111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28142339)
1. The Relative Power of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test and Student t Test Under Simple Bounded Transformations.
Zimmerman DW; Zumbo BD
J Gen Psychol; 1990 Oct; 117(4):425-436. PubMed ID: 28142339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Case for omitting tied observations in the two-sample t-test and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test.
McGee M
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200837. PubMed ID: 30040850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental comparison of parametric versus nonparametric analyses of data from the cold pressor test.
Treister R; Nielsen CS; Stubhaug A; Farrar JT; Pud D; Sawilowsky S; Oaklander AL
J Pain; 2015 Jun; 16(6):537-48. PubMed ID: 25801300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Power comparisons of significance tests of location using scores, ranks, and modular ranks.
Zimmerman DW
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):233-43. PubMed ID: 21492130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A note on consistency of non-parametric rank tests and related rank transformations.
Zimmerman DW
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 21518333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Confidence intervals of the Mann-Whitney parameter that are compatible with the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
Fay MP; Malinovsky Y
Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(27):3991-4006. PubMed ID: 29984411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test under scrutiny.
Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1487-97. PubMed ID: 19247980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A powerful and robust test statistic for randomization inference in group-randomized trials with matched pairs of groups.
Zhang K; Traskin M; Small DS
Biometrics; 2012 Mar; 68(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 21732926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal design of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-test.
Bürkner PC; Doebler P; Holling H
Biom J; 2017 Jan; 59(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 27243898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data.
Vickers AJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Nov; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16269081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increasing the power of the Mann-Whitney test in randomized experiments through flexible covariate adjustment.
Vermeulen K; Thas O; Vansteelandt S
Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(6):1012-30. PubMed ID: 25475954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Some power considerations when deciding to use transformations.
Kingman A; Zion G
Stat Med; 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15; 13(5-7):769-83. PubMed ID: 8023049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of profile-likelihood-based confidence intervals with other rank-based methods for the two-sample problem in ordered categorical data.
Funatogawa I; Funatogawa T
J Biopharm Stat; 2023 May; 33(3):371-385. PubMed ID: 36533908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A simple and effective decision rule for choosing a significance test to protect against non-normality.
Zimmerman DW
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):388-409. PubMed ID: 21973093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Power and sample size evaluation for the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel mean score (Wilcoxon rank sum) test and the Cochran-Armitage test for trend.
Lachin JM
Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(25):3057-66. PubMed ID: 22006667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal sample size planning for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
Happ M; Bathke AC; Brunner E
Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(3):363-375. PubMed ID: 30298671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Location tests for biomarker studies: a comparison using simulations for the two-sample case.
Scheinhardt MO; Ziegler A
Methods Inf Med; 2013; 52(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 23877617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outlier removal, sum scores, and the inflation of the Type I error rate in independent samples t tests: the power of alternatives and recommendations.
Bakker M; Wicherts JM
Psychol Methods; 2014 Sep; 19(3):409-27. PubMed ID: 24773354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical research XVI. Differences between medians with the Mann-Whitney U test].
Rivas-Ruiz R; Moreno-Palacios J; Talavera JO
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2013; 51(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 24021070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the relative efficiency of the intent-to-treat Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test in the presence of noncompliance.
Mao L
Biometrika; 2022 Sep; 109(3):873-880. PubMed ID: 36035896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
