181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28159337)
1. Normal computerized Q wave measurements in healthy young athletes.
Saini D; Grober AF; Hadley D; Froelicher V
J Electrocardiol; 2017; 50(3):316-322. PubMed ID: 28159337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three ECG criteria for athlete pre-participation screening.
Pickham D; Zarafshar S; Sani D; Kumar N; Froelicher V
J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(6):769-74. PubMed ID: 25155389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized Q wave dimensions in athletes and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients.
Bent RE; Wheeler MT; Hadley D; Froelicher V; Ashley E; Perez MV
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 25732098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevalence of abnormal electrocardiograms in Swiss elite athletes detected with modern screening criteria.
Perrin T; Trachsel LD; Schneiter S; Menafoglio A; Albrecht S; Pirrello T; Eser P; Roten L; Gojanovic B; Wilhelm M
Swiss Med Wkly; 2016; 146():w14376. PubMed ID: 28102875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are the QRS duration and ST depression cut-points from the Seattle criteria too conservative?
Dunn T; Abdelfattah R; Aggarwal S; Pickham D; Hadley D; Froelicher V
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 25796099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Addition of the electrocardiogram to the preparticipation examination of college athletes.
Le VV; Wheeler MT; Mandic S; Dewey F; Fonda H; Perez M; Sungar G; Garza D; Ashley EA; Matheson G; Froelicher V
Clin J Sport Med; 2010 Mar; 20(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 20215891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Examining QRS amplitude criteria for electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in recommendations for screening criteria in athletes.
Singla V; Jindal A; Pargaonkar V; Soofi M; Wheeler M; Froelicher V
J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(3):368-72. PubMed ID: 25661864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of sport on computerized electrocardiogram measurements in college athletes.
Gademan MG; Uberoi A; Le VV; Mandic S; van Oort ER; Myers J; Froelicher VF
Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2012 Feb; 19(1):126-38. PubMed ID: 21450619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrocardiographic abnormalities in elite high school athletes: comparison to adolescent hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Thompson AJ; Cannon BC; Wackel PL; Horner JM; Ackerman MJ; O'Leary PW; Eidem BW; Johnson JN
Br J Sports Med; 2016 Jan; 50(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 26729893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual or computer-based measurements: important for interpretation of athletes' ECG.
Berge HM; Steine K; Andersen TE; Solberg EE; Gjesdal K
Br J Sports Med; 2014 May; 48(9):761-7. PubMed ID: 24563390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Large Q and S waves in lead III on the electrocardiogram distinguish patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from athletes.
Chen AS; Bent RE; Wheeler M; Knowles JW; Haddad F; Froelicher V; Ashley E; Perez MV
Heart; 2018 Nov; 104(22):1871-1877. PubMed ID: 29680808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of gender on computerized electrocardiogram measurements in college athletes.
Mandic S; Fonda H; Dewey F; Le VV; Stein R; Wheeler M; Ashley EA; Myers J; Froelicher VF
Phys Sportsmed; 2010 Jun; 38(2):156-64. PubMed ID: 20631475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrocardiogram interpretation in NCAA athletes: Comparison of the 'Seattle' and 'International' criteria.
Hyde N; Prutkin JM; Drezner JA
J Electrocardiol; 2019; 56():81-84. PubMed ID: 31326858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New electrocardiographic criteria to differentiate the Type-2 Brugada pattern from electrocardiogram of healthy athletes with r'-wave in leads V1/V2.
Serra G; Baranchuk A; Bayés-De-Luna A; Brugada J; Goldwasser D; Capulzini L; Arazo D; Boraita A; Heras ME; Garcia-Niebla J; Elosua R; Brugada R; Brugada P
Europace; 2014 Nov; 16(11):1639-45. PubMed ID: 24603955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Normal values of the electrocardiogram for ages 16-90 years.
Rijnbeek PR; van Herpen G; Bots ML; Man S; Verweij N; Hofman A; Hillege H; Numans ME; Swenne CA; Witteman JC; Kors JA
J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(6):914-21. PubMed ID: 25194872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A gender-based analysis of high school athletes using computerized electrocardiogram measurements.
Kumar N; Saini D; Froelicher V
PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e53365. PubMed ID: 23301064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrocardiogram interpretation in college athletes: Local institution versus sports cardiology center interpretation.
Petek BJ; Drezner JA; Prutkin JM; Owens DS; Tran T; Harmon KG
J Electrocardiol; 2020; 62():49-56. PubMed ID: 32814150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gender differences in the electrocardiogram screening of athletes.
Bessem B; de Bruijn MC; Nieuwland W
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Feb; 20(2):213-217. PubMed ID: 27451270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of 12-lead electrocardiogram in top competitive professional athletes in the light of recent guidelines.
Swiatowiec A; Król W; Kuch M; Braksator W; Krysztofiak H; Dłuzniewski M; Mamcarz A
Kardiol Pol; 2009 Oct; 67(10):1095-102. PubMed ID: 20017075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Stanford ECG Left Atrial Criteria With the International ECG Criteria for Sports Screening.
Hock J; Wheeler M; Singh T; Ha LD; Hadley D; Froelicher V
Clin J Sport Med; 2021 Jul; 31(4):388-391. PubMed ID: 31743221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
