These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28141836)

  • 21. Perception based method for the investigation of audiovisual integration of speech.
    Huhn Z; Szirtes G; Lorincz A; Csépe V
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Nov; 465(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 19733215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
    Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [N100m findings of auditory-evoked fields in patients with psychogenic hearing impairment].
    Sakamoto M; Itasaka Y; Ishikawa K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2007 Oct; 110(10):672-9. PubMed ID: 18018595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Time course of early audiovisual interactions during speech and nonspeech central auditory processing: a magnetoencephalography study.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):259-74. PubMed ID: 18510440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Early and late beta-band power reflect audiovisual perception in the McGurk illusion.
    Roa Romero Y; Senkowski D; Keil J
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2342-50. PubMed ID: 25568160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in patients with right hemisphere language dominance.
    Suzuki K; Okuda J; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Hatanaka K; Yamadori A; Fujii T; Yoshimoto T
    Neuroreport; 1997 Oct; 8(15):3363-6. PubMed ID: 9351673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cortical differentiation of speech and nonspeech sounds at 100 ms: implications for dyslexia.
    Parviainen T; Helenius P; Salmelin R
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Jul; 15(7):1054-63. PubMed ID: 15563727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Seeing speech: visual information from lip movements modifies activity in the human auditory cortex.
    Sams M; Aulanko R; Hämäläinen M; Hari R; Lounasmaa OV; Lu ST; Simola J
    Neurosci Lett; 1991 Jun; 127(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 1881611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Responsiveness of the human auditory cortex to degraded speech sounds: reduction of amplitude resolution vs. additive noise.
    Miettinen I; Alku P; Salminen N; May PJ; Tiitinen H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():298-309. PubMed ID: 20969833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of continuous masking noise on tone-evoked magnetic fields in humans.
    Morita T; Fujiki N; Nagamine T; Hiraumi H; Naito Y; Shibasaki H; Ito J
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1087(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 16626668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Formant transition-specific adaptation by lipreading of left auditory cortex N1m.
    Jääskeläinen IP; Kauramäki J; Tujunen J; Sams M
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jan; 19(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 18281900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of the task of categorizing FM direction on auditory evoked magnetic fields in the human auditory cortex.
    König R; Sieluzycki C; Simserides C; Heil P; Scheich H
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():102-17. PubMed ID: 18420183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dynamic movement of N100m current sources in auditory evoked fields: comparison of ipsilateral versus contralateral responses in human auditory cortex.
    Jin CY; Ozaki I; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Hashimoto I
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Apr; 60(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 18276027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cross-modal interactions during perception of audiovisual speech and nonspeech signals: an fMRI study.
    Hertrich I; Dietrich S; Ackermann H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):221-37. PubMed ID: 20044895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electrophysiological evidence for a self-processing advantage during audiovisual speech integration.
    Treille A; Vilain C; Kandel S; Sato M
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2867-2876. PubMed ID: 28676921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rapid change of tonotopic maps in the human auditory cortex during pitch discrimination.
    Ozaki I; Jin CY; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1592-604. PubMed ID: 15203060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Abnormal auditory cortical activation in dyslexia 100 msec after speech onset.
    Helenius P; Salmelin R; Richardson U; Leinonen S; Lyytinen H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 May; 14(4):603-17. PubMed ID: 12126501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auditory-visual processing represented in the human superior temporal gyrus.
    Reale RA; Calvert GA; Thesen T; Jenison RL; Kawasaki H; Oya H; Howard MA; Brugge JF
    Neuroscience; 2007 Mar; 145(1):162-84. PubMed ID: 17241747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.