These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28139144)

  • 1. Embedded performance validity testing in neuropsychological assessment: Potential clinical tools.
    Rickards TA; Cranston CC; Touradji P; Bechtold KT
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2018; 25(3):219-230. PubMed ID: 28139144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differentiating poor validity from probable impairment on the medical symptom validity test: a cross-validation study.
    Morin RT; Axelrod BN; Reslan S; Schutte C
    Int J Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 129(3):217-224. PubMed ID: 30234402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Embedded performance validity indicators within the California Verbal Learning Test, Children's Version.
    Baker DA; Connery AK; Kirk JW; Kirkwood MW
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2014; 28(1):116-27. PubMed ID: 24229006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Embedded Performance Validity Measures with Postdeployment Veterans: Cross-Validation and Efficiency with Multiple Measures.
    Shura RD; Miskey HM; Rowland JA; Yoash-Gantz RE; Denning JH
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2016; 23(2):94-104. PubMed ID: 26375185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance validity testing in children and adolescents: A descriptive study comparing direct and embedded measures.
    Weiss SJ; Blackwell MC; Griffith KM; Jordan LS; Culotta VP
    Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2019; 8(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 29286844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Malingering assessment: evaluation of validity of performance.
    Vanderploeg RD; Curtiss G
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 11790911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of credible patients of very low intelligence and non-credible patients on neurocognitive performance validity indicators.
    Smith K; Boone K; Victor T; Miora D; Cottingham M; Ziegler E; Zeller M; Wright M
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2014; 28(6):1048-70. PubMed ID: 24985490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Formula: see text]Neuropsychologists' Validity Testing Beliefs and Practices: A Survey of North American Professionals.
    Martin PK; Schroeder RW; Odland AP
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2015; 29(6):741-76. PubMed ID: 26390099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A survey of neuropsychologists' use of validity tests with children and adolescents.
    Brooks BL; Ploetz DM; Kirkwood MW
    Child Neuropsychol; 2016; 22(8):1001-20. PubMed ID: 26295363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of performance and symptom validity testing with pediatric populations.
    Kirk JW; Baker DA; Kirk JJ; MacAllister WS
    Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2020; 9(4):292-306. PubMed ID: 32372667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CVLT-II Forced Choice Recognition Trial as an Embedded Validity Indicator: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.
    Schwartz ES; Erdodi L; Rodriguez N; Ghosh JJ; Curtain JR; Flashman LA; Roth RM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2016 Sep; 22(8):851-8. PubMed ID: 27619108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-validation of three Advanced Clinical Solutions performance validity tests: Examining combinations of measures to maximize classification of invalid performance.
    Bain KM; Soble JR; Webber TA; Messerly JM; Bailey KC; Kirton JW; McCoy KJM
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2021; 28(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 30987451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury.
    Frederick RI; Bowden SC
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 19333066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting performance invalidity in children: not quite as easy as A, B, C, 1, 2, 3 but automatized sequences appears promising.
    Kirkwood MW; Connery AK; Kirk JW; Baker DA
    Child Neuropsychol; 2014 Mar; 20(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 23297668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Symptom validity and neuropsychological assessment: a survey of practices and beliefs of neuropsychologists in six European countries.
    Dandachi-FitzGerald B; Ponds RW; Merten T
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 Dec; 28(8):771-83. PubMed ID: 24047545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance Validity Testing in Neuropsychology: Scientific Basis and Clinical Application-A Brief Review.
    Greher MR; Wodushek TR
    J Psychiatr Pract; 2017 Mar; 23(2):134-140. PubMed ID: 28291039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Red flags in the clinical interview may forecast invalid neuropsychological testing.
    Keesler ME; McClung K; Meredith-Duliba T; Williams K; Swirsky-Sacchetti T
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Apr; 31(3):619-631. PubMed ID: 27846775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance validity in undergraduate research participants: a comparison of failure rates across tests and cutoffs.
    An KY; Kaploun K; Erdodi LA; Abeare CA
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):193-206. PubMed ID: 27687709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical myths of forensic neuropsychology.
    Greiffenstein MF
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Feb; 23(2):286-96. PubMed ID: 18609338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Classification accuracy of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Effort Index (EI) and Effort Scale (ES) relative to the Test Of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in a mixed clinical sample.
    Riordan P; Lahr G
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2020; 27(1):82-86. PubMed ID: 30183428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.