These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28142548)

  • 1. Time Course of Location-Cuing Effects With a Probability Manipulation.
    Gottlob LR; Cheal M; Lyon DR
    J Gen Psychol; 1999 Jul; 126(3):261-270. PubMed ID: 28142548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Location cuing and response time distributions in visual attention.
    Gottlob LR
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Nov; 66(8):1293-302. PubMed ID: 15813195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monitoring the visual world: hemispheric asymmetries and subcortical processes in attention.
    Mangun GR; Luck SJ; Plager R; Loftus W; Hillyard SA; Handy T; Clark VP; Gazzaniga MS
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1994; 6(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 23964976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attention: reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms.
    Prinzmetal W; McCool C; Park S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Feb; 134(1):73-92. PubMed ID: 15702964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time course and cost of misdirecting auditory spatial attention in younger and older adults.
    Singh G; Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):711-21. PubMed ID: 24165300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention Operating Characteristics in a Location-Cuing Task.
    Gottlob LR; Cheal M; Lyon DR
    J Gen Psychol; 1999 Jul; 126(3):271-287. PubMed ID: 28142549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence of limited capacity and noise reduction with single-element displays in the location-cuing paradigm.
    Cheal ML; Gregory M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Feb; 23(1):51-71. PubMed ID: 9157188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the spatial metric of short-SOA costs of exogenous cuing.
    Chen P; Moore C; Mordkoff JT
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 18510134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of aging on voluntary and involuntary shifts of attention.
    Lincourt AE; Folk CL; Hoyer WJ
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 1997 Dec; 4(4):290-303. PubMed ID: 29053089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of spatial cuing on the onset repulsion effect.
    Hubbard TL; Ruppel SE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2236-48. PubMed ID: 21769534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition of return and the attentional set for integrating versus differentiating information.
    Lupiáñez J; Milliken B
    J Gen Psychol; 1999 Oct; 126(4):392-418. PubMed ID: 10555867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of multiple irrelevant visual events at the same spatial location on inhibition.
    Visser TA; Barnes D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 19304628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial probability AIDS visual stimulus discrimination.
    Druker M; Anderson B
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2010; 4():. PubMed ID: 20740078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. More power to the unconscious: conscious, but not unconscious, exogenous attention requires location variation.
    Lin Z; Murray SO
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Feb; 26(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 25568064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Going rogue in the spatial cuing paradigm: high spatial validity is insufficient to elicit voluntary shifts of attention.
    Davis GJ; Gibson BS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1192-201. PubMed ID: 22390290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of spatial congruency on saccade and visual discrimination performance in a dual-task paradigm.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():100-11. PubMed ID: 25449339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The development and temporal dynamics of spatial orienting in infants.
    Johnson MH; Tucker LA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):171-88. PubMed ID: 8812042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention.
    Roberts KL; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When cross-modal spatial attention fails.
    Prime DJ; McDonald JJ; Green J; Ward LM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Sep; 62(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 18778148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cueing spatial attention through timing and probability.
    Girardi G; Antonucci G; Nico D
    Cortex; 2013 Jan; 49(1):211-21. PubMed ID: 21982581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.