah V; Longacre M
Value Health; 2016; 19(5):577-87. PubMed ID: 27565275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are current clinical studies on artificial intelligence-based medical devices comprehensive enough to support a full health technology assessment? A systematic review.
Farah L; Davaze-Schneider J; Martin T; Nguyen P; Borget I; Martelli N
Artif Intell Med; 2023 Jun; 140():102547. PubMed ID: 37210155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical studies of innovative medical devices: what level of evidence for hospital-based health technology assessment?
Boudard A; Martelli N; Prognon P; Pineau J
J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 23510375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing medical devices: a qualitative study from the validate perspective.
Bloemen B; Oortwijn W
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2024 Apr; 40(1):e29. PubMed ID: 38654522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment and non-clinical impact of medical devices.
Dervaux B; Szwarcensztein K; Josseran A; ; Barna A; Carbonneil C; Chevrie K; Debroucker F; Grumblat A; Grumel O; Massol J; Maugendre P; Méchin H; Orlikowski D; Roussel C; Rumeau-Pichon C; Sales JP; Vicaut E
Therapie; 2015; 70(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 25747839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing a new taxonomic model for the assessment of medical devices: Is it plausible and applicable? Insights from HTA reports and interviews with HTA institutions in Europe.
Fuchs S; Olberg B; Perleth M; Busse R; Panteli D
Health Policy; 2019 Feb; 123(2):173-181. PubMed ID: 29703653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Review of Economic Submissions to NICE Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme.
Alshreef A; Jenks M; Green W; Dixon S
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Dec; 14(6):623-634. PubMed ID: 27480537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of HTA and procurement practices on the selection and prices of medical devices.
Callea G; Armeni P; Marsilio M; Jommi C; Tarricone R
Soc Sci Med; 2017 Feb; 174():89-95. PubMed ID: 28013109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
