142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28149761)
1. Impact of dose calculation models on radiotherapy outcomes and quality adjusted life years for lung cancer treatment: do we need to measure radiotherapy outcomes to tune the radiobiological parameters of a normal tissue complication probability model?
Chaikh A; Docquière N; Bondiau PY; Balosso J
Transl Lung Cancer Res; 2016 Dec; 5(6):673-680. PubMed ID: 28149761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the shift of radiobiological metrics in lung radiotherapy plans using 2D gamma index.
Chaikh A; Balosso J
Transl Lung Cancer Res; 2016 Jun; 5(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 27413708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of TCP based EUD to rank and compare lung radiotherapy plans: in-silico study to evaluate the correlation between TCP with physical quality indices.
Chaikh A; Balosso J
Transl Lung Cancer Res; 2017 Jun; 6(3):366-372. PubMed ID: 28713681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistic and dosimetric criteria to assess the shift of the prescribed dose for lung radiotherapy plans when integrating point kernel models in medical physics: are we ready?
Chaikh A; Balosso J
Transl Lung Cancer Res; 2016 Dec; 5(6):681-687. PubMed ID: 28149762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiobiological impact of dose calculation algorithms on biologically optimized IMRT lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans.
Liang X; Penagaricano J; Zheng D; Morrill S; Zhang X; Corry P; Griffin RJ; Han EY; Hardee M; Ratanatharathom V
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jan; 11():10. PubMed ID: 26800883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The photon dose calculation algorithm used in breast radiotherapy has significant impact on the parameters of radiobiological models.
Petillion S; Swinnen A; Defraene G; Verhoeven K; Weltens C; Van den Heuvel F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):259–269. PubMed ID: 25207416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of different dose calculation algorithms on the estimate of NTCP for lung complications.
Hedin E; Bäck A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 14(5):127-39. PubMed ID: 24036865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The radiobiological effect of using Acuros XB vs anisotropic analytical algorithm on hepatocellular carcinoma stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Cheung MLM; Kan MWK; Yeung VTY; Poon DMC; Kam MKM; Lee LKY; Chan ATC
Med Dosim; 2022 Summer; 47(2):161-165. PubMed ID: 35241348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ipsilateral lung normal tissue complication probability parameters for different dose calculation algorithms in radiotherapy of breast cancer.
Kavousi N; Nedaie HA; Gholami S; Esfahani M; Shafiekhani S; Hassani M
J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(6):1323-1330. PubMed ID: 33342791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the NTCP modeling on medical decision to select eligible patient for proton therapy: the usefulness of EUD as an indicator to rank modern photon vs proton treatment plans.
Chaikh A; Calugaru V; Bondiau PY; Thariat J; Balosso J
Int J Radiat Biol; 2018 Sep; 94(9):789-797. PubMed ID: 29878849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiobiological impact of planning techniques for prostate cancer in terms of tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability.
Rana S; Cheng C
Ann Med Health Sci Res; 2014 Mar; 4(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 24761232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. "SABER": A new software tool for radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation.
Zhao B; Joiner MC; Orton CG; Burmeister J
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5586-92. PubMed ID: 21158270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inverse and forward optimization of one- and two-dimensional intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based treatment of concave-shaped planning target volumes: the case of prostate cancer.
Corletto D; Iori M; Paiusco M; Brait L; Broggi S; Ceresoli G; Iotti C; Calandrino R; Fiorino C
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Feb; 66(2):185-95. PubMed ID: 12648791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between pneumonitis risk in radiation oncology and lung density measured with X-ray computed tomography.
Chaikh A; Balosso J
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2016 Aug; 6(4):413-417. PubMed ID: 27709077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analytical anisotropic algorithm versus pencil beam convolution for treatment planning of breast cancer: implications for target coverage and radiation burden of normal tissue.
Flejmer AM; Dohlmar F; Nilsson M; Stenmarker M; Dasu A
Anticancer Res; 2015 May; 35(5):2841-8. PubMed ID: 25964565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conformal irradiation of concave-shaped PTVs in the treatment of prostate cancer by simple 1D intensity-modulated beams.
Fiorino C; Broggi S; Corletto D; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2000 Apr; 55(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 10788688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical implications in the use of the PBC algorithm versus the AAA by comparison of different NTCP models/parameters.
Bufacchi A; Nardiello B; Capparella R; Begnozzi L
Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jul; 8(1):164. PubMed ID: 23826854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integration of radiobiological modeling and indices in comparative plan evaluation: A study comparing VMAT and 3D-CRT in patients with NSCLC.
Roy S; Badragan I; Ahmed SN; Sia M; Singh J; Bahl G
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2018; 8(5):e355-e363. PubMed ID: 29703705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Construction of radiobiological models as TCP (tumor control probability) and NTCP (normal tissue complication probability): from dose to clinical effects prediction].
Chaikh A; Thariat J; Thureau S; Tessonnier T; Kammerer E; Fontbonne C; Dubray B; Balosso J; Fontbonne JM
Cancer Radiother; 2020 Jun; 24(3):247-257. PubMed ID: 32220563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
