140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28163477)
1. A comparative study on evaluation of role of 1.5 mm microplates and 2.0 mm standard miniplates in management of mandibular fractures using bite force as indicator of recommendation.
Ahmed SS; Rehman SA; Ansari MK; Khan AA; Farooq O; Khan AH
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2016; 7(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 28163477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of bite forces in patients after treatment of mandibular fractures with miniplate osteosynthesis and internal locking miniplate osteosynthesis.
Kumar S; Gattumeedhi SR; Sankhla B; Garg A; Ingle E; Dagli N
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2014 Nov; 4(Suppl 1):S26-31. PubMed ID: 25452924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of biting force when using a combination of one microplate and one miniplate versus two miniplates for fixation of parasymphyseal mandibular fracture: the use of microplates for parasymphyseal mandibular fracture.
Zaky MM; Fayed NA; Shehab MF
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Mar; 24(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 31713697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bite force evaluation of mandibular fractures treated with microplates and miniplates.
Gupta A; Singh V; Mohammad S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1903-8. PubMed ID: 22695018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bite Force Evaluation of Conventional Plating System Versus Locking Plating System for Mandibular Fracture.
Giri KY; Sahu P; Rastogi S; Dandriyal R; Mall S; Singh AP; Indra B NP; Pratap Singh H
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2015 Dec; 14(4):972-8. PubMed ID: 26604472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing bite force in 2-mm locking plates versus 2-mm standard plates in treatment of mandibular fractures.
Agarwal M; Mohammad S; Singh RK; Singh V
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21272972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of bite force analytical study following mandibular osteosysthesis using three-dimensional and conventional locking miniplates.
Kinra PK; Jayakumar K; Soumithran CS; Michael MJ; Passi D; Singh M
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2017; 8(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 28761274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bite force measurement in mandibular parasymphyseal fractures: a preliminary clinical study.
Kshirsagar R; Jaggi N; Halli R
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr; 2011 Dec; 4(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 23205177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is "Bite force" a reliable parameter to compare masticatory efficiency restoration following ORIF of anterior mandibular fractures?
Patel S; Bhimani K; Narsingyani R; Bhatti Z; Savani R
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2022; 12(6):777-781. PubMed ID: 36159067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative biomechanical study on three miniplates osteosynthesis systems for stabilisation of low condylar fractures of the mandible.
Hakim SG; Wolf M; Wendlandt R; Kimmerle H; Sieg P; Jacobsen HC
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 52(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 24629455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of Microplates versus Miniplates in the Management of Maxillofacial Fractures.
Mittal G; Agarwal A; Garg R; Sharma S; Rathi A; Kapse P
Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2020; 10(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 32855911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical evaluation of Le Fort I maxillary fracture plating techniques.
Wang H; Chen MS; Fan YB; Tang W; Tian WD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jun; 65(6):1109-16. PubMed ID: 17517293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Locking Miniplate Osteosynthesis of Anterior Mandibular Fractures-Quo Vadis?
Desai V; Jain MK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 May; 77(5):1041.e1-1041.e9. PubMed ID: 30796907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of mechanical stress in symphyseal fractured human mandible reduced with miniplates during mastication.
Wang H; Ji B; Jiang W; Liu L; Zhang P; Tang W; Tian W; Fan Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1585-92. PubMed ID: 20434254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of 1.5 mm microplates in treatment of symphyseal fracture of mandible: A stress analysis based comparative study.
Ahmed SS; Bhardwaj S; Ansari MK; Farooq O; Khan AA
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2017; 7(2):119-122. PubMed ID: 28706786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Miniplate fixation of fractures of the symphyseal and parasymphyseal regions of the mandible: a review of 218 patients.
Lee T; Sawhney R; Ducic Y
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2013 Mar; 15(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 23303108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Z-shaped Miniplates vs Conventional Miniplates for Fixation of Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures.
Abdou Ata MAE; Marzook HAM; Tawfik MA; Elmissiry ZMA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Oct; 24(10):761-770. PubMed ID: 38152909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative Evaluation of Masticatory Bite Force in Mandible Fractures Treated with Three-Dimensional Curved Locking Strut Plate Versus Straight Locking Miniplate.
Virk SK; Gumber TK; Dhawan A; Bhullar RS; Kapila S
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2023 Dec; 22(4):1006-1021. PubMed ID: 38105849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bite Force as a Parameter for Comparison Between Three-Dimensional and Standard Titanium Miniplates for the Management of Anterior Mandibular Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.
Jain MK; Kerur P
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2019 Jun; 18(2):249-255. PubMed ID: 30996547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bite forces after open or closed treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures.
Ellis E; Throckmorton GS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 59(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 11289168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
