These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28139164)

  • 1. Toward a Choice-Based Judgment Bias Task for Horses.
    Hintze S; Roth E; Bachmann I; Würbel H
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2017; 20(2):123-136. PubMed ID: 28139164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring Cognitive Judgement Bias in Rats Using the Ambiguous-Cue Interpretation Test.
    Papciak J; Rygula R
    Curr Protoc Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 78():9.57.1-9.57.22. PubMed ID: 28046201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cross-species judgement bias task: integrating active trial initiation into a spatial Go/No-go task.
    Hintze S; Melotti L; Colosio S; Bailoo JD; Boada-Saña M; Würbel H; Murphy E
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):5104. PubMed ID: 29572529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pavlovian influences on learning differ between rats and mice in a counter-balanced Go/NoGo judgement bias task.
    Jones S; Paul ES; Dayan P; Robinson ESJ; Mendl M
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jul; 331():214-224. PubMed ID: 28549647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Housing conditions affect rat responses to two types of ambiguity in a reward-reward discrimination cognitive bias task.
    Parker RM; Paul ES; Burman OH; Browne WJ; Mendl M
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Nov; 274():73-83. PubMed ID: 25106739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technology or ecology? New tools to assess cognitive judgement bias in mice.
    Krakenberg V; Woigk I; Garcia Rodriguez L; Kästner N; Kaiser S; Sachser N; Richter SH
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 362():279-287. PubMed ID: 30654122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do horses with poor welfare show 'pessimistic' cognitive biases?
    Henry S; Fureix C; Rowberry R; Bateson M; Hausberger M
    Naturwissenschaften; 2017 Feb; 104(1-2):8. PubMed ID: 28083632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of cognitive bias as a welfare tool in poultry.
    Košťál Ľ; Skalná Z; Pichová K
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Aug; 98(Supplement_1):S63-S79. PubMed ID: 32016360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emotional state and personality influence cognitive flexibility in horses (Equus caballus).
    Fortin M; Valenchon M; Lévy F; Calandreau L; Arnould C; Lansade L
    J Comp Psychol; 2018 May; 132(2):130-140. PubMed ID: 29517248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Way Humans Behave Modulates the Emotional State of Piglets.
    Brajon S; Laforest JP; Schmitt O; Devillers N
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133408. PubMed ID: 26244335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Making Decisions under Ambiguity: Judgment Bias Tasks for Assessing Emotional State in Animals.
    Roelofs S; Boleij H; Nordquist RE; van der Staay FJ
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2016; 10():119. PubMed ID: 27375454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring judgement bias and emotional reactivity in sheep following long-term exposure to unpredictable and aversive events.
    Doyle RE; Lee C; Deiss V; Fisher AD; Hinch GN; Boissy A
    Physiol Behav; 2011 Mar; 102(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 21236279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A "How-To" Guide for Designing Judgment Bias Studies to Assess Captive Animal Welfare.
    Bethell EJ
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2015; 18 Suppl 1():S18-42. PubMed ID: 26440495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cancer blues? A promising judgment bias task indicates pessimism in nude mice with tumors.
    Resasco A; MacLellan A; Ayala MA; Kitchenham L; Edwards AM; Lam S; Dejardin S; Mason G
    Physiol Behav; 2021 Sep; 238():113465. PubMed ID: 34029586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural correlates of valence generalization in an affective conditioning paradigm.
    Schick A; Adam R; Vollmayr B; Kuehner C; Kanske P; Wessa M
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 292():147-56. PubMed ID: 26057359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognition and learning in horses (Equus caballus): What we know and why we should ask more.
    Brubaker L; Udell MA
    Behav Processes; 2016 May; 126():121-31. PubMed ID: 27018202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increased latencies to respond in a judgment bias test are not associated with pessimistic biases in rats.
    Barker TH; Howarth GS; Whittaker AL
    Behav Processes; 2018 Jan; 146():64-66. PubMed ID: 29199110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responses of mink to auditory stimuli: prerequisites for applying the 'cognitive bias' approach.
    Svendsen PM; Malmkvist J; Halekoh U; Mendl M
    Behav Processes; 2012 Nov; 91(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 23026144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex differences in performance on a cognitive bias task in Norway rats.
    Brown GR; Cullum P; Martin S; Healy SD
    Behav Processes; 2016 Dec; 133():52-55. PubMed ID: 27836736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time-scale-invariant information-theoretic contingencies in discrimination learning.
    Kalmbach A; Chun E; Taylor K; Gallistel CR; Balsam PD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(3):280-289. PubMed ID: 31021132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.