These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28161173)

  • 1. Short communication: The combined use of linkage disequilibrium-based haploblocks and allele frequency-based haplotype selection methods enhances genomic evaluation accuracy in dairy cattle.
    Jónás D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):2905-2908. PubMed ID: 28161173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternative haplotype construction methods for genomic evaluation.
    Jónás D; Ducrocq V; Fouilloux MN; Croiseau P
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jun; 99(6):4537-4546. PubMed ID: 26995132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic prediction of genetic merit using LD-based haplotypes in the Nordic Holstein population.
    Cuyabano BC; Su G; Lund MS
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):1171. PubMed ID: 25539631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
    Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Druet T
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4708-14. PubMed ID: 21854945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fixed-length haplotypes can improve genomic prediction accuracy in an admixed dairy cattle population.
    Hess M; Druet T; Hess A; Garrick D
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jul; 49(1):54. PubMed ID: 28673233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breeding value estimation for fat percentage using dense markers on Bos taurus autosome 14.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Mullaart E; Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4821-9. PubMed ID: 17881705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-frequency marker haplotypes in the genomic selection of dairy cattle.
    Mucha A; Wierzbicki H; Kamiński S; Oleński K; Hering D
    J Appl Genet; 2019 May; 60(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30877657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic predictions based on haplotypes fitted as pseudo-SNP for milk production and udder type traits and SCS in French dairy goats.
    Teissier M; Larroque H; Brito LF; Rupp R; Schenkel FS; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Dec; 103(12):11559-11573. PubMed ID: 33041034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
    Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of genomic evaluations in Holstein-Friesians using haplotypes based on the BovineHD BeadChip.
    Schopen GC; Schrooten C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(12):7945-51. PubMed ID: 24140319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic Prediction Accuracy Using Haplotypes Defined by Size and Hierarchical Clustering Based on Linkage Disequilibrium.
    Won S; Park JE; Son JH; Lee SH; Park BH; Park M; Park WC; Chai HH; Kim H; Lee J; Lim D
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():134. PubMed ID: 32211021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extent of linkage disequilibrium, consistency of gametic phase, and imputation accuracy within and across Canadian dairy breeds.
    Larmer SG; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 May; 97(5):3128-41. PubMed ID: 24582440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SNP- and haplotype-based single-step genomic predictions for body weight, wool, and reproductive traits in North American Rambouillet sheep.
    Araujo AC; Carneiro PLS; Oliveira HR; Lewis RM; Brito LF
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 Mar; 140(2):216-234. PubMed ID: 36408677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic predictions in purebreds with a multibreed genomic relationship matrix1.
    Steyn Y; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Nov; 97(11):4418-4427. PubMed ID: 31539424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups.
    Naderi S; Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Sep; 99(9):7261-7273. PubMed ID: 27344385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short communication: Characterization of the genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in 2 divergent selection lines of dairy cows.
    Banos G; Coffey MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Jun; 93(6):2775-8. PubMed ID: 20494187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
    Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.