These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28164798)

  • 1. Introduction to bifactor polytomous item response theory analysis.
    Toland MD; Sulis I; Giambona F; Porcu M; Campbell JM
    J Sch Psychol; 2017 Feb; 60():41-63. PubMed ID: 28164798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An introduction to mixture item response theory models.
    De Ayala RJ; Santiago SY
    J Sch Psychol; 2017 Feb; 60():25-40. PubMed ID: 28164797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures.
    Reise SP; Morizot J; Hays RD
    Qual Life Res; 2007; 16 Suppl 1():19-31. PubMed ID: 17479357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rewards of bridging the divide between measurement and clinical theory: demonstration of a bifactor model for the Brief Symptom Inventory.
    Thomas ML
    Psychol Assess; 2012 Mar; 24(1):101-13. PubMed ID: 21767026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement equivalence: A non-technical primer on categorical multi-group confirmatory factor analysis in school psychology.
    Pendergast LL; von der Embse N; Kilgus SP; Eklund KR
    J Sch Psychol; 2017 Feb; 60():65-82. PubMed ID: 28164800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The value of using test response data for content validity: An application of the bifactor-MIRT to a nursing knowledge test.
    Cai Y
    Nurse Educ Today; 2015 Dec; 35(12):1181-5. PubMed ID: 26043656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rotate and Project: Measurement of the Intended Concept with Unidimensional Item Response Theory from Multidimensional Ordinal Items.
    Doebler A; Doebler P
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(1):40-56. PubMed ID: 32772593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Bifactor Nominal Response Model Analysis of a Health Efficacy Measure.
    Johnson Preston KS; Han Z
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(2):209-226. PubMed ID: 28009585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response style analysis with threshold and multi-process IRT models: A review and tutorial.
    Böckenholt U; Meiser T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):159-181. PubMed ID: 28130934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores.
    Reise SP; Moore TM; Haviland MG
    J Pers Assess; 2010 Nov; 92(6):544-59. PubMed ID: 20954056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generalized full-information item bifactor analysis.
    Cai L; Yang JS; Hansen M
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Sep; 16(3):221-48. PubMed ID: 21534682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of health surveys: fitting a multidimensional graded response model.
    Depaoli S; Tiemensma J; Felt JM
    Psychol Health Med; 2018; 23(sup1):13-31. PubMed ID: 29544349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Optimal Design of Bifactor Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing with Mixed-format Items.
    Mao X; Zhang J; Xin T
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Oct; 46(7):605-621. PubMed ID: 36131843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robustness of Parameter Estimation to Assumptions of Normality in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model.
    Wang C; Su S; Weiss DJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):403-418. PubMed ID: 29624093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On a Generalization of Local Independence in Item Response Theory Based on Knowledge Space Theory.
    Noventa S; Spoto A; Heller J; Kelava A
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):395-421. PubMed ID: 30421075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applying Bifactor Statistical Indices in the Evaluation of Psychological Measures.
    Rodriguez A; Reise SP; Haviland MG
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 26514921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Item Response Theory True Score Equating for the Bifactor Model Under the Common-Item Nonequivalent Groups Design.
    Kim KY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Sep; 46(6):479-493. PubMed ID: 35991829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the Complexity of Item Response Theory Models.
    Bonifay W; Cai L
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(4):465-484. PubMed ID: 28426237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting measurement models in psychosomatic medicine research: a latent variable approach.
    Llabre MM; Fitzpatrick SL
    Psychosom Med; 2012; 74(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 22286856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining the underlying latent structure of the sports emotion questionnaire: Insights from the bifactor multidimensional item response theory.
    Hagan JE; Quansah F; Ankomah F; Agormedah EK; Srem-Sai M; Schack T
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1038217. PubMed ID: 36619130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.