262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28158746)
1. Measuring trade-offs in nephrology: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments and conjoint analysis studies.
Clark MD; Szczepura A; Gumber A; Howard K; Moro D; Morton RL
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2018 Feb; 33(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 28158746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. COnsiderations of Nephrologists when SuggestIng Dialysis in Elderly patients with Renal failure (CONSIDER): a discrete choice experiment.
Foote C; Morton RL; Jardine M; Gallagher M; Brown M; Howard K; Cass A
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2302-9. PubMed ID: 25056337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preferences for aspects of antenatal and newborn screening: a systematic review.
Vass CM; Georgsson S; Ulph F; Payne K
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Apr; 19(1):131. PubMed ID: 30991967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Public preferences for establishing nephrology facilities in Greenland: estimating willingness-to-pay using a discrete choice experiment.
Kjær T; Bech M; Kronborg C; Mørkbak MR
Eur J Health Econ; 2013 Oct; 14(5):739-48. PubMed ID: 22975793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The experiences of adults who are on dialysis and waiting for a renal transplant from a deceased donor: a systematic review.
Burns T; Fernandez R; Stephens M
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Mar; 13(2):169-211. PubMed ID: 26447040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review.
Salloum RG; Shenkman EA; Louviere JJ; Chambers DA
Implement Sci; 2017 Nov; 12(1):140. PubMed ID: 29169397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.
Vass C; Gray E; Payne K
Int J Clin Pharm; 2016 Jun; 38(3):620-30. PubMed ID: 26610687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Public, medical professionals' and patients' preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: study protocol for discrete choice experiments.
Oedingen C; Bartling T; Krauth C
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e026040. PubMed ID: 30337317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mental health service preferences of patients and providers: a scoping review of conjoint analysis and discrete choice experiments from global public health literature over the last 20 years (1999-2019).
Larsen A; Tele A; Kumar M
BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jun; 21(1):589. PubMed ID: 34144685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preferences for Genetic Testing to Predict the Risk of Developing Hereditary Cancer: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.
Morrish N; Snowsill T; Dodman S; Medina-Lara A
Med Decis Making; 2024 Apr; 44(3):252-268. PubMed ID: 38323553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Eliciting Preferences in Dentistry with Multiattribute Stated Preference Methods: A Systematic Review.
Barber S; Pavitt S; Khambay B; Bekker H; Meads D
JDR Clin Trans Res; 2018 Oct; 3(4):326-335. PubMed ID: 30931788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Who should be prioritized for renal transplantation?: Analysis of key stakeholder preferences using discrete choice experiments.
Clark MD; Leech D; Gumber A; Moro D; Szczepura A; West N; Higgins R
BMC Nephrol; 2012 Nov; 13():152. PubMed ID: 23173887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stakeholders' preferences for the design and delivery of virtual care services: A systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Vo LK; Allen MJ; Cunich M; Thillainadesan J; McPhail SM; Sharma P; Wallis S; McGowan K; Carter HE
Soc Sci Med; 2024 Jan; 340():116459. PubMed ID: 38048738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Systematic Review Comparing the Acceptability, Validity and Concordance of Discrete Choice Experiments and Best-Worst Scaling for Eliciting Preferences in Healthcare.
Whitty JA; Oliveira Gonçalves AS
Patient; 2018 Jun; 11(3):301-317. PubMed ID: 29177797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Systematic Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis Studies in People with Multiple Sclerosis.
Webb EJD; Meads D; Eskyte I; King N; Dracup N; Chataway J; Ford HL; Marti J; Pavitt SH; Schmierer K; Manzano A
Patient; 2018 Aug; 11(4):391-402. PubMed ID: 29313265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Systematic and Critical Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Collacott H; Zhang D; Heidenreich S; Tervonen T
Patient; 2022 Jan; 15(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 34250574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual Preferences for Child and Adolescent Vaccine Attributes: A Systematic Review of the Stated Preference Literature.
Michaels-Igbokwe C; MacDonald S; Currie GR
Patient; 2017 Dec; 10(6):687-700. PubMed ID: 28474295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.
Whitty JA; Lancsar E; Rixon K; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
Patient; 2014; 7(4):365-86. PubMed ID: 24872225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review.
Pearce A; Harrison M; Watson V; Street DJ; Howard K; Bansback N; Bryan S
Patient; 2021 Jan; 14(1):17-53. PubMed ID: 33141359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient and caregiver preferences for home dialysis-the home first study: a protocol for qualitative interviews and discrete choice experiments.
Walker RC; Morton RL; Tong A; Marshall MR; Palmer S; Howard K
BMJ Open; 2015 Apr; 5(4):e007405. PubMed ID: 25877279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
