These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

547 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28150987)

  • 1. Who r u?: On the (in)accuracy of incumbent-based estimates of range restriction in criterion-related and differential validity research.
    Roth PL; Le H; Oh IS; Van Iddekinge CH; Robbins SB
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 May; 102(5):802-828. PubMed ID: 28150987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Job-specific applicant pools and national norms for cognitive ability tests: implications for range restriction corrections in validation research.
    Sackett PR; Ostgaard DJ
    J Appl Psychol; 1994 Oct; 79(5):680-4. PubMed ID: 7989275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of range restriction and criterion contamination on differential validity of the SAT by race/ethnicity and sex.
    Dahlke JA; Sackett PR; Kuncel NR
    J Appl Psychol; 2019 Jun; 104(6):814-831. PubMed ID: 30640487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment centers versus cognitive ability tests: Challenging the conventional wisdom on criterion-related validity.
    Sackett PR; Shewach OR; Keiser HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Oct; 102(10):1435-1447. PubMed ID: 28530416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential validity for cognitive ability tests in employment and educational settings: not much more than range restriction?
    Roth PL; Le H; Oh IS; Van Iddekinge CH; Buster MA; Robbins SB; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 Jan; 99(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 24079670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range.
    Sackett PR; Zhang C; Berry CM; Lievens F
    J Appl Psychol; 2022 Nov; 107(11):2040-2068. PubMed ID: 34968080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Challenging conclusions about predictive bias against Hispanic test takers in personnel selection.
    Sackett PR; Zhang C; Berry CM
    J Appl Psychol; 2023 Feb; 108(2):341-349. PubMed ID: 34735177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Missing Data Approach to Correct for Direct and Indirect Range Restrictions with a Dichotomous Criterion: A Simulation Study.
    Pfaffel A; Kollmayer M; Schober B; Spiel C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152330. PubMed ID: 27019277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can I retake it? Exploring subgroup differences and criterion-related validity in promotion retesting.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Morgeson FP; Schleicher DJ; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):941-55. PubMed ID: 21517142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A test of a proposed method for estimating validity of a multivariate composite predictor: extending the job component validity model.
    Hoffman CC; Morris D; Luck G
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):900-16. PubMed ID: 20099553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: an updated meta-analysis.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Raymark PH; Odle-Dusseau HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):499-530. PubMed ID: 21319880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revival of test bias research in preemployment testing.
    Aguinis H; Culpepper SA; Pierce CA
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Jul; 95(4):648-80. PubMed ID: 20604587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personality comparison of airline pilot incumbents, applicants, and the general population norms on the 16PF.
    Wakcher S; Cross K; Blackman MC
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Jun; 92(3 Pt 1):773-80. PubMed ID: 12841441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are applicants more likely to quit longer assessments? Examining the effect of assessment length on applicant attrition behavior.
    Hardy JH; Gibson C; Sloan M; Carr A
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Jul; 102(7):1148-1158. PubMed ID: 28333499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity of Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) general test scores for admissions to colleges of veterinary medicine.
    Powers DE
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):208-19. PubMed ID: 15065970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using individual differences to predict job performance: correcting for direct and indirect restriction of range.
    Sjöberg S; Sjöberg A; Näswall K; Sverke M
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 22612634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Job-specific applicant pools and national norms for personality scales: implications for range-restriction corrections in validation research.
    Ones DS; Viswesvaran C
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Jun; 88(3):570-7. PubMed ID: 12814305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Improved Correction for Range Restricted Correlations Under Extreme, Monotonic Quadratic Nonlinearity and Heteroscedasticity.
    Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):550-64. PubMed ID: 25953477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positive manifold limits the relevance of content-matching strategies for validating selection test batteries.
    Murphy KR; Dzieweczynski JL; Zhang Y
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jul; 94(4):1018-31. PubMed ID: 19594241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs.
    Dort JM; Trickey AW; Kallies KJ; Joshi AR; Sidwell RA; Jarman BT
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):e123-9. PubMed ID: 26073713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.