186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28157584)
1. Normality and actual causal strength.
Icard TF; Kominsky JF; Knobe J
Cognition; 2017 Apr; 161():80-93. PubMed ID: 28157584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Causal judgments about atypical actions are influenced by agents' epistemic states.
Kirfel L; Lagnado D
Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104721. PubMed ID: 33930783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inferring mass in complex scenes by mental simulation.
Hamrick JB; Battaglia PW; Griffiths TL; Tenenbaum JB
Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():61-76. PubMed ID: 27592412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identifying expectations about the strength of causal relationships.
Yeung S; Griffiths TL
Cogn Psychol; 2015 Feb; 76():1-29. PubMed ID: 25522277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stable Causal Relationships Are Better Causal Relationships.
Vasilyeva N; Blanchard T; Lombrozo T
Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 42(4):1265-1296. PubMed ID: 29687462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A counterfactual explanation for the action effect in causal judgment.
Henne P; Niemi L; Pinillos Á; De Brigard F; Knobe J
Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():157-164. PubMed ID: 31082750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Compact representations of extended causal models.
Halpern JY; Hitchcock C
Cogn Sci; 2013 Aug; 37(6):986-1010. PubMed ID: 23865548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of causal models in multiple judgments under uncertainty.
Hayes BK; Hawkins GE; Newell BR; Pasqualino M; Rehder B
Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):611-20. PubMed ID: 25238316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A counterfactual simulation model of causation by omission.
Gerstenberg T; Stephan S
Cognition; 2021 Nov; 216():104842. PubMed ID: 34303272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.
Krynski TR; Tenenbaum JB
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 17696692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A quantitative causal model theory of conditional reasoning.
Fernbach PM; Erb CD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1327-43. PubMed ID: 23565785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An interaction effect of norm violations on causal judgment.
Gill M; Kominsky JF; Icard TF; Knobe J
Cognition; 2022 Nov; 228():105183. PubMed ID: 35830782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative causal selection patterns in token causation.
Morris A; Phillips J; Gerstenberg T; Cushman F
PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0219704. PubMed ID: 31369584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Normality: Part descriptive, part prescriptive.
Bear A; Knobe J
Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():25-37. PubMed ID: 27842702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic reasoning.
Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 May; 140(2):168-85. PubMed ID: 21219081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. People's conditional probability judgments follow probability theory (plus noise).
Costello F; Watts P
Cogn Psychol; 2016 Sep; 89():106-33. PubMed ID: 27570097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. BUCKLE: a model of unobserved cause learning.
Luhmann CC; Ahn WK
Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):657-77. PubMed ID: 17638500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are Jurors Intuitive Statisticians? Bayesian Causal Reasoning in Legal Contexts.
Shengelia T; Lagnado D
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():519262. PubMed ID: 33613348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Process Model of Causal Reasoning.
Davis ZJ; Rehder B
Cogn Sci; 2020 May; 44(5):e12839. PubMed ID: 32419205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Judgment dissociation theory: an analysis of differences in causal, counterfactual, and covariational reasoning.
Mandel DR
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Sep; 132(3):419-34. PubMed ID: 13678376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
