These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 281592)
1. Genetic control and the law. Grant MA Med Trial Tech Q; 1978; 24(3):306-27. PubMed ID: 281592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The constitutionality of mandatory genetic screening statutes. Adelman CS Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1981; 31(4):897-948. PubMed ID: 11652405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetics and the law: bibliography. Lockwood B Emory Law J; 1990; 39(3):875-936. PubMed ID: 11653911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetics, eugenics, and public policy. Smith GP South Ill Univ Law J; 1985; 1985(3):435-53. PubMed ID: 11649816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic information and third party access to information: New Jersey's pioneering legislation as a model for federal privacy protection of genetic information. Stepanuk NA Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1998; 47(3):1105-44. PubMed ID: 11660610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reconciling property law with advances in reproductive science. Brown B Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995; 6(2):73-88. PubMed ID: 11655141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Birthright or life sentence: controlling the threat of genetic testing. Nobles K South Calif Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):2081-128. PubMed ID: 11659655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The prospect of private unauthorized eugenics and ten feet tall basketball players: a case of legislative oversight? Meredith RD J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1985; 1(1):155-72. PubMed ID: 11645591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Who's afraid of the human genome? Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):19-21. PubMed ID: 2745060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal trends in bioethics. Davis DS J Clin Ethics; 1997; 8(2):204-7. PubMed ID: 9302641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Genome project forces new look at ethics, law. Peters T Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1993; 8(3):5-13. PubMed ID: 11652664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Remedies for improper disclosure of genetic data. Riskin LL; Reilly P Rutgers Camden Law J; 1977; 8(3):480-506. PubMed ID: 11663039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Manipulating the genetic code: jurisprudential conundrums. Smith GP Georgetown Law J; 1976 Feb; 64(3):697-733. PubMed ID: 11660899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. New genetic medicine and public opinion. Howse JL Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1993; 8(3):29-33. PubMed ID: 11652663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The dispersion of genetic technologies and the law. Clayton EW Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(3 Suppl):S13-5. PubMed ID: 11654184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The new genetic age: do our genes make us disabled individuals under the Americans with Disabilities Act? Dichter MS; Sutor SE Villanova Law Rev; 1997; 42(2):613-33. PubMed ID: 11657553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethical aspects of genetic testing. Fruchtman CE; Pizzulli FC Whittier Law Rev; 1998; 20(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 11660804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond abortion: human genetics and the new eugenics. Harding JR Pepperdine Law Rev; 1991; 18(1):471-512. PubMed ID: 11659992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]