These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28153161)

  • 21. Discriminant factor analysis of dental arch dimensions with 3-dimensional virtual models.
    Slaj M; Spalj S; Jelusic D; Slaj M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):680-7. PubMed ID: 22051488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is there a relationship between dental crowding and the size of the maxillary or mandibular apical base?
    Crossley AM; Campbell PM; Tadlock LP; Schneiderman E; Buschang PH
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 31549856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The influence of three-dimensional maxillary protraction simulation on dental and basal arch width coordination in early permanent dentition skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion].
    Huang C; Wen X; Huang L; Ning Z
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2022 Oct; 31(5):550-555. PubMed ID: 36758607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Skeletal and dental contributions to posterior crossbites.
    Allen D; Rebellato J; Sheats R; Ceron AM
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Oct; 73(5):515-24. PubMed ID: 14580018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Arch width changes in extraction and nonextraction treatment in class I patients.
    Aksu M; Kocadereli I
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):948-52. PubMed ID: 16448236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Arch-width and perimeter changes in patients with borderline Class I malocclusion treated with extractions or without extractions with air-rotor stripping.
    Germec-Cakan D; Taner TU; Akan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jun; 137(6):734.e1-7; discussion 734-5. PubMed ID: 20685525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [A comparative study of the transverse dimensions of the dental arches between Class I dental occlusion and Class II1 and Class II2 malocclusions].
    Halimi A; Azeroual MF; Abouqal R; Zaoui F
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2011 Dec; 34(136):47-52. PubMed ID: 22457992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of arch widths in adults with normal occlusion and adults with class II, Division 1 malocclusion.
    Staley RN; Stuntz WR; Peterson LC
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Aug; 88(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 3861102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Alveolar and dental arch morphology in Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Bălan RA; Popa G; Biţă R; Fabricky M; Jivănescu A; Bratu DC
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2014; 55(3 Suppl):1093-7. PubMed ID: 25607390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Components of adult Class III malocclusion.
    Ellis E; McNamara JA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1984 May; 42(5):295-305. PubMed ID: 6585502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The form of the human dental arch.
    Braun S; Hnat WP; Fender DE; Legan HL
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Feb; 68(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 9503132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of dental arch and alveolar widths of patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusion and subjects with Class I ideal occlusion.
    Sayin MO; Turkkahraman H
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 15264647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Curve of Spee and its relationship to vertical eruption of teeth among different malocclusion groups.
    Veli I; Ozturk MA; Uysal T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 25726397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Arch-width changes in extraction vs nonextraction treatments in matched Class I borderline malocclusions.
    Herzog C; Konstantonis D; Konstantoni N; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Apr; 151(4):735-743. PubMed ID: 28364897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of arch forms between Israeli and North American white populations.
    Gafni Y; Tzur-Gadassi L; Nojima K; McLaughlin RP; Abed Y; Redlich M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 21392688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of Intercanine and Intermolar Width Between Cleft Lip Palate and Normal Class I Occlusion Group.
    Wahaj A; Ahmed I
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Nov; 25(11):811-4. PubMed ID: 26577967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Association of maxillary and mandibular base lengths with dental crowding in different skeletal malocclusions.
    Khoja A; Fida M; Shaikh A
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2014; 26(4):428-33. PubMed ID: 25672157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of maxillary arch dimensional and inclination changes with self-ligating and conventional brackets using broad archwires.
    Atik E; Akarsu-Guven B; Kocadereli I; Ciger S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jun; 149(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 27241993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Transverse dimensions of dental arches in subjects with Class II malocclusion in the early mixed dentition.
    Marinelli A; Mariotti M; Defraia E
    Prog Orthod; 2011; 12(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 21515229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.