641 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28162884)
1. The influence of three-dimensional planning on decision-making in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BS; Hudek R; Burkhart KJ; Gohlke F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1477-1483. PubMed ID: 28162884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle: a new measurement of glenoid inclination for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Boileau P; Gauci MO; Wagner ER; Clowez G; Chaoui J; Chelli M; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Jul; 28(7):1281-1290. PubMed ID: 30935825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgeon acceptance of an initial 3D glenoid preoperative plan: rates and risk factors.
Hartzler RU; Denard PJ; Griffin JW; Werner BC; Romeo AA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):787-794. PubMed ID: 32650080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated Three-Dimensional Measurement of Glenoid Version and Inclination in Arthritic Shoulders.
Boileau P; Cheval D; Gauci MO; Holzer N; Chaoui J; Walch G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jan; 100(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 29298261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative planning for accurate glenoid component positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Berhouet J; Gulotta LV; Dines DM; Craig E; Warren RF; Choi D; Chen X; Kontaxis A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 May; 103(3):407-413. PubMed ID: 28238965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic characterization of the B2 glenoid: the effect of computed tomographic axis orientation.
Chalmers PN; Salazar D; Chamberlain A; Keener JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Feb; 26(2):258-264. PubMed ID: 27592372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability and reliability of 2-dimensional vs. 3-dimensional glenoid version measurements with 3-dimensional preoperative planning software.
Reid JJ; Kunkle BF; Greene AT; Eichinger JK; Friedman RJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 34411724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability analysis of glenoid component inclination measurements on postoperative radiographs and computed tomography-based 3D models in total and reversed shoulder arthroplasty patients.
Van Haver A; Heylen S; Vuylsteke K; Declercq G; Verborgt O
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Apr; 25(4):632-40. PubMed ID: 26652701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The implications of the glenoid angles and rotator cuff status in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.
Ozel O; Hudek R; Abdrabou MS; Werner BS; Gohlke F
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Oct; 21(1):668. PubMed ID: 33036604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is preoperative planning effective for intraoperative glenoid implant size and type selection during anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
Raiss P; Walch G; Wittmann T; Athwal GS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2123-2127. PubMed ID: 32340791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion.
Boileau P; Morin-Salvo N; Gauci MO; Seeto BL; Chalmers PN; Holzer N; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Dec; 26(12):2133-2142. PubMed ID: 28735842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional measures of posterior bone loss and retroversion in Walch B2 glenoids predict the need for an augmented anatomic glenoid component.
Cronin KJ; Kirsch JM; Gates S; Patel MS; Joyce CD; Hill BW; Gutman MJ; Williams GR; Namdari S
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2386-2392. PubMed ID: 33753274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determining glenoid component version after total shoulder arthroplasty.
Mehta MP; Vogel LA; Shiu BB; Dennis ER; Petkovic D; Levine WN; Jobin CM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Sep; 27(9):1588-1595. PubMed ID: 29759906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Preoperative Implant Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Hamilton MA; Polakovic S; Saadi P; Jones RB; Parsons IM; Cheung EV
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S47-51. PubMed ID: 26631196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Glenoid morphology in light of anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a dissection- and 3D-CT-based study in male and female body donors.
Mathews S; Burkhard M; Serrano N; Link K; Häusler M; Frater N; Franke I; Bischofberger H; Buck FM; Gascho D; Thali M; Serowy S; Müller-Gerbl M; Harper G; Qureshi F; Böni T; Bloch HR; Ullrich O; Rühli FJ; Eppler E
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jan; 18(1):9. PubMed ID: 28068966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient-specific glenoid guides provide accuracy and reproducibility in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Gauci MO; Boileau P; Baba M; Chaoui J; Walch G
Bone Joint J; 2016 Aug; 98-B(8):1080-5. PubMed ID: 27482021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of patient-specific guided implantation of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty.
Verborgt O; Hachem AI; Eid K; Vuylsteke K; Ferrand M; Hardy P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Oct; 104(6):767-772. PubMed ID: 29505820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of surgeon variability in preoperative planning of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a quantitative comparison of 49 cases planned by 9 surgeons.
Parsons M; Greene A; Polakovic S; Byram I; Cheung E; Jones R; Papandrea R; Youderian A; Wright T; Flurin PH; Zuckerman J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2080-2088. PubMed ID: 32471752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis and 3D correction of glenoid dysplasia with metal hemi-wedge base plate augment: short-term radiographic outcomes.
Guehring T; Navas L; Westrich J; Zimmerer A; Schmidt S; Barrientos M; Ulmar B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Aug; 143(8):4763-4772. PubMed ID: 36705760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BS; Chaoui J; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Oct; 26(10):1726-1731. PubMed ID: 28528016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
