These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28163056)

  • 61. Endocrine disrupting chemicals and other substances of concern in food contact materials: an updated review of exposure, effect and risk assessment.
    Muncke J
    J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol; 2011 Oct; 127(1-2):118-27. PubMed ID: 21073950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62.
    Benigni R; Bassan A; Pavan M
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2020 Aug; 16(8):651-662. PubMed ID: 32567390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. An effect-directed strategy for characterizing emerging chemicals in food contact materials made from paper and board.
    Rosenmai AK; Bengtström L; Taxvig C; Trier X; Petersen JH; Svingen T; Binderup ML; Barbara Medea Alice VV; Dybdahl M; Granby K; Vinggaard AM
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2017 Aug; 106(Pt A):250-259. PubMed ID: 28571769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Establishing the level of safety concern for chemicals in food without the need for toxicity testing.
    Schilter B; Benigni R; Boobis A; Chiodini A; Cockburn A; Cronin MT; Lo Piparo E; Modi S; Thiel A; Worth A
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Mar; 68(2):275-96. PubMed ID: 24012706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Integrated approach to assess the domain of applicability of some commercial (Q)SAR models.
    Kulkarni SA; Zhu J
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2008; 19(1-2):39-54. PubMed ID: 18311633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Characterization and validation of an in silico toxicology model to predict the mutagenic potential of drug impurities.
    Valerio LG; Cross KP
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2012 May; 260(3):209-21. PubMed ID: 22426359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Publicly-accessible QSAR software tools developed by the Joint Research Centre.
    Pavan M; Worth AP
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2008; 19(7-8):785-99. PubMed ID: 19061088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Suitability of the Ames test to characterise genotoxicity of food contact material migrates.
    Rainer B; Pinter E; Czerny T; Riegel E; Kirchnawy C; Marin-Kuan M; Schilter B; Tacker M
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2018 Nov; 35(11):2230-2243. PubMed ID: 30257137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Comparative evaluation of in silico systems for ames test mutagenicity prediction: scope and limitations.
    Hillebrecht A; Muster W; Brigo A; Kansy M; Weiser T; Singer T
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 Jun; 24(6):843-54. PubMed ID: 21534561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Evaluation of in silico tools to predict the skin sensitization potential of chemicals.
    Verheyen GR; Braeken E; Van Deun K; Van Miert S
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 Jan; 28(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 28105856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. In silico prediction of chemical Ames mutagenicity.
    Xu C; Cheng F; Chen L; Du Z; Li W; Liu G; Lee PW; Tang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Nov; 52(11):2840-7. PubMed ID: 23030379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. It's difficult, but important, to make negative predictions.
    Williams RV; Amberg A; Brigo A; Coquin L; Giddings A; Glowienke S; Greene N; Jolly R; Kemper R; O'Leary-Steele C; Parenty A; Spirkl HP; Stalford SA; Weiner SK; Wichard J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Apr; 76():79-86. PubMed ID: 26785392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Evaluation of aromatic amines with different purities and different solvent vehicles in the Ames test.
    Harding AP; Popelier PL; Harvey J; Giddings A; Foster G; Kranz M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 25542092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. (Q)SAR: A Tool for the Toxicologist.
    Steinbach T; Gad-McDonald S; Kruhlak N; Powley M; Greene N
    Int J Toxicol; 2015; 34(4):352-4. PubMed ID: 25979517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Assessing the impact of expert knowledge on ICH M7 (Q)SAR predictions. Is expert review still needed?
    Jayasekara PS; Skanchy SK; Kim MT; Kumaran G; Mugabe BE; Woodard LE; Yang J; Zych AJ; Kruhlak NL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Oct; 125():105006. PubMed ID: 34273441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Quantifying the benefits of using read-across and in silico techniques to fulfill hazard data requirements for chemical categories.
    Stanton K; Kruszewski FH
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Nov; 81():250-259. PubMed ID: 27612993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Assessment of the sensitivity of the computational programs DEREK, TOPKAT, and MCASE in the prediction of the genotoxicity of pharmaceutical molecules.
    Snyder RD; Pearl GS; Mandakas G; Choy WN; Goodsaid F; Rosenblum IY
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2004; 43(3):143-58. PubMed ID: 15065202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Validation of Toxtree and SciQSAR in silico predictive software using a publicly available benchmark mutagenicity database and their applicability for the qualification of impurities in pharmaceuticals.
    Contrera JF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Nov; 67(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 23969001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. In silico methods combined with expert knowledge rule out mutagenic potential of pharmaceutical impurities: an industry survey.
    Dobo KL; Greene N; Fred C; Glowienke S; Harvey JS; Hasselgren C; Jolly R; Kenyon MO; Munzner JB; Muster W; Neft R; Reddy MV; White AT; Weiner S
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Apr; 62(3):449-55. PubMed ID: 22321701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Results of a round-robin exercise on read-across.
    Benfenati E; Belli M; Borges T; Casimiro E; Cester J; Fernandez A; Gini G; Honma M; Kinzl M; Knauf R; Manganaro A; Mombelli E; Petoumenou MI; Paparella M; Paris P; Raitano G
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2016 May; 27(5):371-84. PubMed ID: 27167159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.