These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2815458)
21. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Collecting system invasion and Fuhrman grade but not tumor size facilitate prognostic stratification of patients with pT2 renal cell carcinoma. Brookman-May S; May M; Zigeuner R; Shariat SF; Scherr DS; Chromecki T; Moch H; Wild PJ; Mohamad-Al-Ali B; Cindolo L; Wieland WF; Schips L; De Cobelli O; Rocco B; Santoro L; De Nunzio C; Tubaro A; Coman I; Feciche B; Truss M; Dalpiaz O; Hohenfellner M; Gilfrich C; Wirth MP; Burger M; Pahernik S; J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2175-81. PubMed ID: 22014800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Fuhrman grading system has no prognostic value in patients with nonsarcomatoid chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Steffens S; Janssen M; Roos FC; Becker F; Steinestel J; Abbas M; Steinestel K; Wegener G; Siemer S; Thüroff JW; Hofmann R; Stöckle M; Schrader M; Hartmann A; Hasenfus A; Kuczyk MA; Junker K; Schrader AJ; Hum Pathol; 2014 Dec; 45(12):2411-6. PubMed ID: 25305793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Significance of nuclear grade and tumor size in Korean patients with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a comparison with conventional renal cell carcinoma. Ku JH; Moon KC; Kwak C; Kim HH Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 19767221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Computerized nuclear morphometry and survival in renal cell carcinoma: comparison with other prognostic indicators. Delahunt B; Becker RL; Bethwaite PB; Ribas JL Pathology; 1994 Oct; 26(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 7892031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma. Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The chromophobe tumor grading system is the preferred grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Finley DS; Shuch B; Said JW; Galliano G; Jeffries RA; Afifi AA; Castor B; Magyar C; Sadaat A; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2168-74. PubMed ID: 22014797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prognostic value of histological grade and nuclear grade in renal adenocarcinoma. Marroncle M; Irani J; Dore B; Levillain P; Goujon JM; Aubert J J Urol; 1994 May; 151(5):1174-6. PubMed ID: 8158753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The influence of pNx/pN0 grouping in a multivariate setting for outcome modeling in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Ward JF; Blute ML; Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Weaver AL; Zincke H J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 12050492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative study of the prognostic value of nuclear grade and silver-binding nucleolar organizer region in renal cell carcinomas. Yang AH; Wang TY; Liu HC J Pathol; 1992 Feb; 166(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 1560316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prognostic value of microvascular invasion in predicting survival in renal cell carcinoma. Santiago-Agredano B; Álvarez-Kindelán J; Font-Ugalde P; Blanca-Pedregosa A; López-Beltrán A; Requena-Tapia MJ Actas Urol Esp; 2013 Sep; 37(8):504-12. PubMed ID: 23623182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: histomorphologic characteristics and evaluation of conventional pathologic prognostic parameters in 145 cases. Amin MB; Paner GP; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Lyles RH; Moch H Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Dec; 32(12):1822-34. PubMed ID: 18813125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic significance of nuclear morphometry in renal cell carcinoma. Ozer E; Yörükoğlu K; Sagol O; Mungan U; Demirel D; Tüzel E; Kirkali Z BJU Int; 2002 Jul; 90(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 12081763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prognostic significance of granular cell content in renal cell carcinoma. Munichor M; Lichtig C; Tzin G; Weiss A Eur Urol; 1992; 22(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 1468476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prognostic significance of primary-tumor extension, stage and grade of nuclear differentiation in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Fiori E; De Cesare A; Galati G; Bononi M; D'Andrea N; Barbarosos A; Izzo L; Bolognese A J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Jun; 21(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 12148583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up. Lang H; Lindner V; de Fromont M; Molinié V; Letourneux H; Meyer N; Martin M; Jacqmin D Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 15611969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]