1616 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28150224)
1. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention after bipolar hip arthroplasty.
Kaku N; Tabata T; Tagomori H; Tsumura H
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Mar; 137(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 28150224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Midterm results of revision total hip arthroplasty for migrated bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with hip osteoarthritis using cementless cup with the rim-fit technique.
Tanaka T; Kaneko T; Hidaka R; Hashikura K; Ishikura H; Moro T; Tanaka S
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2020; 28(3):2309499020954315. PubMed ID: 32996412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study.
Clohisy JC; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Feb; 81(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10073588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Long-term results of the CLS acetabular cup in primary total hip replacement].
Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Tomás T; Florian Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 19439127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total hip arthroplasty with use of an acetabular reinforcement ring in patients who have congenital dysplasia of the hip. Results at five to fifteen years.
Gill TJ; Sledge JB; Müller ME
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Jul; 80(7):969-79. PubMed ID: 9698001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
Trč T; Stastný E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years.
Dearborn JT; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Aug; 82(8):1146-53. PubMed ID: 10954105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimum ten-year results of primary bipolar hip arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the hip.
Pellegrini VD; Heiges BA; Bixler B; Lehman EB; Davis CM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1817-25. PubMed ID: 16882907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The fate of stable cemented acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty.
Berger RA; Quigley LR; Jacobs JJ; Sheinkop MB; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1682-91. PubMed ID: 10608379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study.
Clohisy JC; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 9973056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft].
Parratte S; Argenson JN; Flecher X; Aubaniac JM
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2007 May; 93(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 17534208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old.
Schreurs BW; Busch VJ; Welten ML; Verdonschot N; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 86(11):2385-92. PubMed ID: 15523007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases.
Hipfl C; Janz V; Löchel J; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 30418066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The fate of stable femoral components retained during isolated acetabular revision: a six-to-twelve-year follow-up study.
Moskal JT; Shen FH; Brown TE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Feb; 84(2):250-5. PubMed ID: 11861731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement.
Maruyama M; Wakabayashi S; Ota H; Tensho K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):387-395. PubMed ID: 27837399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Cup Supporter and Iliac Autograft: A Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up.
Yoshino K; Tsukeoka T; Tsuneizumi Y; Lee TH; Nakamura J; Suzuki M; Ohtori S
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3495-3501. PubMed ID: 28697865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention using computed tomography-based navigation.
Kubota Y; Kaku N; Tagomori H; Kataoka M; Tsumura H
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1311-1317. PubMed ID: 31522901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?
Verspeek J; Nijenhuis TA; Kuijpers MFL; Rijnen WHC; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 32898047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
