149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28144857)
1. Digital PET compliance to EARL accreditation specifications.
Koopman D; Groot Koerkamp M; Jager PL; Arkies H; Knollema S; Slump CH; Sanches PG; van Dalen JA
EJNMMI Phys; 2017 Dec; 4(1):9. PubMed ID: 28144857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SUV Harmonization Between Different Hybrid PET/CT Systems.
Rubello D; Colletti PM
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 43(11):811-814. PubMed ID: 30199381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. EANM/EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation - summary results from the first 200 accredited imaging systems.
Kaalep A; Sera T; Oyen W; Krause BJ; Chiti A; Liu Y; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Mar; 45(3):412-422. PubMed ID: 29192365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of state of the art PET/CT systems performance harmonisation.
Kaalep A; Sera T; Rijnsdorp S; Yaqub M; Talsma A; Lodge MA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jul; 45(8):1344-1361. PubMed ID: 29500480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5.
Lasnon C; Majdoub M; Lavigne B; Do P; Madelaine J; Visvikis D; Hatt M; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Dec; 43(13):2324-2335. PubMed ID: 27325312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EARL compliance measurements on the biograph vision Quadra PET/CT system with a long axial field of view.
Prenosil GA; Hentschel M; Weitzel T; Sari H; Shi K; Afshar-Oromieh A; Rominger A
EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Apr; 9(1):26. PubMed ID: 35394263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EARL compliance and imaging optimisation on the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT using phantom and clinical data.
van Sluis J; van Snick JH; Brouwers AH; Noordzij W; Dierckx RAJO; Borra RJH; Slart RHJA; Lammertsma AA; Glaudemans AWJM; Boellaard R; Tsoumpas C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Nov; 49(13):4652-4660. PubMed ID: 35876867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standardisation of conventional and advanced iterative reconstruction methods for Gallium-68 multi-centre PET-CT trials.
Krokos G; Pike LC; Cook GJR; Marsden PK
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Jul; 8(1):52. PubMed ID: 34273020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using EQ·PET to reduce reconstruction-dependent variations in [
Vanhoutte M; Semah F; Lopes R; Jaillard A; Petyt G; Aziz AL; Lahousse H; Declerck J; Pasquier F; Spottiswoode B; Fahmi R
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(17):175002. PubMed ID: 31344691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Harmonizing FDG PET quantification while maintaining optimal lesion detection: prospective multicentre validation in 517 oncology patients.
Quak E; Le Roux PY; Hofman MS; Robin P; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns D; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(13):2072-82. PubMed ID: 26219870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Time-of-Flight Information Improved the Detectability of Subcentimeter Spheres Using a Clinical PET/CT Scanner.
Hashimoto N; Morita K; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Baba S; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2018 Sep; 46(3):268-273. PubMed ID: 29599404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Harmonizing SUVs in multicentre trials when using different generation PET systems: prospective validation in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Lasnon C; Desmonts C; Quak E; Gervais R; Do P; Dubos-Arvis C; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Jul; 40(7):985-96. PubMed ID: 23564036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revisiting detection of in-transit metastases in melanoma patients using digital
Zimmermann PA; Houdu B; Césaire L; Nakouri I; De Pontville M; Lasnon C; Aide N
Ann Nucl Med; 2021 Jun; 35(6):669-679. PubMed ID: 33770374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Why harmonization is needed when using FDG PET/CT as a prognosticator: demonstration with EARL-compliant SUV as an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer.
Houdu B; Lasnon C; Licaj I; Thomas G; Do P; Guizard AV; Desmonts C; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Feb; 46(2):421-428. PubMed ID: 30218317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EORTC PET response criteria are more influenced by reconstruction inconsistencies than PERCIST but both benefit from the EARL harmonization program.
Lasnon C; Quak E; Le Roux PY; Robin P; Hofman MS; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns DS; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
EJNMMI Phys; 2017 Dec; 4(1):17. PubMed ID: 28560574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical note: how to determine the FDG activity for tumour PET imaging that satisfies European guidelines.
Koopman D; van Osch JA; Jager PL; Tenbergen CJ; Knollema S; Slump CH; van Dalen JA
EJNMMI Phys; 2016 Dec; 3(1):22. PubMed ID: 27682837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multicentre quantitative
Huizing DMV; Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Gotthardt M; Boellaard R; Sera T; Sinaasappel M; Stokkel MPM; de Wit-van der Veen BJ
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Nov; 6(1):19. PubMed ID: 31705215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Protocols for Harmonized Quantification and Noise Reduction in Low-Dose Oncologic
Machado MAD; Menezes VO; Namías M; Vieira NS; Queiroz CC; Matheoud R; Alessio AM; Oliveira ML
J Nucl Med Technol; 2019 Mar; 47(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 30076252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Generating harmonized SUV within the EANM EARL accreditation program: software approach versus EARL-compliant reconstruction.
Lasnon C; Salomon T; Desmonts C; Dô P; Oulkhouir Y; Madelaine J; Aide N
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Feb; 31(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 27812791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
