BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28145530)

  • 1. Improving polygenic risk prediction from summary statistics by an empirical Bayes approach.
    So HC; Sham PC
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():41262. PubMed ID: 28145530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring the predictive power of polygenic scores derived from genome-wide association studies: a study of 10 complex traits.
    So HC; Sham PC
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 33(6):886-892. PubMed ID: 28065900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tuning parameters for polygenic risk score methods using GWAS summary statistics from training data.
    Jiang W; Chen L; Girgenti MJ; Zhao H
    Nat Commun; 2024 Jan; 15(1):24. PubMed ID: 38169469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A principal component approach to improve association testing with polygenic risk scores.
    Coombes BJ; Ploner A; Bergen SE; Biernacka JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 44(7):676-686. PubMed ID: 32691445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Local True Discovery Rate Weighted Polygenic Scores Using GWAS Summary Data.
    Mak TS; Kwan JS; Campbell DD; Sham PC
    Behav Genet; 2016 Jul; 46(4):573-82. PubMed ID: 26747043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pharmacogenomics polygenic risk score for drug response prediction using PRS-PGx methods.
    Zhai S; Zhang H; Mehrotra DV; Shen J
    Nat Commun; 2022 Sep; 13(1):5278. PubMed ID: 36075892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing for polygenic effects in genome-wide association studies.
    Pan W; Chen YM; Wei P
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 May; 39(4):306-16. PubMed ID: 25847094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fast and accurate Bayesian polygenic risk modeling with variational inference.
    Zabad S; Gravel S; Li Y
    Am J Hum Genet; 2023 May; 110(5):741-761. PubMed ID: 37030289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Winner's Curse Correction and Variable Thresholding Improve Performance of Polygenic Risk Modeling Based on Genome-Wide Association Study Summary-Level Data.
    Shi J; Park JH; Duan J; Berndt ST; Moy W; Yu K; Song L; Wheeler W; Hua X; Silverman D; Garcia-Closas M; Hsiung CA; Figueroa JD; Cortessis VK; Malats N; Karagas MR; Vineis P; Chang IS; Lin D; Zhou B; Seow A; Matsuo K; Hong YC; Caporaso NE; Wolpin B; Jacobs E; Petersen GM; Klein AP; Li D; Risch H; Sanders AR; Hsu L; Schoen RE; Brenner H; ; ; ; ; ; ; Stolzenberg-Solomon R; Gejman P; Lan Q; Rothman N; Amundadottir LT; Landi MT; Levinson DF; Chanock SJ; Chatterjee N
    PLoS Genet; 2016 Dec; 12(12):e1006493. PubMed ID: 28036406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient Implementation of Penalized Regression for Genetic Risk Prediction.
    Privé F; Aschard H; Blum MGB
    Genetics; 2019 May; 212(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 30808621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors.
    Ge T; Chen CY; Ni Y; Feng YA; Smoller JW
    Nat Commun; 2019 Apr; 10(1):1776. PubMed ID: 30992449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genome-wide Modeling of Polygenic Risk Score in Colorectal Cancer Risk.
    Thomas M; Sakoda LC; Hoffmeister M; Rosenthal EA; Lee JK; van Duijnhoven FJB; Platz EA; Wu AH; Dampier CH; de la Chapelle A; Wolk A; Joshi AD; Burnett-Hartman A; Gsur A; Lindblom A; Castells A; Win AK; Namjou B; Van Guelpen B; Tangen CM; He Q; Li CI; Schafmayer C; Joshu CE; Ulrich CM; Bishop DT; Buchanan DD; Schaid D; Drew DA; Muller DC; Duggan D; Crosslin DR; Albanes D; Giovannucci EL; Larson E; Qu F; Mentch F; Giles GG; Hakonarson H; Hampel H; Stanaway IB; Figueiredo JC; Huyghe JR; Minnier J; Chang-Claude J; Hampe J; Harley JB; Visvanathan K; Curtis KR; Offit K; Li L; Le Marchand L; Vodickova L; Gunter MJ; Jenkins MA; Slattery ML; Lemire M; Woods MO; Song M; Murphy N; Lindor NM; Dikilitas O; Pharoah PDP; Campbell PT; Newcomb PA; Milne RL; MacInnis RJ; Castellví-Bel S; Ogino S; Berndt SI; Bézieau S; Thibodeau SN; Gallinger SJ; Zaidi SH; Harrison TA; Keku TO; Hudson TJ; Vymetalkova V; Moreno V; Martín V; Arndt V; Wei WQ; Chung W; Su YR; Hayes RB; White E; Vodicka P; Casey G; Gruber SB; Schoen RE; Chan AT; Potter JD; Brenner H; Jarvik GP; Corley DA; Peters U; Hsu L
    Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Sep; 107(3):432-444. PubMed ID: 32758450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. BridgePRS leverages shared genetic effects across ancestries to increase polygenic risk score portability.
    Hoggart CJ; Choi SW; García-González J; Souaiaia T; Preuss M; O'Reilly PF
    Nat Genet; 2024 Jan; 56(1):180-186. PubMed ID: 38123642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Applying polygenic risk score methods to pharmacogenomics GWAS: challenges and opportunities.
    Zhai S; Mehrotra DV; Shen J
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Nov; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 38152980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On polygenic risk scores for complex traits prediction.
    Zhao B; Zou F
    Biometrics; 2022 Jun; 78(2):499-511. PubMed ID: 33786811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PUMAS: fine-tuning polygenic risk scores with GWAS summary statistics.
    Zhao Z; Yi Y; Song J; Wu Y; Zhong X; Lin Y; Hohman TJ; Fletcher J; Lu Q
    Genome Biol; 2021 Sep; 22(1):257. PubMed ID: 34488838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Making the Most of Clumping and Thresholding for Polygenic Scores.
    Privé F; Vilhjálmsson BJ; Aschard H; Blum MGB
    Am J Hum Genet; 2019 Dec; 105(6):1213-1221. PubMed ID: 31761295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new method for multiancestry polygenic prediction improves performance across diverse populations.
    Zhang H; Zhan J; Jin J; Zhang J; Lu W; Zhao R; Ahearn TU; Yu Z; O'Connell J; Jiang Y; Chen T; Okuhara D; ; Garcia-Closas M; Lin X; Koelsch BL; Chatterjee N
    Nat Genet; 2023 Oct; 55(10):1757-1768. PubMed ID: 37749244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving polygenic prediction in ancestrally diverse populations.
    Ruan Y; Lin YF; Feng YA; Chen CY; Lam M; Guo Z; ; He L; Sawa A; Martin AR; Qin S; Huang H; Ge T
    Nat Genet; 2022 May; 54(5):573-580. PubMed ID: 35513724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Leveraging effect size distributions to improve polygenic risk scores derived from summary statistics of genome-wide association studies.
    Song S; Jiang W; Hou L; Zhao H
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Feb; 16(2):e1007565. PubMed ID: 32045423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.