212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28161205)
1. Comparison of three-dimensional scanner systems for craniomaxillofacial imaging.
Knoops PG; Beaumont CA; Borghi A; Rodriguez-Florez N; Breakey RW; Rodgers W; Angullia F; Jeelani NU; Schievano S; Dunaway DJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Apr; 70(4):441-449. PubMed ID: 28161205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional surface scanners compared with standard anthropometric measurements for head shape.
Beaumont CAA; Knoops PGM; Borghi A; Jeelani NUO; Koudstaal MJ; Schievano S; Dunaway DJ; Rodriguez-Florez N
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 45(6):921-927. PubMed ID: 28454666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry: Comparison of the 3dMD and Bellus3D facial scanning systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
Liu J; Zhang C; Cai R; Yao Y; Zhao Z; Liao W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Dec; 160(6):862-871. PubMed ID: 34814981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the 3dMDface system as a tool for soft tissue analysis.
Hong C; Choi K; Kachroo Y; Kwon T; Nguyen A; McComb R; Moon W
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Jun; 20 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):119-124. PubMed ID: 28643910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Precision and accuracy of the 3dMD photogrammetric system in craniomaxillofacial application.
Lübbers HT; Medinger L; Kruse A; Grätz KW; Matthews F
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):763-7. PubMed ID: 20485043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Vectra H1 portable three-dimensional photogrammetry system for facial imaging.
Camison L; Bykowski M; Lee WW; Carlson JC; Roosenboom J; Goldstein JA; Losee JE; Weinberg SM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 47(3):403-410. PubMed ID: 28919165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The 3dMD photogrammetric photo system in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: Validation of interexaminer variations and perceptions.
Nord F; Ferjencik R; Seifert B; Lanzer M; Gander T; Matthews F; Rücker M; Lübbers HT
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 43(9):1798-803. PubMed ID: 26421470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of three-dimensional facial imaging captured with smartphone-based photogrammetry application in comparison to stereophotogrammetry system.
Andrews J; Alwafi A; Bichu YM; Pliska BT; Mostafa N; Zou B
Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e15834. PubMed ID: 37180897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.
Weinberg SM; Scott NM; Neiswanger K; Brandon CA; Marazita ML
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Sep; 41(5):507-18. PubMed ID: 15352857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of low-cost mobile phone applications and comparison with professional imaging systems for three-dimensional facial imaging: A pilot study.
Loy RCH; Liew MKM; Yong CW; Wong RCW
J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104676. PubMed ID: 37633483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of two handheld devices against a non-portable three-dimensional surface scanner and assessment of potential use for intraoperative facial imaging.
Koban KC; Perko P; Etzel L; Li Z; Schenck TL; Giunta RE
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Jan; 73(1):141-148. PubMed ID: 31519501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of a low-cost laser scanner device for the assessment of three-dimensional facial anatomy in living subjects.
Gibelli D; Pucciarelli V; Caplova Z; Cappella A; Dolci C; Cattaneo C; Sforza C
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 46(9):1493-1499. PubMed ID: 30196857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
Weinberg SM; Naidoo S; Govier DP; Martin RA; Kane AA; Marazita ML
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 May; 17(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 16770184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy and reproducibility of the DAVID SLS-2 scanner in three-dimensional facial imaging.
Secher JJ; Darvann TA; Pinholt EM
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 45(10):1662-1670. PubMed ID: 28847623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Facial asymmetry assessment in adults using three-dimensional surface imaging.
Patel A; Islam SM; Murray K; Goonewardene MS
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():36. PubMed ID: 26490376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [3D-imaging and analysis for plastic surgery by smartphone and tablet: an alternative to professional systems?].
Koban KC; Leitsch S; Holzbach T; Volkmer E; Metz PM; Giunta RE
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2014 Apr; 46(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 24777459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated landmark extraction for orthodontic measurement of faces using the 3-camera photogrammetry methodology.
Deli R; Di Gioia E; Galantucci LM; Percoco G
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 20072024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Registration of 3-dimensional facial photographs for clinical use.
Maal TJ; van Loon B; Plooij JM; Rangel F; Ettema AM; Borstlap WA; Bergé SJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2391-401. PubMed ID: 20708318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chances and limitations of a low-cost mobile 3D scanner for breast imaging in comparison to an established 3D photogrammetric system.
Koban KC; Härtnagl F; Titze V; Schenck TL; Giunta RE
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Oct; 71(10):1417-1423. PubMed ID: 29970344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
