These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28152076)

  • 1. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.
    Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Simkin SK; Thomson M; Thompson B; Collins AV
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.
    Paudel N; Jacobs RJ; Sloan R; Denny S; Shea K; Thompson B; Anstice N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28656671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crowded letter and crowded picture logMAR acuity in children with amblyopia: a quantitative comparison.
    O'Boyle C; Chen SI; Little JA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):457-461. PubMed ID: 27388249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of printed and computerised crowded Kay picture logMAR tests against gold standard ETDRS acuity test chart measurements in adult and amblyopic paediatric subjects.
    Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Rashid S; Hysi P
    Eye (Lond); 2012 Apr; 26(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 22193878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of optotypes of Amsterdam Picture Chart with those of Tumbling-E, LEA symbols, ETDRS, and Landolt-C in non-amblyopic and amblyopic patients.
    Engin O; Despriet DD; van der Meulen-Schot HM; Romers A; Slot X; Sang MT; Fronius M; Kelderman H; Simonsz HJ
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 252(12):2013-20. PubMed ID: 25228066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The differing impact of induced astigmatic blur on crowded and uncrowded paediatric visual acuity chart results.
    Little JA; Molloy J; Saunders KJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):492-500. PubMed ID: 23009274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The logMAR Kay picture test and the logMAR acuity test: a comparative study.
    Elliott MC; Firth AY
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Jan; 23(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 17901881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of visual acuity charts in young adults and patients with diabetic retinopathy.
    Plainis S; Kontadakis G; Feloni E; Giannakopoulou T; Tsilimbaris MK; Pallikaris IG; Moschandreas J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 90(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 23314130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of Lea Symbol vs ETDRS letter distance visual acuity in a population of young children with a high prevalence of astigmatism.
    Dobson V; Clifford-Donaldson CE; Miller JM; Garvey KA; Harvey EM
    J AAPOS; 2009 Jun; 13(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 19345596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
    Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Threshold visual acuity testing of preschool children using the crowded HOTV and Lea Symbols acuity tests.
    Cyert L; Schmidt P; Maguire M; Moore B; Dobson V; Quinn G;
    J AAPOS; 2003 Dec; 7(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 14730291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Construction and Validation of LEA Hindi Chart: A Multicenter Study.
    Datta S; Varadharajan S; Mazumdar D; Narayanan A; Monira S; Panda S; Hyvärinen L; Satgunam P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):351-359. PubMed ID: 32413007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols.
    Lalor SJH; Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ
    Vision Res; 2016 Apr; 121():31-38. PubMed ID: 26878696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of Visual Acuity in Children Using Crowded Lea Symbol Charts.
    Sailoganathan A; Rou LX; Buja KA; Siderov J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Aug; 95(8):643-647. PubMed ID: 30063661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Agreement between Lea Symbols and Patti Pics visual acuity in children and adults.
    Sapkota A; Sitaula S; Shrestha GS; Joshi ND; Koirala B; Paudel N
    J Optom; 2023; 16(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 36717317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of visual acuity measurements via three different methods in preschool children: Lea symbols, crowded Lea symbols, Snellen E chart.
    Inal A; Ocak OB; Aygit ED; Yilmaz I; Inal B; Taskapili M; Gokyigit B
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1385-1391. PubMed ID: 28639088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preliminary clinical validation of a new picture-based visual acuity test in children with amblyopia: a comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and crowded logMAR letters.
    McVeigh EM; Ludden SM; Mohamed S; Shah N; Mulholland PJ; Dahlmann-Noor A
    Eye (Lond); 2022 Dec; 36(12):2341-2345. PubMed ID: 34987195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Patti Pics and Lea Symbols optotypes in children and adults.
    Mercer ME; Drover JR; Penney KJ; Courage ML; Adams RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 90(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 23376895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application.
    Rhiu S; Lee HJ; Goo YS; Cho K; Kim JH
    Telemed J E Health; 2016 Mar; 22(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 26280910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the HOTV and Lea symbols visual acuity tests in patients with amblyopia.
    Ruttum MS; Dahlgren M
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2006; 43(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 16761636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.