BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

636 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28148642)

  • 1. Gravity dependence of the effect of optokinetic stimulation on the subjective visual vertical.
    Ward BK; Bockisch CJ; Caramia N; Bertolini G; Tarnutzer AA
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 May; 117(5):1948-1958. PubMed ID: 28148642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contributions of optostatic and optokinetic cues to the perception of vertical.
    Niehof N; Perdreau F; Koppen M; Medendorp WP
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):480-489. PubMed ID: 31166820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prolonged Static Whole-Body Roll-Tilt and Optokinetic Stimulation Significantly Bias the Subjective Postural Vertical in Healthy Human Subjects.
    Wedtgrube A; Bockisch CJ; Straumann D; Tarnutzer AA
    Front Neurol; 2020; 11():595975. PubMed ID: 33178130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time course of the subjective visual vertical during sustained optokinetic and galvanic vestibular stimulation.
    Niehof N; Perdreau F; Koppen M; Medendorp WP
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):788-796. PubMed ID: 31268803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gravity dependence of subjective visual vertical variability.
    Tarnutzer AA; Bockisch C; Straumann D; Olasagasti I
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Sep; 102(3):1657-71. PubMed ID: 19571203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fusion of visual and vestibular tilt cues in the perception of visual vertical.
    Vingerhoets RA; De Vrijer M; Van Gisbergen JA; Medendorp WP
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1321-33. PubMed ID: 19118112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. IV. Influence of visual rotational cues during roll optokinetic stimuli.
    Zupan LH; Merfeld DM
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Jan; 89(1):390-400. PubMed ID: 12522188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human postural responses to motion of real and virtual visual environments under different support base conditions.
    Mergner T; Schweigart G; Maurer C; Blümle A
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 167(4):535-56. PubMed ID: 16132969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modulation of internal estimates of gravity during and after prolonged roll-tilts.
    Tarnutzer AA; Bertolini G; Bockisch CJ; Straumann D; Marti S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e78079. PubMed ID: 24205099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Roll tilt psychophysics in rhesus monkeys during vestibular and visual stimulation.
    Lewis RF; Haburcakova C; Merfeld DM
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):140-53. PubMed ID: 18417632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial orientation of the vestibular system: dependence of optokinetic after-nystagmus on gravity.
    Dai MJ; Raphan T; Cohen B
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Oct; 66(4):1422-39. PubMed ID: 1761991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Static roll-tilt over 5 minutes locally distorts the internal estimate of direction of gravity.
    Tarnutzer AA; Bockisch CJ; Straumann D; Marti S; Bertolini G
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Dec; 112(11):2672-9. PubMed ID: 25185812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of Optokinetic Stimulation on Verticality Perception Are Much Larger for Vision-Based Paradigms Than for Vision-Independent Paradigms.
    Dockheer KM; Bockisch CJ; Tarnutzer AA
    Front Neurol; 2018; 9():323. PubMed ID: 29867732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does gravity influence the visual line bisection task?
    Drakul A; Bockisch CJ; Tarnutzer AA
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Aug; 116(2):629-36. PubMed ID: 27226452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual contributions to human self-motion perception during horizontal body rotation.
    Mergner T; Schweigart G; Müller M; Hlavacka F; Becker W
    Arch Ital Biol; 2000 Apr; 138(2):139-66. PubMed ID: 10782255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Precision and accuracy of the subjective haptic vertical in the roll plane.
    Schuler JR; Bockisch CJ; Straumann D; Tarnutzer AA
    BMC Neurosci; 2010 Jul; 11():83. PubMed ID: 20630097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of prolonged roll-tilt on the subjective visual and haptic vertical in healthy human subjects.
    Wedtgrube A; Bockisch CJ; Tarnutzer AA
    J Vestib Res; 2020; 30(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 32065807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Body-tilt and visual verticality perception during multiple cycles of roll rotation.
    Vingerhoets RA; Medendorp WP; Van Gisbergen JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 May; 99(5):2264-80. PubMed ID: 18337369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of panoramic cues during prolonged roll-tilt adaptation on the percept of vertical.
    Pomante A; Selen LPJ; Romano F; Bockisch CJ; Tarnutzer AA; Bertolini G; Medendorp WP
    J Vestib Res; 2022; 32(2):113-121. PubMed ID: 34308919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optokinetic stimulation in microgravity: torsional eye movements and subjective visual vertical.
    Krafczyk S; Knapek M; Philipp J; Querner V; Dieterich M
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2003 May; 74(5):517-21. PubMed ID: 12751579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.