These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28153369)

  • 1. Biologic Variation Approach to Daily Laboratory.
    Ricós C; Álvarez V; Minchinela J; Fernández-Calle P; Perich C; Boned B; González E; Simón M; Díaz-Garzón J; García-Lario JV; Cava F; Fernández-Fernández P; Corte Z; Biosca C
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 28153369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Domestic and international trends concerning allowable limits of error in external quality assessment scheme].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2005 Jun; 53(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 16026083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sigma Metrics Across the Total Testing Process.
    Charuruks N
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):97-117. PubMed ID: 28153373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ASVCP guidelines: allowable total error guidelines for biochemistry.
    Harr KE; Flatland B; Nabity M; Freeman KP;
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2013 Dec; 42(4):424-36. PubMed ID: 24320779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementation of standardization in clinical practice: not always an easy task.
    Panteghini M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2012 Feb; 50(7):1237-41. PubMed ID: 22850055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sunway Medical Laboratory Quality Control Plans Based on Six Sigma, Risk Management and Uncertainty.
    Jairaman J; Sakiman Z; Li LS
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):163-176. PubMed ID: 28153364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current status of verification practices in clinical biochemistry in Spain.
    Gómez-Rioja R; Alvarez V; Ventura M; Alsina MJ; Barba N; Cortés M; Llopis MA; Martínez C; Ibarz M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Sep; 51(9):1739-46. PubMed ID: 23612663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Internal quality control: best practice.
    Kinns H; Pitkin S; Housley D; Freedman DB
    J Clin Pathol; 2013 Dec; 66(12):1027-32. PubMed ID: 24072731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple matrix of analytical performance to identify assays that risk patients using External Quality Assurance Program data.
    Mackay M; Hegedus G; Badrick T
    Clin Biochem; 2016 May; 49(7-8):596-600. PubMed ID: 26800780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new concept to derive permissible limits for analytical imprecision and bias considering diagnostic requirements and technical state-of-the-art.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Apr; 49(4):623-35. PubMed ID: 21345158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Analytical uncertainty--how wrong can a laboratory result be?].
    Bolann BJ; Stølsnes B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Dec; 119(30):4472-5. PubMed ID: 10827487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Error in laboratory reference limits as shown in a collaborative quality-assurance program.
    Compton PJ; Stuart MC; Lazarus L
    Clin Chem; 1986 May; 32(5):845-9. PubMed ID: 3516451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rhetoric Versus Reality? Laboratory Surveys Show Actual Practice Differs Considerably from Proposed Models and Mandated Calculations.
    Westgard SA
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 28153368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Standardization of the methods of lipid determination according to WHO in the regional project of prevention of cardiovascular diseases in Friuli-Venezia Giulia].
    Grafnetter D; Feruglio GA; Vanuzzo D
    G Ital Cardiol; 1996 Mar; 26(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 8690184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Biological variations as objective measures of analytical precision and clinic informativity in laboratory tests (lecture)].
    Men'shikov VV; Lukichev TI; Pimenova LM
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2004 May; (5):21-32. PubMed ID: 15230113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reference change value: a proposal to interpret laboratory reports in serial testing based on biological variation.
    Ricós C; Cava F; García-Lario JV; Hernández A; Iglesias N; Jiménez CV; Minchinela J; Perich C; Simón M; Domenech MV; Alvarez V
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2004; 64(3):175-84. PubMed ID: 15222627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Allowable limits of analytical error which can guarantee the reliability of reference intervals for interpretation of clinical laboratory data].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2008 Jul; 56(7):617-21. PubMed ID: 18709995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality indicators and specifications for the extra-analytical phases in clinical laboratory management.
    Ricós C; García-Victoria M; de la Fuente B
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(6):578-82. PubMed ID: 15259371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reprint of "Influence of analytical bias and imprecision on the number of false positive results using Guideline-Driven Medical Decision Limits".
    Hyltoft Petersen P; Klee GG
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():127-34. PubMed ID: 24747109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Verification/validation of the performances of analytical method].
    Vassault A; Hulin A; Chapuzet E; Arnaud J; Giroud C;
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2010 Dec; 68 Spec No 1():247-94. PubMed ID: 21613021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.