194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28155735)
1. [Is “mobile mammography” a Relevant Method in France?].
Vallée A
Sante Publique; 2016 Nov; 28(5):599-602. PubMed ID: 28155735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Organized breast cancer screening].
Rouëssé J; Sancho-Garnier H;
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2014 Feb; 198(2):369-86. PubMed ID: 26263710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Screening for breast cancer: worries about its effectiveness].
Autier P
Rev Prat; 2013 Dec; 63(10):1369-77. PubMed ID: 24579331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Availability of prior mammograms affects incomplete report rates in mobile screening mammography.
Roubidoux MA; Shih-Pei Wu P; Nolte ELR; Begay JA; Joe AI
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Oct; 171(3):667-673. PubMed ID: 29951970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Breast cancer screening in thirteen French departments].
Ouédraogo S; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Roussot A; Dialla PO; Pornet C; Poillot ML; Soler-Michel P; Sarlin N; Lunaud P; Desmidt P; Paré E; Mathis C; Rymzhanova R; Kuntz-Huon J; Exbrayat C; Bataillard A; Régnier V; Kalecinski J; Quantin C; Dumas A; Gentil J; Amiel P; Chauvin F; Dancourt V; Arveux P
Bull Cancer; 2015 Feb; 102(2):126-38. PubMed ID: 25636359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Organized or individual breast cancer screening: what motivates women?].
Kalecinski J; Régnier-Denois V; Ouédraogo S; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Dumas A; Arveux P; Chauvin F
Sante Publique; 2015; 27(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 26414035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mobile Mammography Participation Among Medically Underserved Women: A Systematic Review.
Vang S; Margolies LR; Jandorf L
Prev Chronic Dis; 2018 Nov; 15():E140. PubMed ID: 30447104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding barriers to organized breast cancer screening in France: women's perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge.
Ferrat E; Le Breton J; Djassibel M; Veerabudun K; Brixi Z; Attali C; Renard V
Fam Pract; 2013 Aug; 30(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 23478254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. To what extent is women's economic situation associated with cancer screening uptake when nationwide screening exists? A study of breast and cervical cancer screening in France in 2010.
Menvielle G; Richard JB; Ringa V; Dray-Spira R; Beck F
Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Aug; 25(8):977-83. PubMed ID: 24842393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of an organized, nationwide breast cancer screening programme on non-organized mammography activities.
Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Pintér I; Battyány I; Ember I
J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 18416949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Population-based study of breast cancer screening in Côte d'Or (France): clinical implications and factors affecting screening round adequacy.
Ouedraogo S; Dabakuyo TS; Gentil J; Poillot ML; Dancourt V; Arveux P
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2011 Nov; 20(6):462-74. PubMed ID: 22025137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Mobile Mammography Unit for Breast Cancer Screening to Reduce Geographic and Social Health Inequalities.
De Mil R; Guillaume E; Launay L; Guittet L; Dejardin O; Bouvier V; Notari A; Launoy G; Berchi C
Value Health; 2019 Oct; 22(10):1111-1118. PubMed ID: 31563253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Could mobile mammography reduce social and geographic inequalities in breast cancer screening participation?
Guillaume E; Launay L; Dejardin O; Bouvier V; Guittet L; Déan P; Notari A; De Mil R; Launoy G
Prev Med; 2017 Jul; 100():84-88. PubMed ID: 28408217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contribution and performance of mobile units in an organized mammography screening program.
Fontenoy AM; Langlois A; Chang SL; Daigle JM; Pelletier É; Guertin MH; Théberge I; Brisson J
Can J Public Health; 2013 Mar; 104(3):e193-9. PubMed ID: 23823881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image Quality and Performance Benchmarks in Vehicle and Hospital Mammography.
Chien CY; Loh EW; Lin YK; Huang TW; Wang YH; Wang HW; Tseng YC; Yao MM; Tam KW
Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Jun; 20(3):e358-e365. PubMed ID: 32171703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Breast cancer screening imaging: what do we do].
Balu-Maestro C; Chapellier C; Souci J; Caramella T; Marcotte-Bloch C
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2010 Feb; 39(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 19850418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of screening on breast cancer detection. Retrospective comparative study of two periods ten years apart.
Aubard Y; Genet D; Eyraud JL; Clavère P; Tubiana-Mathieu N; Philippe HJ
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2002; 23(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 11876389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics of women using organized or opportunistic breast cancer screening in France. Analysis of the 2006 French Health, Health Care and Insurance Survey.
Duport N
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Dec; 60(6):421-30. PubMed ID: 23146369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Using medical imaging for a comprehensive breast cancer screening program].
Dilhuydy MH
Bull Cancer; 2009 Nov; 96(11):1071-86. PubMed ID: 19887333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Blinded double reading yields a higher programme sensitivity than non-blinded double reading at digital screening mammography: a prospected population based study in the south of The Netherlands.
Klompenhouwer EG; Voogd AC; den Heeten GJ; Strobbe LJ; de Haan AF; Wauters CA; Broeders MJ; Duijm LE
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 25573788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
