These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28158301)

  • 1. Does order matter? Investigating the effect of sequence on glance duration during on-road driving.
    Lee J; Roberts SC; Reimer B; Mehler B
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171730. PubMed ID: 28158301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sequential in-vehicle glance distributions: an alternative approach for analyzing glance data.
    Yamani Y; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Fisher DL
    Hum Factors; 2015 Jun; 57(4):567-72. PubMed ID: 25977319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
    Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationships Between Older Drivers' Cognitive Abilities as Assessed on the MoCA and Glance Patterns During Visual-Manual Radio Tuning While Driving.
    Lee J; Mehler B; Reimer B; Ebe K; Coughlin JF
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2018 Sep; 73(7):1190-1197. PubMed ID: 27698013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How safe is tuning a radio?: using the radio tuning task as a benchmark for distracted driving.
    Lee JY; Lee JD; Bärgman J; Lee J; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():29-37. PubMed ID: 29101787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining drivers' eye glance patterns during distracted driving: Insights from scanning randomness and glance transition matrix.
    Wang Y; Bao S; Du W; Ye Z; Sayer JR
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():149-155. PubMed ID: 29203013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Looking out or Looking Away?-Exploring the Impact of Driving With a Passenger on Young Drivers' Eye Glance Behavior.
    Mehrotra S; Zhang F; Roberts SC
    Hum Factors; 2023 Nov; 65(7):1306-1322. PubMed ID: 35466736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The correlation between drivers' road familiarity and glance behavior using real vehicle experimental data and mathematical models.
    Huang J; Hu Y; Hu L; Guo G; Gao K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 38709142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors affecting drivers' off-road glance behavior while interacting with in-vehicle voice interfaces.
    Zhang F; Roberts SC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jan; 179():106883. PubMed ID: 36356510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Driver's adaptive glance behavior to in-vehicle information systems.
    Peng Y; Boyle LN
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Dec; 85():93-101. PubMed ID: 26406538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using Sound to Reduce Visual Distraction from In-vehicle Human-Machine Interfaces.
    Larsson P; Niemand M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S25-30. PubMed ID: 26027972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Keep your eyes on the road: young driver crash risk increases according to duration of distraction.
    Simons-Morton BG; Guo F; Klauer SG; Ehsani JP; Pradhan AK
    J Adolesc Health; 2014 May; 54(5 Suppl):S61-7. PubMed ID: 24759443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in glance behaviour when using a visual eco-driving system - A field study.
    Ahlstrom C; Kircher K
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():414-423. PubMed ID: 27633238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of human-machine interface modality, specificity, and timing on driver performance and behavior while using vehicle automation.
    Wang M; Parker J; Wong N; Mehrotra S; Roberts SC; Kim W; Romo A; Horrey WJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107606. PubMed ID: 38733810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of Partial Automation on Driver Attention: A Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Gaspar J; Carney C
    Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1261-1276. PubMed ID: 30920852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments.
    Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():89-101. PubMed ID: 31280814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Driver response and recovery following automation initiated disengagement in real-world hands-free driving.
    Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 36988583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Address inputting while driving: a comparison of four alternative text input methods on in-vehicle navigation displays usability and driver distraction.
    Zhong Q; Guo G; Zhi J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(4):163-168. PubMed ID: 35319331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relative impact of smartwatch and smartphone use while driving on workload, attention, and driving performance.
    Perlman D; Samost A; Domel AG; Mehler B; Dobres J; Reimer B
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Feb; 75():8-16. PubMed ID: 30509540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patterns in transitions of visual attention during baseline driving and during interaction with visual-manual and voice-based interfaces.
    Reimer B; Mehler B; Muñoz M; Dobres J; Kidd D; Reagan IJ
    Ergonomics; 2021 Nov; 64(11):1429-1451. PubMed ID: 34018916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.