These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28153156)

  • 1. Overjet reduction in relation to wear time with the van Beek activator combined with a microsensor.
    Al-Kurwi AS; Bos A; Kuitert RB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Feb; 151(2):277-283. PubMed ID: 28153156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying patient adherence during active orthodontic treatment with removable appliances using microelectronic wear-time documentation.
    Schäfer K; Ludwig B; Meyer-Gutknecht H; Schott TC
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 24993614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient compliance with Twin Block appliance during treatment of Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial on two check-up prescriptions.
    Frilund E; Sonesson M; Magnusson A
    Eur J Orthod; 2023 Mar; 45(2):142-149. PubMed ID: 35968672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microelectronic wear-time documentation of removable orthodontic devices detects heterogeneous wear behavior and individualizes treatment planning.
    Schott TC; Ludwig B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Aug; 146(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 25085297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of wear time recording on the patient's compliance.
    Pauls A; Nienkemper M; Panayotidis A; Wilmes B; Drescher D
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Nov; 83(6):1002-8. PubMed ID: 23611166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functional appliance treatment outcome and need for additional orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance.
    Rizell S; Svensson B; Tengström C; Kjellberg H
    Swed Dent J; 2006; 30(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16878681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microsensor technology to help monitor removable appliance wear.
    Ackerman MB; McRae MS; Longley WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):549-51. PubMed ID: 19361743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification of patient compliance with Hawley retainers and removable functional appliances during the retention phase.
    Schott TC; Schlipf C; Glasl B; Schwarzer CL; Weber J; Ludwig B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Oct; 144(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 24075661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Questionnaire study of electronic wear-time tracking as experienced by patients and parents during treatment with removable orthodontic appliances.
    Schott TC; Schrey S; Walter J; Glasl BA; Ludwig B
    J Orofac Orthop; 2013 May; 74(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 23649280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment effects of a twin-force bite corrector versus an activator in comparison with an untreated Class II sample: a preliminary report.
    Dalci O; Altug AT; Memikoglu UT
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 24968645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of objective wear time between monoblock and twin-block appliances measured by microsensor.
    Kutay C; Kılıçoğlu H; Sayar G
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Nov; 91(6):749-755. PubMed ID: 34319376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison between indirect and objective wear-time assessment of removable orthodontic appliances.
    Schott TC; Meyer-Gutknecht H; Mayer N; Weber J; Weimer K
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Apr; 39(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 27030283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Micro-electronic monitoring of functional appliance wear.
    Sahm G; Bartsch A; Witt E
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 Aug; 12(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 2401338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment compliance of adolescent orthodontic patients with headgear activator and twin-block appliance assessed prospectively using microelectronic wear-time documentation.
    Arponen H; Hirvensalo R; Lindgren V; Kiukkonen A
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr; 42(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 31982915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical and quantitative assessment of headgear compliance: a pilot study.
    Brandão M; Pinho HS; Urias D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 16473716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overjet, overbite, and anterior crowding relapses in extraction and nonextraction patients, and their correlations.
    Francisconi MF; Janson G; Freitas KM; Oliveira RC; Oliveira RC; Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 24975000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective assessment of patient compliance with removable orthodontic appliances: a cross-sectional cohort study.
    Tsomos G; Ludwig B; Grossen J; Pazera P; Gkantidis N
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 23834273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orthodontic correction of overjet/overbite ('parrot mouth') in 73 foals (1999-2013).
    Easley J; Dixon PM; Reardon RJ
    Equine Vet J; 2016 Sep; 48(5):565-72. PubMed ID: 26582741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Young patients' attitudes toward removable appliance wear times, wear-time instructions and electronic wear-time measurements--results of a questionnaire study.
    Schott TC; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2010 Mar; 71(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 20354837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.