These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28154049)

  • 1. Bringing probability judgments into policy debates via forecasting tournaments.
    Tetlock PE; Mellers BA; Scoblic JP
    Science; 2017 Feb; 355(6324):481-483. PubMed ID: 28154049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From discipline-centered rivalries to solution-centered science: Producing better probability estimates for policy makers.
    Mellers BA; Tetlock PE
    Am Psychol; 2019 Apr; 74(3):290-300. PubMed ID: 30945892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forecasting tournaments, epistemic humility and attitude depolarization.
    Mellers B; Tetlock P; Arkes HR
    Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():19-26. PubMed ID: 30389145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human judgement forecasting tournaments: A feasibility study based on the COVID-19 pandemic with public health practitioners in England.
    Davies N; Ferris S
    Public Health Pract (Oxf); 2022 Jun; 3():100260. PubMed ID: 35479262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying and cultivating superforecasters as a method of improving probabilistic predictions.
    Mellers B; Stone E; Murray T; Minster A; Rohrbaugh N; Bishop M; Chen E; Baker J; Hou Y; Horowitz M; Ungar L; Tetlock P
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 May; 10(3):267-81. PubMed ID: 25987508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournament.
    Mellers B; Ungar L; Baron J; Ramos J; Gurcay B; Fincher K; Scott SE; Moore D; Atanasov P; Swift SA; Murray T; Stone E; Tetlock PE
    Psychol Sci; 2014 May; 25(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 24659192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The psychology of intelligence analysis: drivers of prediction accuracy in world politics.
    Mellers B; Stone E; Atanasov P; Rohrbaugh N; Metz SE; Ungar L; Bishop MM; Horowitz M; Merkle E; Tetlock P
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Mar; 21(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 25581088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving Intelligence Analysis With Decision Science.
    Dhami MK; Mandel DR; Mellers BA; Tetlock PE
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Nov; 10(6):753-7. PubMed ID: 26581731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The wisdom of many in few: Finding individuals who are as wise as the crowd.
    Himmelstein M; Budescu DV; Ho EH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 May; 152(5):1223-1244. PubMed ID: 36862490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Choice Restriction on Accuracy and User Experience in an Internet-Based Geopolitical Forecasting Task.
    Widmer CL; Summerville A; Juvina I; Minnery BS
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():662279. PubMed ID: 34335374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Causal Inference Methods for Estimating Long-Term Health Effects of Air Quality Regulations.
    Zigler CM; Kim C; Choirat C; Hansen JB; Wang Y; Hund L; Samet J; King G; Dominici F;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2016 May; (187):5-49. PubMed ID: 27526497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of the Perceptual and Technical Demands of Tennis Training, Simulated Match Play, and Competitive Tournaments.
    Murphy AP; Duffield R; Kellett A; Reid M
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2016 Jan; 11(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 25849156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust bounds on choosing from large tournaments.
    Saile C; Suksompong W
    Soc Choice Welfare; 2020; 54(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 32055084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An Approach to Improve the Performance of PM Forecasters.
    de Mattos Neto PS; Cavalcanti GD; Madeiro F; Ferreira TA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138507. PubMed ID: 26414182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is Tit-for-Tat the Answer? On the Conclusions Drawn from Axelrod's Tournaments.
    Rapoport A; Seale DA; Colman AM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134128. PubMed ID: 26225422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of presenting imprecise probabilities in intelligence forecasts.
    Dieckmann NF; Mauro R; Slovic P
    Risk Anal; 2010 Jun; 30(6):987-1001. PubMed ID: 20409043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forecasting survival in the medical intensive care unit: a comparison of clinical prognoses with formal estimates.
    Christensen C; Cottrell JJ; Murakami J; Mackesy ME; Fetzer AS; Elstein AS
    Methods Inf Med; 1993 Aug; 32(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 8412825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bringing 'the public' into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice.
    Abelson J; Giacomini M; Lehoux P; Gauvin FP
    Health Policy; 2007 Jun; 82(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 16996637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inadvertent advocacy.
    Wilhere GF
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Feb; 26(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 22280324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The wisdom of many in one mind: improving individual judgments with dialectical bootstrapping.
    Herzog SM; Hertwig R
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Feb; 20(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 19170937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.