These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28158746)

  • 41. Reporting Quality of Marginal Rates of Substitution in Discrete Choice Experiments That Elicit Patient Preferences.
    Mott DJ; Chami N; Tervonen T
    Value Health; 2020 Aug; 23(8):979-984. PubMed ID: 32828225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A discrete-choice experiment to elicit preferences of patients with epilepsy for self-management programs.
    Atkinson-Clark E; Charokopou M; Van Osselaer N; Hiligsmann M
    Epilepsy Behav; 2018 Feb; 79():58-67. PubMed ID: 29248866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force.
    Reed Johnson F; Lancsar E; Marshall D; Kilambi V; Mühlbacher A; Regier DA; Bresnahan BW; Kanninen B; Bridges JF
    Value Health; 2013; 16(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 23337210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Stated Preference for Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 1990-2013.
    Mansfield C; Tangka FK; Ekwueme DU; Smith JL; Guy GP; Li C; Hauber AB
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2016 Feb; 13():E27. PubMed ID: 26916898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Nephrology around Europe: organization models and management strategies: Spain.
    de Francisco AL; Piñera C
    J Nephrol; 2011; 24(4):438-45. PubMed ID: 21688247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A systematic review of discrete choice experiments in stroke rehabilitation.
    Jolliffe L; Christie LJ; Fearn N; Nohrenberg M; Liu R; Williams JF; Parsons MW; Pearce AM
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2024 Sep; 31(6):632-643. PubMed ID: 38372124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Treatment Preferences for Cardiac Procedures of Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Design and Pilot Testing of a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Wilson T; Javaheri P; Finlay J; Hazlewood G; Wilton SB; Sajobi T; Levin A; Pearson W; Connolly C; James MT
    Can J Kidney Health Dis; 2021; 8():2054358120985375. PubMed ID: 33552527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Nephrologists' perceptions regarding dialysis withdrawal and palliative care in Europe: lessons from a European Renal Best Practice survey.
    van Biesen W; van de Luijtgaarden MW; Brown EA; Michel JP; van Munster BC; Jager KJ; van der Veer SN
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2015 Dec; 30(12):1951-8. PubMed ID: 26268713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Decision-making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: a discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency.
    Mirelman A; Mentzakis E; Kinter E; Paolucci F; Fordham R; Ozawa S; Ferraz M; Baltussen R; Niessen LW
    Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 22583464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Discrete choice experiments in pharmacy: a review of the literature.
    Naik-Panvelkar P; Armour C; Saini B
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2013 Feb; 21(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 23301529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Appendix to dialysis centre guidelines: recommendations for the relationship between outpatient haemodialysis centres and reference hospitals. Opinions from the Outpatient Dialysis Group. Grupo de Trabajo de Hemodiálisis Extrahospitalaria.
    Berdud I; Arenas MD; Bernat A; Ramos R; Blanco A;
    Nefrologia; 2011; 31(6):664-9. PubMed ID: 22130281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.
    Clark MD; Determann D; Petrou S; Moro D; de Bekker-Grob EW
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Sep; 32(9):883-902. PubMed ID: 25005924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Discrete Choice Experiments to Elicit Patient Preferences for Decision Making in Transplantation.
    James LJ; Wong G; Tong A; Craig JC; Howard K; Howell M
    Transplantation; 2021 May; 105(5):960-967. PubMed ID: 33093407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Patient Preferences for Breast Cancer Treatment Interventions: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Guerra RL; Castaneda L; de Albuquerque RCR; Ferreira CBT; Corrêa FM; Fernandes RRA; de Almeida LM
    Patient; 2019 Dec; 12(6):559-569. PubMed ID: 31321706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.
    Hauber AB; González JM; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; Prior T; Marshall DA; Cunningham C; IJzerman MJ; Bridges JF
    Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):300-15. PubMed ID: 27325321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Prospective, multicenter, controlled study of quality of life, psychological adjustment process and medical outcomes of patients receiving a preemptive kidney transplant compared to a similar population of recipients after a dialysis period of less than three years--The PreKit-QoL study protocol.
    Sébille V; Hardouin JB; Giral M; Bonnaud-Antignac A; Tessier P; Papuchon E; Jobert A; Faurel-Paul E; Gentile S; Cassuto E; Morélon E; Rostaing L; Glotz D; Sberro-Soussan R; Foucher Y; Meurette A
    BMC Nephrol; 2016 Jan; 17():11. PubMed ID: 26785745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Using Latent Class Analysis to Model Preference Heterogeneity in Health: A Systematic Review.
    Zhou M; Thayer WM; Bridges JFP
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Feb; 36(2):175-187. PubMed ID: 28975582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Simulation study to determine the impact of different design features on design efficiency in discrete choice experiments.
    Vanniyasingam T; Cunningham CE; Foster G; Thabane L
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e011985. PubMed ID: 27436671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. One size does not fit all: HIV testing preferences differ among high-risk groups in Northern Tanzania.
    Ostermann J; Njau B; Mtuy T; Brown DS; Mühlbacher A; Thielman N
    AIDS Care; 2015; 27(5):595-603. PubMed ID: 25616562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluating migraineurs' preferences for migraine treatment outcomes using a choice experiment.
    Gonzalez JM; Johnson FR; Runken MC; Poulos CM
    Headache; 2013; 53(10):1635-50. PubMed ID: 23808578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.