These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28139093)

  • 1. Adoption Decisions for Medical Devices in the Field of Cardiology: Results from a European Survey.
    Hatz MH; Schreyögg J; Torbica A; Boriani G; Blankart CR
    Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():124-144. PubMed ID: 28139093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linking the Regulatory and Reimbursement Processes for Medical Devices: The Need for Integrated Assessments.
    Ciani O; Wilcher B; van Giessen A; Taylor RS
    Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():13-29. PubMed ID: 28139087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenges in the Assessment of Medical Devices: The MedtecHTA Project.
    Tarricone R; Torbica A; Drummond M
    Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():5-12. PubMed ID: 28139084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Key Recommendations from the MedtecHTA Project.
    Tarricone R; Torbica A; Drummond M;
    Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():145-152. PubMed ID: 28139086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
    Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterising Uncertainty in the Assessment of Medical Devices and Determining Future Research Needs.
    Rothery C; Claxton K; Palmer S; Epstein D; Tarricone R; Sculpher M
    Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():109-123. PubMed ID: 28139090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health technology assessment for medical devices in Europe. What must be considered.
    Siebert M; Clauss LC; Carlisle M; Casteels B; de Jong P; Kreuzer M; Sanghera S; Stokoe G; Trueman P; Lang AW;
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(3):733-40. PubMed ID: 12391964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT METHODS GUIDELINES FOR MEDICAL DEVICES: HOW CAN WE ADDRESS THE GAPS? THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE.
    Polisena J; Castaldo R; Ciani O; Federici C; Borsci S; Ritrovato M; Clark D; Pecchia L
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(3):276-289. PubMed ID: 29909792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors influencing coverage decisions on medical devices: A retrospective analysis of 78 medical device appraisals for the Austrian hospital benefit catalogue 2008-2015.
    Kisser A; Tüchler H; Erdös J; Wild C
    Health Policy; 2016 Aug; 120(8):903-12. PubMed ID: 27344197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. TAXONOMY OF MEDICAL DEVICES IN THE LOGIC OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.
    Henschke C; Panteli D; Perleth M; Busse R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(5):324-30. PubMed ID: 26711471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decisions to adopt new technologies at the hospital level: insights from Israeli medical centers.
    Greenberg D; Peterburg Y; Vekstein D; Pliskin JS
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 15921062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health technology assessment of medical devices: a survey of non-European union agencies.
    Ciani O; Wilcher B; Blankart CR; Hatz M; Rupel VP; Erker RS; Varabyova Y; Taylor RS
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(3):154-65. PubMed ID: 26044729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence, appropriateness, and technology assessment in cardiology: a case study of computed tomography.
    Redberg RF
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 17211017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of technology assessment in health benefits coverage for medical devices.
    Braslow NM; Shatin D; McCarthy DB; Newcomer LN
    Am J Manag Care; 1998 Sep; 4 Spec No():SP139-50. PubMed ID: 10185990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical studies of innovative medical devices: what level of evidence for hospital-based health technology assessment?
    Boudard A; Martelli N; Prognon P; Pineau J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 23510375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Medical Devices.
    Tarricone R; Callea G; Ogorevc M; Prevolnik Rupel V
    Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():70-92. PubMed ID: 28139085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Health Technology Assessment: managing the introduction and use of medical devices in clinical practice in Italy.
    Migliore A; Ratti M; Cerbo M; Jefferson T
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2009 May; 6(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 19419283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health technology assessment (HTA): a brief introduction of history and the current status in the field of cardiology under the economic crisis.
    Fanourgiakis J; Kanoupakis E
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Aug; 8(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 26291523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing medical devices: a qualitative study from the validate perspective.
    Bloemen B; Oortwijn W
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2024 Apr; 40(1):e29. PubMed ID: 38654522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Device costs go under the knife. With four hospitals having won HHS' approval for gain-sharing to shave supply costs, some observers say it's just the beginning.
    Becker C
    Mod Healthc; 2005 Feb; 35(8):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 15765835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.