336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28151888)
1. Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma: Predictive value of interim 18F-FDG PET/CT in therapy response assessment.
Ferrari C; Niccoli Asabella A; Merenda N; Altini C; Fanelli M; Muggeo P; De Leonardis F; Perillo T; Santoro N; Rubini G
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Feb; 96(5):e5973. PubMed ID: 28151888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Prognostic evaluation value of (18)F-FDG PET-CT in Hodgkin's lymphoma after treatment].
Wan H; Liu P; Liang Y; Jiang SY; Lyu L; Zhang ZW; Wu N; Liu Y
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2021 Dec; 43(12):1275-1281. PubMed ID: 34915636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Interim 18F-FDG PET SUVmax reduction is superior to visual analysis in predicting outcome early in Hodgkin lymphoma patients.
Rossi C; Kanoun S; Berriolo-Riedinger A; Dygai-Cochet I; Humbert O; Legouge C; Chrétien ML; Bastie JN; Brunotte F; Casasnovas RO
J Nucl Med; 2014 Apr; 55(4):569-73. PubMed ID: 24566003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Semiquantitative analysis of interim
Ribeiro T; Marques A; Ferreira G; Castro C; Tavares M; Espírito-Santo A; Moreira C; Mariz J
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2021; 40(5):281-286. PubMed ID: 34425968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of outcome in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma based on interpretation of
Isik EG; Kuyumcu S; Kebudi R; Sanli Y; Karakas Z; Cakir FB; Unal SN
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 31(9):660-668. PubMed ID: 28741053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Only strongly enhanced residual FDG uptake in early response PET (Deauville 5 or qPET ≥ 2) is prognostic in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: Results of the GPOH-HD2002 trial.
Kurch L; Hasenclever D; Kluge R; Georgi T; Tchavdarova L; Golombeck M; Sabri O; Eggert A; Brenner W; Sykora KW; Bengel FM; Rossig C; Körholz D; Schäfers M; Feuchtinger T; Bartenstein P; Ammann RA; Krause T; Urban C; Aigner R; Gattenlöhner S; Klapper W; Mauz-Körholz C
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2019 Mar; 66(3):e27539. PubMed ID: 30426671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined Visual and Semiquantitative Evaluation Improves Outcome Prediction by Early Midtreatment
Györke T; Carr R; Cerci JJ; Meneghetti C; Redondo F; Celli M; Gorospe C; Auewarakul CU; Jorgov L; Paez D; Fanti S
J Nucl Med; 2020 Jul; 61(7):999-1005. PubMed ID: 31757842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic value of PET using 18F-FDG in Hodgkin's disease for posttreatment evaluation.
Guay C; Lépine M; Verreault J; Bénard F
J Nucl Med; 2003 Aug; 44(8):1225-31. PubMed ID: 12902411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Midtreatment ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT Scan for Early Response Assessment of SMILE Therapy in Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma: A Prospective Study from a Single Center.
Khong PL; Huang B; Lee EY; Chan WK; Kwong YL
J Nucl Med; 2014 Jun; 55(6):911-6. PubMed ID: 24819420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chemotherapy Response Assessment by FDG-PET-CT in Early-stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: Moving Beyond the Five-Point Deauville Score.
Milgrom SA; Dong W; Akhtari M; Smith GL; Pinnix CC; Mawlawi O; Rohren E; Garg N; Chuang H; Yehia ZA; Reddy JP; Gunther JR; Khoury JD; Suki T; Osborne EM; Oki Y; Fanale M; Dabaja BS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Feb; 97(2):333-338. PubMed ID: 28068241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 18F-FDG PET/CT for early response assessment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: poor predictive value of international harmonization project interpretation.
Cashen AF; Dehdashti F; Luo J; Homb A; Siegel BA; Bartlett NL
J Nucl Med; 2011 Mar; 52(3):386-92. PubMed ID: 21321279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for assessment of response to brentuximab vedotin treatment in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.
Kahraman D; Theurich S; Rothe A; Kuhnert G; Sasse S; Scheid C; Dietlein M; Drzezga A; von Bergwelt-Baildon M; Kobe C
Leuk Lymphoma; 2014 Apr; 55(4):811-6. PubMed ID: 23805904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Prospective Multicenter Comparison of Early Interim FLT PET/CT versus FDG PET/CT with IHP, EORTC, Deauville, and PERCIST Criteria for Early Therapeutic Monitoring.
Minamimoto R; Fayad L; Advani R; Vose J; Macapinlac H; Meza J; Hankins J; Mottaghy F; Juweid M; Quon A
Radiology; 2016 Jul; 280(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 26854705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive value of (18)F-FDG hybrid PET/CT for the clinical outcome in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma prior to and after autologous stem cell transplantation.
Qiao W; Zhao J; Wang C; Wang T; Xing Y
Hematology; 2010 Feb; 15(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 20132658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined prognostic role of TARC and interim
Husi K; Pinczés LI; Fejes Z; Nagy B; Illés Á; Miltényi Z
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(2):125-131. PubMed ID: 35913858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [
Ferrari C; Santo G; Mammucci P; Rubini D; Sciacqua A; Sardaro A; Pisani AR; Rubini G
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Feb; 23(1):34. PubMed ID: 36814217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MR and FDG-PET/CT in Hodgkin Lymphoma: Predictive role before treatment and early assessment after two courses of ABVD.
Albano D; Patti C; Matranga D; Lagalla R; Midiri M; Galia M
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jun; 103():90-98. PubMed ID: 29803392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Whole-Body Diffusion-Weighted MRI Compared to
Shapira-Zaltsberg G; Wilson N; Trejo Perez E; Abbott L; Dinning S; Kapoor C; Davila J; Smith B; Miller E
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2020 May; 71(2):217-225. PubMed ID: 32062992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic analysis of interim
Yuan L; Kreissl MC; Su L; Wu Z; Hacker M; Liu J; Zhang X; Bo Y; Zhang H; Li X; Li S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Feb; 46(2):478-488. PubMed ID: 30382301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Posttreatment PET/CT Rather Than Interim PET/CT Using Deauville Criteria Predicts Outcome in Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Prospective Study Comparing PET/CT with Conventional Imaging.
Bakhshi S; Bhethanabhotla S; Kumar R; Agarwal K; Sharma P; Thulkar S; Malhotra A; Dhawan D; Vishnubhatla S
J Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 58(4):577-583. PubMed ID: 27754902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
