271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28155999)
1. Accuracy of Grading Gleason Score 7 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: Influence of Percent Pattern 4 and Other Histological Factors.
Meliti A; Sadimin E; Diolombi M; Khani F; Epstein JI
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):681-685. PubMed ID: 28155999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver Reproducibility of Percent Gleason Pattern 4 in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Prostate Biopsies.
Sadimin ET; Khani F; Diolombi M; Meliti A; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Dec; 40(12):1686-1692. PubMed ID: 27487740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer.
Ozkan TA; Eruyar AT; Cebeci OO; Memik O; Ozcan L; Kuskonmaz I
Scand J Urol; 2016 Dec; 50(6):420-424. PubMed ID: 27416104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue.
Gottipati S; Warncke J; Vollmer R; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):900-7. PubMed ID: 22367295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States.
Oyama T; Allsbrook WC; Kurokawa K; Matsuda H; Segawa A; Sano T; Suzuki K; Epstein JI
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 16048389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accurate Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma in prostate needle biopsies by general pathologists.
Renshaw AA; Schultz D; Cote K; Loffredo M; Ziemba DE; D'Amico AV
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Aug; 127(8):1007-8. PubMed ID: 12873176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gleason grading of prostate cancer: level of concordance between pathologists at the University Hospital of the West Indies.
Coard KC; Freeman VL
Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 Sep; 122(3):373-6. PubMed ID: 15362366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The value of the modified Gleason grading system of prostate adenocarcinoma in routine urological diagnostics].
Helpap B; Egevad L
Urologe A; 2007 Jan; 46(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 17111167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should intervening benign tissue be included in the measurement of discontinuous foci of cancer on prostate needle biopsy? Correlation with radical prostatectomy findings.
Karram S; Trock BJ; Netto GJ; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Sep; 35(9):1351-5. PubMed ID: 21836493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.
Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Billis A; Cheng L; Clouston D; Evans A; Furusato B; Kench J; Leite K; MacLennan G; Moch H; Pan CC; Rioux-Leclercq N; Ro J; Shanks J; Shen S; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Wheeler T; Yaxley J; Egevad L
Pathology; 2019 Aug; 51(5):463-473. PubMed ID: 31279442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The reasons behind variation in Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies: areas of agreement and misconception among 266 European pathologists.
Berney DM; Algaba F; Camparo P; Compérat E; Griffiths D; Kristiansen G; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Varma M; Egevad L
Histopathology; 2014 Feb; 64(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 24102975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of Gleason pattern 5 on prostatic needle core biopsy: frequency of underdiagnosis and relation to morphology.
Fajardo DA; Miyamoto H; Miller JS; Lee TK; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Nov; 35(11):1706-11. PubMed ID: 21997691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason pattern 5 on core biopsy: frequency of diagnosis, morphologic subpatterns, and relation to pattern distribution based on the modified Gleason grading system.
Shah RB; Tadros Y
Hum Pathol; 2014 Nov; 45(11):2263-9. PubMed ID: 25228336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma among general pathologists.
Singh RV; Agashe SR; Gosavi AV; Sulhyan KR
Indian J Cancer; 2011; 48(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 22293266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcome of Gleason 3 + 5 = 8 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed on Needle Biopsy: Prognostic Comparison with Gleason 4 + 4 = 8.
Harding-Jackson N; Kryvenko ON; Whittington EE; Eastwood DC; Tjionas GA; Jorda M; Iczkowski KA
J Urol; 2016 Oct; 196(4):1076-81. PubMed ID: 27265220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
