These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28165152)

  • 1. Memory Errors in Alibi Generation: How an Alibi Can Turn Against Us.
    Crozier WE; Strange D; Loftus EF
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jan; 35(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 28165152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigator Sensitivity to Alibi Witness Inconsistency after a Long Delay.
    Price HL; Dahl LC
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jan; 35(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 28233336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The (Un)reliability of Alibi Corroborators: Failure to Recognize Faces of Briefly Encountered Strangers Puts Innocent Suspects at Risk.
    Charman SD; Reyes A; Villalba DK; Evans JR
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jan; 35(1):18-36. PubMed ID: 27757984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Altruistic Lying in an Alibi Corroboration Context: The Effects of Liking, Compliance, and Relationship between Suspects and Witnesses.
    Marion SB; Burke TM
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jan; 35(1):37-59. PubMed ID: 28008653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alibis: Generation, Consistency, Corroboration, Believability, and Detection - Introduction to this Special Issue.
    Sauerland M
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jan; 35(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 28418181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Partners under Pressure: Examining the Consistency of True and False Alibi Statements.
    Sakrisvold ML; Granhag PA; Mac Giolla E
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jan; 35(1):75-90. PubMed ID: 28247431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating investigators: how presentation order influences participant-investigators' interpretations of eyewitness identification and alibi evidence.
    Dahl LC; Brimacombe CA; Lindsay DS
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):368-80. PubMed ID: 18810615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the psychology of confessions: does innocence put innocents at risk?
    Kassin SM
    Am Psychol; 2005 Apr; 60(3):215-28. PubMed ID: 15796676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cumulative Disadvantage: A Psychological Framework for Understanding How Innocence Can Lead to Confession, Wrongful Conviction, and Beyond.
    Scherr KC; Redlich AD; Kassin SM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Mar; 15(2):353-383. PubMed ID: 32027576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imagining a false alibi impairs concealed memory detection with the autobiographical Implicit Association Test.
    Dhammapeera P; Hu X; Bergström ZM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Jun; 26(2):266-282. PubMed ID: 31556646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lost proof of innocence: The impact of confessions on alibi witnesses.
    Marion SB; Kukucka J; Collins C; Kassin SM; Burke TM
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Feb; 40(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 26301711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eyewitness identification evidence and innocence risk.
    Clark SE; Godfrey RD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):22-42. PubMed ID: 19145007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Psychology of Confessions: A Review of the Literature and Issues.
    Kassin SM; Gudjonsson GH
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2004 Nov; 5(2):33-67. PubMed ID: 26158993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of multiple show-ups on eyewitness decision-making and innocence risk.
    Smith AM; Bertrand M; Lindsay RC; Kalmet N; Grossman D; Provenzano D
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Sep; 20(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 24820149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statements from Youth in Legal Contexts: Effects of Consistency, Legal Role, and Age.
    Molinaro PF; Malloy LC
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):139-59. PubMed ID: 27021412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facts only the perpetrator could have known? A study of contamination in mock crime interrogations.
    Alceste F; Jones KA; Kassin SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 44(2):128-142. PubMed ID: 32162950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of estimator variables in eyewitness identification.
    Semmler C; Dunn J; Mickes L; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Sep; 24(3):400-415. PubMed ID: 29389161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt.
    Pearson JM; Law JR; Skene JAG; Beskind DH; Vidmar N; Ball DA; Malekpour A; Carter RM; Skene JHP
    Nat Hum Behav; 2018 Nov; 2(11):856-866. PubMed ID: 30931399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why confessions trump innocence.
    Kassin SM
    Am Psychol; 2012 Sep; 67(6):431-45. PubMed ID: 22545597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.