BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28151746)

  • 1. Matching Weights to Simultaneously Compare Three Treatment Groups: Comparison to Three-way Matching.
    Yoshida K; Hernández-Díaz S; Solomon DH; Jackson JW; Gagne JJ; Glynn RJ; Franklin JM
    Epidemiology; 2017 May; 28(3):387-395. PubMed ID: 28151746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Matching by propensity score in cohort studies with three treatment groups.
    Rassen JA; Shelat AA; Franklin JM; Glynn RJ; Solomon DH; Schneeweiss S
    Epidemiology; 2013 May; 24(3):401-9. PubMed ID: 23532053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Propensity score weighting under limited overlap and model misspecification.
    Zhou Y; Matsouaka RA; Thomas L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3721-3756. PubMed ID: 32693715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Calipers for Matching on the Disease Risk Score.
    Connolly JG; Gagne JJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2016 May; 183(10):937-48. PubMed ID: 27037270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propensity Score Weighting Compared to Matching in a Study of Dabigatran and Warfarin.
    Seeger JD; Bykov K; Bartels DB; Huybrechts K; Schneeweiss S
    Drug Saf; 2017 Feb; 40(2):169-181. PubMed ID: 27900668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments.
    Patorno E; Glynn RJ; Hernández-Díaz S; Liu J; Schneeweiss S
    Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 24487209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The comparative safety of analgesics in older adults with arthritis.
    Solomon DH; Rassen JA; Glynn RJ; Lee J; Levin R; Schneeweiss S
    Arch Intern Med; 2010 Dec; 170(22):1968-76. PubMed ID: 21149752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applied comparison of large-scale propensity score matching and cardinality matching for causal inference in observational research.
    Fortin SP; Johnston SS; Schuemie MJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):109. PubMed ID: 34030640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic matching for time-dependent treatments: a longitudinal extension and simulation study.
    Weymann D; Chan B; Regier DA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Aug; 23(1):181. PubMed ID: 37559105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance evaluation of regression splines for propensity score adjustment in post-market safety analysis with multiple treatments.
    Tian Y; Baro E; Zhang R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(5):810-821. PubMed ID: 31502924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The comparative safety of opioids for nonmalignant pain in older adults.
    Solomon DH; Rassen JA; Glynn RJ; Garneau K; Levin R; Lee J; Schneeweiss S
    Arch Intern Med; 2010 Dec; 170(22):1979-86. PubMed ID: 21149754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The safety of opioid analgesics in the elderly: new data raise new concerns: comment on "The comparative safety of opioids for nonmalignant pain in older adults".
    Becker WC; O'Connor PG
    Arch Intern Med; 2010 Dec; 170(22):1986-8. PubMed ID: 21149755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores in Estimating Counterfactual Survival Functions via the Overlap Weights.
    Cheng C; Li F; Thomas LE; Li FF
    Am J Epidemiol; 2022 May; 191(6):1140-1151. PubMed ID: 35238335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vector-based kernel weighting: A simple estimator for improving precision and bias of average treatment effects in multiple treatment settings.
    Garrido MM; Lum J; Pizer SD
    Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(5):1204-1223. PubMed ID: 33327037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2837-49. PubMed ID: 23239115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of a propensity score to adjust for channelling bias with NSAIDs.
    Morant SV; Pettitt D; MacDonald TM; Burke TA; Goldstein JL
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2004 Jun; 13(6):345-53. PubMed ID: 15170763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the use of propensity scores in case of rare exposure.
    Hajage D; Tubach F; Steg PG; Bhatt DL; De Rycke Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():38. PubMed ID: 27036963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multinomial Extension of Propensity Score Trimming Methods: A Simulation Study.
    Yoshida K; Solomon DH; Haneuse S; Kim SC; Patorno E; Tedeschi SK; Lyu H; Franklin JM; Stürmer T; Hernández-Díaz S; Glynn RJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 188(3):609-616. PubMed ID: 30517602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes.
    Franklin JM; Eddings W; Austin PC; Stuart EA; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(12):1946-1963. PubMed ID: 28208229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.