446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28152076)
1. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.
Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Simkin SK; Thomson M; Thompson B; Collins AV
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.
Paudel N; Jacobs RJ; Sloan R; Denny S; Shea K; Thompson B; Anstice N
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28656671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Crowded letter and crowded picture logMAR acuity in children with amblyopia: a quantitative comparison.
O'Boyle C; Chen SI; Little JA
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):457-461. PubMed ID: 27388249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of printed and computerised crowded Kay picture logMAR tests against gold standard ETDRS acuity test chart measurements in adult and amblyopic paediatric subjects.
Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Rashid S; Hysi P
Eye (Lond); 2012 Apr; 26(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 22193878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of optotypes of Amsterdam Picture Chart with those of Tumbling-E, LEA symbols, ETDRS, and Landolt-C in non-amblyopic and amblyopic patients.
Engin O; Despriet DD; van der Meulen-Schot HM; Romers A; Slot X; Sang MT; Fronius M; Kelderman H; Simonsz HJ
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 252(12):2013-20. PubMed ID: 25228066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The differing impact of induced astigmatic blur on crowded and uncrowded paediatric visual acuity chart results.
Little JA; Molloy J; Saunders KJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):492-500. PubMed ID: 23009274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The logMAR Kay picture test and the logMAR acuity test: a comparative study.
Elliott MC; Firth AY
Eye (Lond); 2009 Jan; 23(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 17901881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of visual acuity charts in young adults and patients with diabetic retinopathy.
Plainis S; Kontadakis G; Feloni E; Giannakopoulou T; Tsilimbaris MK; Pallikaris IG; Moschandreas J
Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 90(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 23314130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of Lea Symbol vs ETDRS letter distance visual acuity in a population of young children with a high prevalence of astigmatism.
Dobson V; Clifford-Donaldson CE; Miller JM; Garvey KA; Harvey EM
J AAPOS; 2009 Jun; 13(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 19345596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Threshold visual acuity testing of preschool children using the crowded HOTV and Lea Symbols acuity tests.
Cyert L; Schmidt P; Maguire M; Moore B; Dobson V; Quinn G;
J AAPOS; 2003 Dec; 7(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 14730291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Construction and Validation of LEA Hindi Chart: A Multicenter Study.
Datta S; Varadharajan S; Mazumdar D; Narayanan A; Monira S; Panda S; Hyvärinen L; Satgunam P
Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):351-359. PubMed ID: 32413007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols.
Lalor SJH; Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ
Vision Res; 2016 Apr; 121():31-38. PubMed ID: 26878696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of Visual Acuity in Children Using Crowded Lea Symbol Charts.
Sailoganathan A; Rou LX; Buja KA; Siderov J
Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Aug; 95(8):643-647. PubMed ID: 30063661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement between Lea Symbols and Patti Pics visual acuity in children and adults.
Sapkota A; Sitaula S; Shrestha GS; Joshi ND; Koirala B; Paudel N
J Optom; 2023; 16(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 36717317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of visual acuity measurements via three different methods in preschool children: Lea symbols, crowded Lea symbols, Snellen E chart.
Inal A; Ocak OB; Aygit ED; Yilmaz I; Inal B; Taskapili M; Gokyigit B
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1385-1391. PubMed ID: 28639088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preliminary clinical validation of a new picture-based visual acuity test in children with amblyopia: a comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and crowded logMAR letters.
McVeigh EM; Ludden SM; Mohamed S; Shah N; Mulholland PJ; Dahlmann-Noor A
Eye (Lond); 2022 Dec; 36(12):2341-2345. PubMed ID: 34987195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Patti Pics and Lea Symbols optotypes in children and adults.
Mercer ME; Drover JR; Penney KJ; Courage ML; Adams RJ
Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 90(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 23376895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application.
Rhiu S; Lee HJ; Goo YS; Cho K; Kim JH
Telemed J E Health; 2016 Mar; 22(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 26280910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the HOTV and Lea symbols visual acuity tests in patients with amblyopia.
Ruttum MS; Dahlgren M
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2006; 43(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 16761636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
