These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28164933)

  • 1. Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation.
    Valentin O; John SM; Laville F
    Noise Health; 2017; 19(86):1-9. PubMed ID: 28164933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using auditory steady-state responses for measuring hearing protector occlusion effect.
    Valentin O; Laville F
    Noise Health; 2017; 19(91):278-285. PubMed ID: 29319012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Hu N
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of physiological noise and the occlusion effect on the measurement of real-ear attenuation at threshold.
    Berger EH; Kerivan JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jul; 74(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 6886201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices.
    Berger EH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jun; 79(6):1655-87. PubMed ID: 3522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effective masking levels for 500 and 2000 Hz bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Smyth A; Leon G
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 24121647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Hansen EE; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21926629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons of auditory steady state response and behavioral air conduction and bone conduction thresholds for infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Casey KA; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):423-39. PubMed ID: 24569693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The estimation of behavioral audiograms, auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds and auditory steady-state response (ASSR) thresholds of young adults with normal hearing].
    Szymańska A; Gryczyński M; Pajor A
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2008; 62(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 19205522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part II: Modeling the external ear, simulating bone conduction, and comparing test fixture and real-ear data.
    Schroeter J; Poesselt C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):505-27. PubMed ID: 3745683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is real-ear attenuation at threshold a function of hearing level?
    Berger EH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Nov; 78(5):1588-95. PubMed ID: 4067074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectral analysis of hearing protector impulsive insertion loss.
    Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Murphy WJ; Stergar ME
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):13-21. PubMed ID: 27885881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.
    Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):274-279. PubMed ID: 27762257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pure tone audiometry with and without specific ear protectors.
    Rodrigues de Faria CA; Suzuki FA
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2008; 74(3):417-22. PubMed ID: 18661017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of multi-channel auditory steady-state response in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Chen PR; Hsu CJ; Wu HP
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jan; 123(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 18452631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.