169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28145091)
1. Low utility of Oncotype DX® in the clinic.
Ricks-Santi LJ; McDonald JT
Cancer Med; 2017 Mar; 6(3):501-507. PubMed ID: 28145091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Racial Variation in the Uptake of Oncotype DX Testing for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.
Roberts MC; Weinberger M; Dusetzina SB; Dinan MA; Reeder-Hayes KE; Carey LA; Troester MA; Wheeler SB
J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jan; 34(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 26598755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Racial disparities in omission of oncotype DX but no racial disparities in chemotherapy receipt following completed oncotype DX test results.
Press DJ; Ibraheem A; Dolan ME; Goss KH; Conzen S; Huo D
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Feb; 168(1):207-220. PubMed ID: 29181717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trend and survival benefit of Oncotype DX use among female hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients in 17 SEER registries, 2004-2015.
Zhang L; Hsieh MC; Petkov V; Yu Q; Chiu YW; Wu XC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Apr; 180(2):491-501. PubMed ID: 32060781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concordance of breast cancer biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry/in situ hybridization and Oncotype DX qRT-PCR with investigation of discordance, a study of 591 cases.
Sechrist H; Glasgow A; Bomeisl P; Gilmore H; Harbhajanka A
Hum Pathol; 2020 Oct; 104():54-65. PubMed ID: 32758491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of Oncotype DX
Rabie MA; Rankin A; Burger A; Youssef M
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2019 Nov; 101(8):596-601. PubMed ID: 31219316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Nomogram for Predicting the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in Women with T1-3N0-1miM0 Hormone Receptor‒Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 (HER2)‒Negative Breast Cancer.
Lee SB; Kim J; Sohn G; Kim J; Chung IY; Kim HJ; Ko BS; Son BH; Ahn SH; Lee JW; Jung KH
Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jul; 51(3):1073-1085. PubMed ID: 30384581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oncotype DX and Prosigna in breast cancer patients: A comparison study.
Abdelhakam DA; Hanna H; Nassar A
Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2021; 26():100306. PubMed ID: 33444922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Relationship of Race, Oncotype DX, and Ki67 in a Population Highly Screened For Breast Cancer.
Guth AA; Chun Kim J; Schwartz S; Montes J; Snyder RA; Axelrod D; Schnabel F
Breast J; 2017 Mar; 23(2):177-181. PubMed ID: 28299888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Underutilization of gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer in California.
Cress RD; Chen YS; Morris CR; Chew H; Kizer KW
Cancer Causes Control; 2016 Jun; 27(6):721-7. PubMed ID: 27097910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adherence Disparities and Utilization Trends of Oncotype Dx Assay: A National Cancer Database Study.
Chen S; Thacker C; Wang S; Young KA; Hoffman RL; Blansfield JA
J Surg Res; 2023 Jun; 286():65-73. PubMed ID: 36758322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing breast biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry and FISH studies and Oncotype DX testing, a study of 610 cases.
Neely C; You S; Mendoza PM; Aneja R; Sahin AA; Li X
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):889-893. PubMed ID: 30230095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Estrogen receptors, Progesterone receptors and HER2-neu immunohistochemistry results in breast cancer with those of Oncotype Dx.
Sughayer MA; Alhassoon S; Sughayer HM
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2020 Aug; 47():151556. PubMed ID: 32592992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Secondary Invasive Breast Events among Patients with Hormone-Positive Breast Cancer and High-Risk Oncotype DX Recurrence Scores 26-30 and ≥31.
Berger NF; Zimmerman BS; Tharakan S; Suchman K; Cascetta KP; Blanter J; Moshier E; Ru M; Jaffer S; Tiersten A
Oncology; 2021; 99(11):699-702. PubMed ID: 34425579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 21-Gene recurrence scores: racial differences in testing, scores, treatment, and outcome.
Lund MJ; Mosunjac M; Davis KM; Gabram-Mendola S; Rizzo M; Bumpers HL; Hearn S; Zelnak A; Styblo T; O'Regan RM
Cancer; 2012 Feb; 118(3):788-96. PubMed ID: 21720988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of 21-Gene Expression Assay on Clinical Outcomes in Node-Negative ≤ T1b Breast Cancer.
Pomponio M; Keele L; Hilt E; Burkbauer L; Goldbach M; Nazarian S; Fox K; Tchou J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 May; 27(5):1671-1678. PubMed ID: 31686348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Propensity score analysis of the prognostic value of genomic assays for breast cancer in diverse populations using the National Cancer Data Base.
Ibraheem A; Olopade OI; Huo D
Cancer; 2020 Sep; 126(17):4013-4022. PubMed ID: 32521056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative nuclear histomorphometry predicts oncotype DX risk categories for early stage ER+ breast cancer.
Whitney J; Corredor G; Janowczyk A; Ganesan S; Doyle S; Tomaszewski J; Feldman M; Gilmore H; Madabhushi A
BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):610. PubMed ID: 29848291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation Between Oncotype DX, PREDICT and the Nottingham Prognostic Index: Implications for the Management of Early Breast Cancer.
Hillyar C; Rizki H; Abbassi O; Miles-Dua S; Clayton G; Gandamihardja T; Smith S
Cureus; 2020 Apr; 12(4):e7552. PubMed ID: 32382456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation between modified Magee equation-2 and Oncotype-Dx recurrence scores using both traditional and TAILORx cutoffs and the clinical application of the Magee Decision Algorithm: a single institutional review.
Glasgow A; Sechrist H; Bomeisl P; Gilmore H; Harbhajanka A
Breast Cancer; 2021 Mar; 28(2):321-328. PubMed ID: 32951186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
