102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2815458)
1. Role of nuclear grading in stage I renal cell carcinoma.
Green LK; Ayala AG; Ro JY; Swanson DA; Grignon DJ; Giacco GG; Guinee VF
Urology; 1989 Nov; 34(5):310-5. PubMed ID: 2815458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nucleolar grade but not Fuhrman grade is applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma.
Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; William Jordan T; Delahunt B
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1091-6. PubMed ID: 16931953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic value of nuclear grading in patients with intracapsular (pT1-pT2) renal cell carcinoma. Long-term analysis in 213 patients.
Minervini A; Lilas L; Minervini R; Selli C
Cancer; 2002 May; 94(10):2590-5. PubMed ID: 12173325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; Martignoni G; Eble JN; Jordan TW
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 17527087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade.
Paner GP; Amin MB; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Moch H; Lyles RH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1233-40. PubMed ID: 20679882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic value of nuclear grade of renal cell carcinoma.
Bretheau D; Lechevallier E; de Fromont M; Sault MC; Rampal M; Coulange C
Cancer; 1995 Dec; 76(12):2543-9. PubMed ID: 8625083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of morphometric nuclear image analysis using the Feulgen reaction in renal cell carcinoma.
Lee JS; Jung JJ; Lee MC; Park CS; Juhng SW; Oh BR; Moon JD
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2000 Feb; 22(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10696458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; William Jordan T; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Aug; 35(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21716085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nuclear shape analysis for assessment of prognosis in renal cell carcinoma.
Murphy GF; Partin AW; Maygarden SJ; Mohler JL
J Urol; 1990 Jun; 143(6):1103-7. PubMed ID: 2342168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic value of renal cell carcinoma nuclear grading: multivariate analysis of 333 cases.
Ficarra V; Righetti R; Martignoni G; D'Amico A; Pilloni S; Rubilotta E; Malossini G; Mobilio G
Urol Int; 2001; 67(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11490206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic value of karyometric and clinical characteristics in renal cell carcinoma. Quantitative assessment of tumor heterogeneity.
van der Poel HG; Mulders PF; Oosterhof GO; Schaafsma HE; Hendriks JC; Schalken JA; Debruyne FM
Cancer; 1993 Nov; 72(9):2667-74. PubMed ID: 8402488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of histoquantitative measurements in prognostic assessment of renal adenocarcinoma.
Eskelinen M; Lipponen P; Aitto-Oja L; Hall O; Syrjänen K
Int J Cancer; 1993 Oct; 55(4):547-54. PubMed ID: 8406980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Morphometric index of adult renal cell carcinoma. Comparison with the Fuhrman grading system.
Montironi R; Santinelli A; Pomante R; Mazzucchelli R; Colanzi P; Filho AL; Scarpelli M
Virchows Arch; 2000 Jul; 437(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 10963384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nuclear morphometry as an important prognostic factor in stage I renal cell carcinoma.
Tosi P; Luzi P; Baak JP; Miracco C; Santopietro R; Vindigni C; Mattei FM; Acconcia A; Massai MR
Cancer; 1986 Dec; 58(11):2512-8. PubMed ID: 3768843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nuclear quantitative grading by discriminant analysis of renal cell carcinoma samples. A patient survival evaluation.
Artacho-Pérula E; Roldán-Villalobos R; Martínez-Cuevas JF; López-Rubio F
J Pathol; 1994 Jun; 173(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 8089804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrastructural morphometry of nucleoli: potential usefulness for objective grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Lloreta-Trull J; Bielsa-Galí O; Domínguez-Solà D; Arumí-Uría M; Pavesi M; Gelabert A; Serrano-Figueras S
Ultrastruct Pathol; 2001; 25(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 11407523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tumor Necrosis Adds Prognostically Significant Information to Grade in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Study of 842 Consecutive Cases From a Single Institution.
Khor LY; Dhakal HP; Jia X; Reynolds JP; McKenney JK; Rini BI; Magi-Galluzzi C; Przybycin CG
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Sep; 40(9):1224-31. PubMed ID: 27428737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.
Yoo C; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):486-91; discussion 491. PubMed ID: 18550101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria.
Tsui KH; Shvarts O; Smith RB; Figlin RA; deKernion JB; Belldegrun A
J Urol; 2000 Apr; 163(4):1090-5; quiz 1295. PubMed ID: 10737472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients.
Gudbjartsson T; Hardarson S; Petursdottir V; Thoroddsen A; Magnusson J; Einarsson GV
Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 15964127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
