230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28153153)
1. Cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional radiography in visualization of maxillary impacted-canine localization: A systematic review of comparative studies.
Eslami E; Barkhordar H; Abramovitch K; Kim J; Masoud MI
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Feb; 151(2):248-258. PubMed ID: 28153153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cone-beam computed tomography or conventional radiography for localising of maxillary impacted canines?
Amintavakoli N; Spivakovsky S
Evid Based Dent; 2018 Mar; 19(1):22-23. PubMed ID: 29568018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines.
Haney E; Gansky SA; Lee JS; Johnson E; Maki K; Miller AJ; Huang JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):590-7. PubMed ID: 20451777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT-based interpretations of maxillary impacted canines compared to those of conventional radiography: An in vitro study.
Hajeer MY; Al-Homsi HK; Alfailany DT; Murad RMT
Int Orthod; 2022 Jun; 20(2):100639. PubMed ID: 35606269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional orthodontic radiographic modalities and cone-beam computed tomography for localization of impacted maxillary canine teeth.
Salari B; Tofangchiha M; Padisar P; Reda R; Zanza A; Testarelli L
Sci Prog; 2024; 107(1):368504241228077. PubMed ID: 38359866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and two-dimensional imaging methods in the 3D localization and assessment of maxillary impacted canines compared to the gold standard in-vivo readings: A cross-sectional study.
Alfailany DT; Shaweesh AI; Hajeer MY; Brad B; Alhaffar JB
Int Orthod; 2023 Sep; 21(3):100780. PubMed ID: 37290351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impacted maxillary canines and root resorptions of neighbouring teeth: a radiographic analysis using cone-beam computed tomography.
Lai CS; Bornstein MM; Mock L; Heuberger BM; Dietrich T; Katsaros C
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Aug; 35(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 22828076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of impacted maxillary canines on root resorption of lateral incisors : A cone beam computed tomography study.
Ucar FI; Celebi AA; Tan E; Topcuoğlu T; Sekerci AE
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):233-240. PubMed ID: 28204849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Three-Dimensional and Conventional Orthodontic Imaging Modalities for Localization of Impacted Maxillary Canines in Patients With Alveolar Cleft.
Padisar P; Tofangchiha M; Salari B; Oveisi S
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2021 Feb; 58(2):202-207. PubMed ID: 32783463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Orthodontic treatment planning for impacted maxillary canines using conventional records versus 3D CBCT.
Alqerban A; Willems G; Bernaerts C; Vangastel J; Politis C; Jacobs R
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 36(6):698-707. PubMed ID: 24406479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of different radiographic methods for the localization of displaced maxillary canines.
Tsolakis AI; Kalavritinos M; Bitsanis E; Sanoudos M; Benetou V; Alexiou K; Tsiklakis K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Feb; 153(2):308-314. PubMed ID: 29407509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines.
Botticelli S; Verna C; Cattaneo PM; Heidmann J; Melsen B
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 21131389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The essential role of cone beam computed tomography to diagnose the localization of impacted maxillary canine and to detect the austerity of the adjacent root resorption in the Romanian population.
Oana L; Zetu I; Petcu A; Nemtoi A; Dragan E; Haba D
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2013; 117(1):212-6. PubMed ID: 24505917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiographic predictors for maxillary canine impaction.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 25726402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the root apex position of impacted maxillary canines on panoramic films.
Kim SH; Son WS; Yamaguchi T; Maki K; Kim SS; Park SB; Kim YI
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Oct; 152(4):489-493. PubMed ID: 28962733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Will supplemental cone beam computed tomography change the treatment plan of impacted maxillary canines based on 2D radiography? A prospective clinical study.
Stoustrup P; Videbæk A; Wenzel A; Matzen LH
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Jan; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 37934968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of a new prognostic tool for impacted maxillary canines, 'Easy box': A cone-beam computed tomographic study.
P MS; Sundareswaran S; Mohammed F; Jisha B
J Orthod; 2023 Mar; 50(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 36113095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic methods and treatment strategies of impacted maxillary canines: A literature review.
Grybienė V; Juozėnaitė D; Kubiliūtė K
Stomatologija; 2019; 21(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 31619657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Localization of impacted maxillary canines and root resorption of neighbouring teeth: a study assessing the diagnostic value of panoramic radiographs in two groups of observers.
Lai CS; Suter VG; Katsaros C; Bornstein MM
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Aug; 36(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 24123189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
