BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28163372)

  • 1. More Evidence for Three Types of Cognitive Style: Validating the Object-Spatial Imagery and Verbal Questionnaire Using Eye Tracking when Learning with Texts and Pictures.
    Höffler TN; Koć-Januchta M; Leutner D
    Appl Cogn Psychol; 2017; 31(1):109-115. PubMed ID: 28163372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial versus object visualizers: a new characterization of visual cognitive style.
    Kozhevnikov M; Kosslyn S; Shephard J
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Jun; 33(4):710-26. PubMed ID: 16248335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Object-Spatial Imagery and Verbal Cognitive Styles in High School Students.
    Haciomeroglu ES; LaVenia M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2017 Jun; 124(3):689-702. PubMed ID: 28514923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eye-tracking technology in identifying visualizers and verbalizers: data on eye-movement differences and detection accuracy.
    Luo Z; Wang Y
    Data Brief; 2019 Oct; 26():104447. PubMed ID: 31667221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factor structure of the Spanish version of the Object-Spatial Imagery and Verbal Questionnaire.
    Campos A; Pérez-Fabello MJ
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Apr; 108(2):470-6. PubMed ID: 21675561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognitive styles and mental rotation ability in map learning.
    Pazzaglia F; Moè A
    Cogn Process; 2013 Nov; 14(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 23771207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loss of form vision impairs spatial imagery.
    Occelli V; Lin JB; Lacey S; Sathian K
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():159. PubMed ID: 24678294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Internal consistency and construct validity of two versions of the Revised Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire.
    Campos A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Oct; 113(2):454-60. PubMed ID: 22185060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Verbal descriptions of spatial information can interfere with picture processing.
    Schüler A; Scheiter K; Gerjets P
    Memory; 2012; 20(7):682-99. PubMed ID: 22734801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does processing style affect recall of the Rey-Osterrieth or Taylor complex figures?
    Casey MB; Winner E; Hurwitz I; DaSilva D
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1991 Jul; 13(4):600-6. PubMed ID: 1918289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Creativity, visualization abilities, and visual cognitive style.
    Kozhevnikov M; Kozhevnikov M; Yu CJ; Blazhenkova O
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2013 Jun; 83(Pt 2):196-209. PubMed ID: 23692530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brain activities of visual thinkers and verbal thinkers: A MEG study.
    Nishimura K; Aoki T; Inagawa M; Tobinaga Y; Iwaki S
    Neurosci Lett; 2015 May; 594():155-60. PubMed ID: 25818330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eye movements and mental imagery during reading of literary texts with different narrative styles.
    Magyari L; Mangen A; Kuzmičová A; Jacobs AM; Lüdtke J
    J Eye Mov Res; 2020 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33828798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vividness of Object and Spatial Imagery.
    Blazhenkova O
    Percept Mot Skills; 2016 Apr; 122(2):490-508. PubMed ID: 27166329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in reported visual imagery and memory performance.
    McKelvie SJ; Demers EG
    Br J Psychol; 1979 Feb; 70(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 486866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in reported visual imagery and cognitive performance.
    McKelvie SJ; Rohrberg MM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Apr; 46(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 662544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Specifying the boundary conditions of the multimedia effect: The influence of content and its distribution between text and pictures.
    Schüler A; Pazzaglia F; Scheiter K
    Br J Psychol; 2019 Feb; 110(1):126-150. PubMed ID: 30125352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance.
    Riding R; Douglas G
    Br J Educ Psychol; 1993 Jun; 63 ( Pt 2)():297-307. PubMed ID: 8353062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Different Dimensions of Cognitive Style in Typical and Atypical Cognition: New Evidence and a New Measurement Tool.
    Mealor AD; Simner J; Rothen N; Carmichael DA; Ward J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155483. PubMed ID: 27191169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Object and spatial visualizers have different object-processing patterns: behavioral and ERP evidence.
    Li S; Gong D; Jia S; Zhang W; Ma Y
    Neuroreport; 2011 Dec; 22(17):860-4. PubMed ID: 21968324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.