These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28163860)

  • 1. Refinement of Intraocular Pressure Measurements made by Ocular Response Analyzer following Laser in Situ Keratomileusis using M2 90 Moria Microkeratome for Egyptian Myopic and Astigmatic Patients.
    Refai TA; Hassanin OA
    Electron Physician; 2016 Dec; 8(12):3429-3433. PubMed ID: 28163860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW
    J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following Femto-LASIK using Goldman applanation tonometry and ocular response analyzer.
    Hemida AY; Said OM; Abdel-Meguid AAE; Iqbal M; Badawi AE
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2020; 13(5):782-787. PubMed ID: 32420226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
    Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Goldmann and modified Goldmann tonometry measuring intraocular pressure changes in eyes which underwent myopic laser in situ Keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy.
    Ang RET; Rixon A; Kilgore K; Schweitzer J
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):503. PubMed ID: 36539706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients.
    Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraocular Pressure Changes and Relationship With Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE and FS-LASIK.
    Li H; Wang Y; Dou R; Wei P; Zhang J; Zhao W; Li L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 57(10):4180-6. PubMed ID: 27548888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
    Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
    Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 24(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 18500086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in ocular response analyzer parameters after LASIK.
    Chen S; Chen D; Wang J; Lu F; Wang Q; Qu J
    J Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 26(4):279-88. PubMed ID: 20415324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraocular pressure after myopic laser refractive surgery measured with a new Goldmann convex prism: correlations with GAT and ORA.
    Iglesias M; Kudsieh B; Laiseca A; Santos C; Nadal J; Barraquer R; Casaroli-Marano RP
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):79. PubMed ID: 35168601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of cornea on intraocular pressure measurement by ICARE PRO and ORA.
    Pluháček F; Unzeitigová A; Marešová K; Rybář J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2019; 75(3):111-118. PubMed ID: 31779459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of intraocular pressure adjusted by central corneal thickness or corneal biomechanical properties as measured in glaucomatous eyes using noncontact tonometers and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Yaoeda K; Fukushima A; Shirakashi M; Fukuchi T
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2016; 10():829-34. PubMed ID: 27274187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraocular Pressure Changes in Myopic Patients Undergoing Laser In-Situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy.
    Humayun S; Bangash YW; Ishaq M; Shah AA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2023 Oct; 33(10):1148-1152. PubMed ID: 37804021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after corneal refractive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang H; Sun Z; Li L; Sun R; Zhang H
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):23. PubMed ID: 31924174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry.
    Pepose JS; Feigenbaum SK; Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Roberts CJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 17188041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes, post surface and post lamellar refractive surgery.
    Shousha SM; Abo Steit MA; Hosny MH; Ewais WA; Shalaby AM
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2013; 7():71-9. PubMed ID: 23326186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraocular pressure measurement by three different tonometers in primary congenital glaucoma.
    Zareei A; Razeghinejad MR; Nowroozzadeh MH; Mehrabi Y; Aghazadeh-Amiri M
    J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2015; 10(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 26005552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements.
    Xu G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Aug; 20(6):344-9. PubMed ID: 20852442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.