These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses. Brok J; Thorlund K; Gluud C; Wetterslev J J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):763-9. PubMed ID: 18411040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Explanation of trial sequential analysis: using a post-hoc analysis of meta-analyses published in Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. De Cassai A; Tassone M; Geraldini F; Sergi M; Sella N; Boscolo A; Munari M Korean J Anesthesiol; 2021 Oct; 74(5):383-393. PubMed ID: 34283909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses on interventions in critical care may be inconclusive-a meta-epidemiological study. Koster TM; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Jakobsen JC; Kaufmann T; Eck RJ; Koster G; Hiemstra B; van der Horst ICC; Keus E J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 114():1-10. PubMed ID: 31200004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive--Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses. Brok J; Thorlund K; Wetterslev J; Gluud C Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):287-98. PubMed ID: 18824466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed. Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 20004553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic Reviews of Anesthesiologic Interventions Reported as Statistically Significant: Problems with Power, Precision, and Type 1 Error Protection. Imberger G; Gluud C; Boylan J; Wetterslev J Anesth Analg; 2015 Dec; 121(6):1611-22. PubMed ID: 26579662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis. Wetterslev J; Jakobsen JC; Gluud C BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):39. PubMed ID: 28264661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does Ondansetron Modify Sympathectomy Due to Subarachnoid Anesthesia?: Meta-analysis, Meta-regression, and Trial Sequential Analysis. Terkawi AS; Mavridis D; Flood P; Wetterslev J; Terkawi RS; Bin Abdulhak AA; Nunemaker MS; Tiouririne M Anesthesiology; 2016 Apr; 124(4):846-69. PubMed ID: 26835645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Random error in cardiovascular meta-analyses: how common are false positive and false negative results? AlBalawi Z; McAlister FA; Thorlund K; Wong M; Wetterslev J Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):1102-7. PubMed ID: 23218569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Insufficient information size and potentially false results in orthodontic meta-analyses using trial sequential analysis. Mheissen S; Aldandan M; Khan H Eur J Orthod; 2023 Nov; 45(6):802-807. PubMed ID: 37578494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consequences of sequential sampling for meta-analysis. Braschi L; Botella J; Suero M Behav Res Methods; 2014 Dec; 46(4):1167-83. PubMed ID: 24399083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [How to read a meta-analysis?]. Moulis G; Sommet A Rev Med Interne; 2014 Apr; 35(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 24029290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]