398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28142051)
1. Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and laboratory data in Japanese administrative data.
Yamana H; Moriwaki M; Horiguchi H; Kodan M; Fushimi K; Yasunaga H
J Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):476-482. PubMed ID: 28142051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of diagnoses of respiratory diseases recorded in a Japanese administrative database.
Awano N; Urushiyama H; Yamana H; Yokoyama A; Ando T; Izumo T; Inomata M; Ito Y; Jo T
Respir Investig; 2023 May; 61(3):314-320. PubMed ID: 36868080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity of operative information in Japanese administrative data: a chart review-based analysis of 1221 cases at a single institution.
Konishi T; Yoshimoto T; Fujiogi M; Yamana H; Tanabe M; Seto Y; Yasunaga H
Surg Today; 2022 Oct; 52(10):1484-1490. PubMed ID: 35552817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of procedure codes in International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification administrative data.
Quan H; Parsons GA; Ghali WA
Med Care; 2004 Aug; 42(8):801-9. PubMed ID: 15258482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic review and critical appraisal of validation studies to identify rheumatic diseases in health administrative databases.
Widdifield J; Labrecque J; Lix L; Paterson JM; Bernatsky S; Tu K; Ivers N; Bombardier C
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2013 Sep; 65(9):1490-503. PubMed ID: 23436765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of administrative data diagnoses of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.
Bernatsky S; Linehan T; Hanly JG
J Rheumatol; 2011 Aug; 38(8):1612-6. PubMed ID: 21532057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation Study of Diabetes Definitions Using Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Data Among Hospitalized Patients.
Kanehara R; Goto A; Goto M; Takahashi T; Iwasaki M; Noda M; Ihira H; Tsugane S; Sawada N
J Epidemiol; 2023 Apr; 33(4):165-169. PubMed ID: 34275972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Procedure-Based and Diagnosis-Based Identifications of Severe Sepsis and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Administrative Data.
Yamana H; Horiguchi H; Fushimi K; Yasunaga H
J Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):530-537. PubMed ID: 27064132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation studies of Japanese administrative health care data: A scoping review.
Yamana H; Konishi T; Yasunaga H
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2023 Jul; 32(7):705-717. PubMed ID: 37146098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity of diagnoses and procedures in Japanese dental claims data.
Ono S; Ishimaru M; Ida Y; Yamana H; Ono Y; Hoshi K; Yasunaga H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Oct; 21(1):1116. PubMed ID: 34663302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of initial cancer diagnoses in the Diagnosis Procedure Combination data in Japan.
Shigemi D; Morishima T; Yamana H; Yasunaga H; Miyashiro I
Cancer Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 74():102016. PubMed ID: 34450452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity of Health Administrative Database Definitions for Hypertension: A Systematic Review.
Pace R; Peters T; Rahme E; Dasgupta K
Can J Cardiol; 2017 Aug; 33(8):1052-1059. PubMed ID: 28754391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the validity of using administrative data to identify patients with epilepsy.
Tu K; Wang M; Jaakkimainen RL; Butt D; Ivers NM; Young J; Green D; Jetté N
Epilepsia; 2014 Feb; 55(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 24417710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Current Status of Cardiovascular Medicine in Japan - Analysis of a Large Number of Health Records From a Nationwide Claim-Based Database, JROAD-DPC.
Yasuda S; Nakao K; Nishimura K; Miyamoto Y; Sumita Y; Shishido T; Anzai T; Tsutsui H; Ito H; Komuro I; Saito Y; Ogawa H;
Circ J; 2016 Oct; 80(11):2327-2335. PubMed ID: 27725417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of congenital anomaly coding in Canada's administrative databases compared with a congenital anomaly registry.
Metcalfe A; Sibbald B; Lowry RB; Tough S; Bernier FP
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2014 Feb; 100(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 24307632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing accuracy of diagnosis-type indicators for flagging complications in administrative data.
Quan H; Parsons GA; Ghali WA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 15135837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methods for systematic reviews of administrative database studies capturing health outcomes of interest.
McPheeters ML; Sathe NA; Jerome RN; Carnahan RM
Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31 Suppl 10():K2-6. PubMed ID: 24331070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Agreement between administrative databases and medical charts for pregnancy-related variables among asthmatic women.
Vilain A; Otis S; Forget A; Blais L
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Apr; 17(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 18271060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of data in perinatal population health databases: a systematic review.
Lain SJ; Hadfield RM; Raynes-Greenow CH; Ford JB; Mealing NM; Algert CS; Roberts CL
Med Care; 2012 Apr; 50(4):e7-20. PubMed ID: 21617569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Categorized diagnoses and procedure records in an administrative database improved mortality prediction.
Yamana H; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fushimi K; Yasunaga H
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 68(9):1028-35. PubMed ID: 25596112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
