194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28145959)
1. Early Results of Acetabular Reconstruction After Wide Periacetabular Oncologic Resection.
Abdel MP; von Roth P; Perry KI; Rose PS; Lewallen DG; Sim FH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Feb; 99(3):e9. PubMed ID: 28145959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. LUMiC
Bus MP; Szafranski A; Sellevold S; Goryn T; Jutte PC; Bramer JA; Fiocco M; Streitbürger A; Kotrych D; van de Sande MA; Dijkstra PD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):686-695. PubMed ID: 27020434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of tantalum components in the management of acetabular reconstruction following periacetabular oncologic resection in primary malignancies.
Zan P; Ma X; Wang H; Cai Z; Shen J; Sun W
Eur J Med Res; 2022 Aug; 27(1):151. PubMed ID: 35978388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acetabular Reconstruction With Femoral Head Autograft After Intraarticular Resection of Periacetabular Tumors is Durable at Short-term Followup.
Tang X; Guo W; Yang R; Yan T; Tang S; Li D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3060-3070. PubMed ID: 28948491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Porous Tantalum Acetabular Implants and Harrington Reconstruction for Metastatic Disease of the Acetabulum.
Houdek MT; Ferguson PC; Abdel MP; Griffin AM; Hevesi M; Perry KI; Rose PS; Wunder JS; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Jul; 102(14):1239-1247. PubMed ID: 32675673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical technique: Porous tantalum reconstruction for destructive nonprimary periacetabular tumors.
Khan FA; Rose PS; Yanagisawa M; Lewallen DG; Sim FH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):594-601. PubMed ID: 21989784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome of Patients Treated With Porous Tantalum Acetabular Implants for Neoplastic Periacetabular Lesions.
Houdek MT; Abdel MP; Perry KI; Salduz A; Rose PS; Sim FH; Lewallen DG
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2020 Mar; 28(6):256-262. PubMed ID: 31305354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periacetabular Metastatic Disease. An Original Technique of Reconstruction According to the Harrington Classification.
Wegrzyn J; Malatray M; Al-Qahtani T; Pibarot V; Confavreux C; Freyer G
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Aug; 33(8):2546-2555. PubMed ID: 29656965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Poor long-term clinical results of saddle prosthesis after resection of periacetabular tumors.
Jansen JA; van de Sande MA; Dijkstra PD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Jan; 471(1):324-31. PubMed ID: 23054524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Porous tantalum acetabular cups for reconstructions after peri-acetabular resections of primary bone tumours.
Zucchini R; Sambri A; Giannini C; Fiore M; Calamelli C; Donati DM; De Paolis M
Hip Int; 2023 Jan; 33(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 33829914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporary External Fixation Can Stabilize Hip Transposition Arthroplasty After Resection of Malignant Periacetabular Bone Tumors.
Kunisada T; Fujiwara T; Hasei J; Nakata E; Senda M; Ozaki T
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Aug; 477(8):1892-1901. PubMed ID: 30985613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is It Possible and Safe to Perform Acetabular-preserving Resections for Malignant Neoplasms of the Periacetabular Region?
Lam YL; Yau R; Ho KW; Mak KL; Fong ST; So TY
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):656-665. PubMed ID: 27020433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of reconstructive techniques after acetabular resection for pelvic chondrosarcoma.
Houdek MT; Wunder JS; Abdel MP; Griffin AM; Hevesi M; Rose PS; Ferguson PC; Lewallen DG
Bone Joint J; 2021 Feb; 103-B(2):391-397. PubMed ID: 33517732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review.
Brown TS; Salib CG; Rose PS; Sim FH; Lewallen DG; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1 Supple A):22-30. PubMed ID: 29292336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do tantalum components provide adequate primary fixation in all acetabular revisions?
Flecher X; Paprosky W; Grillo JC; Aubaniac JM; Argenson JN
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 May; 96(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 20488141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Custom Acetabular Cages Offer Stable Fixation and Improved Hip Scores for Revision THA With Severe Bone Defects.
Li H; Qu X; Mao Y; Dai K; Zhu Z
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Mar; 474(3):731-40. PubMed ID: 26467611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip arthroplasties using porous tantalum modular acetabular components: 5-year follow-up of clinical trial.
Nakashima Y; Mashima N; Imai H; Mitsugi N; Taki N; Mochida Y; Owan I; Arakaki K; Yamamoto T; Mawatari T; Motomura G; Ohishi M; Doi T; Kanazawa M; Iwamoto Y
Mod Rheumatol; 2013 Jan; 23(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 22395477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity.
DeBoer DK; Christie MJ; Brinson MF; Morrison JC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Apr; 89(4):835-40. PubMed ID: 17403808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: prospective studies examining projected load-bearing area, bone density, cartilage thickness and migration.
Mechlenburg I
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2008 Jun; 79(329):4-43. PubMed ID: 18853289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reconstruction using a constrained-type hip tumor prosthesis after resection of malignant periacetabular tumors: A study by the Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group (JMOG).
Ogura K; Susa M; Morioka H; Matsumine A; Ishii T; Hamada K; Ueda T; Kawai A
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 117(7):1455-1463. PubMed ID: 29473959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
