These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Screening for breast cancer: worries about its effectiveness]. Autier P Rev Prat; 2013 Dec; 63(10):1369-77. PubMed ID: 24579331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Availability of prior mammograms affects incomplete report rates in mobile screening mammography. Roubidoux MA; Shih-Pei Wu P; Nolte ELR; Begay JA; Joe AI Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Oct; 171(3):667-673. PubMed ID: 29951970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Organized or individual breast cancer screening: what motivates women?]. Kalecinski J; Régnier-Denois V; Ouédraogo S; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Dumas A; Arveux P; Chauvin F Sante Publique; 2015; 27(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 26414035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mobile Mammography Participation Among Medically Underserved Women: A Systematic Review. Vang S; Margolies LR; Jandorf L Prev Chronic Dis; 2018 Nov; 15():E140. PubMed ID: 30447104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding barriers to organized breast cancer screening in France: women's perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge. Ferrat E; Le Breton J; Djassibel M; Veerabudun K; Brixi Z; Attali C; Renard V Fam Pract; 2013 Aug; 30(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 23478254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. To what extent is women's economic situation associated with cancer screening uptake when nationwide screening exists? A study of breast and cervical cancer screening in France in 2010. Menvielle G; Richard JB; Ringa V; Dray-Spira R; Beck F Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Aug; 25(8):977-83. PubMed ID: 24842393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of an organized, nationwide breast cancer screening programme on non-organized mammography activities. Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Pintér I; Battyány I; Ember I J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 18416949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Population-based study of breast cancer screening in Côte d'Or (France): clinical implications and factors affecting screening round adequacy. Ouedraogo S; Dabakuyo TS; Gentil J; Poillot ML; Dancourt V; Arveux P Eur J Cancer Prev; 2011 Nov; 20(6):462-74. PubMed ID: 22025137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Mobile Mammography Unit for Breast Cancer Screening to Reduce Geographic and Social Health Inequalities. De Mil R; Guillaume E; Launay L; Guittet L; Dejardin O; Bouvier V; Notari A; Launoy G; Berchi C Value Health; 2019 Oct; 22(10):1111-1118. PubMed ID: 31563253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Could mobile mammography reduce social and geographic inequalities in breast cancer screening participation? Guillaume E; Launay L; Dejardin O; Bouvier V; Guittet L; Déan P; Notari A; De Mil R; Launoy G Prev Med; 2017 Jul; 100():84-88. PubMed ID: 28408217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contribution and performance of mobile units in an organized mammography screening program. Fontenoy AM; Langlois A; Chang SL; Daigle JM; Pelletier É; Guertin MH; Théberge I; Brisson J Can J Public Health; 2013 Mar; 104(3):e193-9. PubMed ID: 23823881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image Quality and Performance Benchmarks in Vehicle and Hospital Mammography. Chien CY; Loh EW; Lin YK; Huang TW; Wang YH; Wang HW; Tseng YC; Yao MM; Tam KW Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Jun; 20(3):e358-e365. PubMed ID: 32171703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Breast cancer screening imaging: what do we do]. Balu-Maestro C; Chapellier C; Souci J; Caramella T; Marcotte-Bloch C J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2010 Feb; 39(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 19850418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of screening on breast cancer detection. Retrospective comparative study of two periods ten years apart. Aubard Y; Genet D; Eyraud JL; Clavère P; Tubiana-Mathieu N; Philippe HJ Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2002; 23(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 11876389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics of women using organized or opportunistic breast cancer screening in France. Analysis of the 2006 French Health, Health Care and Insurance Survey. Duport N Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Dec; 60(6):421-30. PubMed ID: 23146369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Using medical imaging for a comprehensive breast cancer screening program]. Dilhuydy MH Bull Cancer; 2009 Nov; 96(11):1071-86. PubMed ID: 19887333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Blinded double reading yields a higher programme sensitivity than non-blinded double reading at digital screening mammography: a prospected population based study in the south of The Netherlands. Klompenhouwer EG; Voogd AC; den Heeten GJ; Strobbe LJ; de Haan AF; Wauters CA; Broeders MJ; Duijm LE Eur J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 25573788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]