198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28165328)
21. Qualitative FDG PET Image Assessment Using Automated Three-Segment MR Attenuation Correction Versus CT Attenuation Correction in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study.
Lyons K; Seghers V; Williams JL; Sorensen JI; Paldino MJ; Krishnamurthy R; Rohren EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):652-8. PubMed ID: 26295654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of three methods for delineation and attenuation estimation of the sinus region in MR-based attenuation correction for brain PET-MR imaging.
Lindén J; Teuho J; Teräs M; Klén R
BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Mar; 22(1):48. PubMed ID: 35300592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Subject-specific bone attenuation correction for brain PET/MR: can ZTE-MRI substitute CT scan accurately?
Khalifé M; Fernandez B; Jaubert O; Soussan M; Brulon V; Buvat I; Comtat C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7814-7832. PubMed ID: 28837045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Deep-JASC: joint attenuation and scatter correction in whole-body
Shiri I; Arabi H; Geramifar P; Hajianfar G; Ghafarian P; Rahmim A; Ay MR; Zaidi H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Oct; 47(11):2533-2548. PubMed ID: 32415552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Region specific optimization of continuous linear attenuation coefficients based on UTE (RESOLUTE): application to PET/MR brain imaging.
Ladefoged CN; Benoit D; Law I; Holm S; Kjær A; Højgaard L; Hansen AE; Andersen FL
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(20):8047-65. PubMed ID: 26422177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Scatter Correction with Combined Single-Scatter Simulation and Monte Carlo Simulation Scaling Improved the Visual Artifacts and Quantification in 3-Dimensional Brain PET/CT Imaging with
Magota K; Shiga T; Asano Y; Shinyama D; Ye J; Perkins AE; Maniawski PJ; Toyonaga T; Kobayashi K; Hirata K; Katoh C; Hattori N; Tamaki N
J Nucl Med; 2017 Dec; 58(12):2020-2025. PubMed ID: 28646012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Brain partial volume correction with point spreading function reconstruction in high-resolution digital PET: comparison with an MR-based method in FDG imaging.
Ibaraki M; Matsubara K; Shinohara Y; Shidahara M; Sato K; Yamamoto H; Kinoshita T
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Aug; 36(8):717-727. PubMed ID: 35616808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Atlas-guided non-uniform attenuation correction in cerebral 3D PET imaging.
Montandon ML; Zaidi H
Neuroimage; 2005 Mar; 25(1):278-86. PubMed ID: 15734362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Independent brain
Armanious K; Küstner T; Reimold M; Nikolaou K; La Fougère C; Yang B; Gatidis S
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(3):179-186. PubMed ID: 31587027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Voxel-based comparison of state-of-the-art reconstruction algorithms for 18F-FDG PET brain imaging using simulated and clinical data.
Vunckx K; Dupont P; Goffin K; Van Paesschen W; Van Laere K; Nuyts J
Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 102 Pt 2():875-84. PubMed ID: 25008958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Combined PET/MR imaging in neurology: MR-based attenuation correction implies a strong spatial bias when ignoring bone.
Andersen FL; Ladefoged CN; Beyer T; Keller SH; Hansen AE; Højgaard L; Kjær A; Law I; Holm S
Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():206-16. PubMed ID: 23994317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Patient motion effects on the quantification of regional myocardial blood flow with dynamic PET imaging.
Hunter CR; Klein R; Beanlands RS; deKemp RA
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1829. PubMed ID: 27036580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Improved frame-based estimation of head motion in PET brain imaging.
Mukherjee JM; Lindsay C; Mukherjee A; Olivier P; Shao L; King MA; Licho R
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2443. PubMed ID: 27147355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification errors in MR imaging-based attenuation correction.
Mehranian A; Zaidi H
J Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 56(4):635-41. PubMed ID: 25745090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Improving PET/MR brain quantitation with template-enhanced ZTE.
Delso G; Kemp B; Kaushik S; Wiesinger F; Sekine T
Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():403-413. PubMed ID: 30010010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Comparison of activity expression between PET using 68Ge-68Ga line source attenuation correction and PET-CT using CT attenuation correction: impact on emission images].
Hayashi E; Iwase M; Kojima S; Nishio M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Jun; 62(6):832-9. PubMed ID: 16799411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Postinjection transmission scanning in myocardial 18F-FDG PET studies using both filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction.
van der Weerdt AP; Boellaard R; Knaapen P; Visser CA; Lammertsma AA; Visser FC
J Nucl Med; 2004 Feb; 45(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 14960632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. No clinically relevant differences between positron emission tomography (PET) reconstructions based on low-dose or contrast-enhanced CT in combined integrated multiphase (18) F-Fluorethylcholine PET/CT for prostate cancer.
Behrendt FF; Lensing C; Keil S; Mottaghy FM; Verburg FA
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Aug; 60(4):498-505. PubMed ID: 27297449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. MR-based attenuation correction using ultrashort-echo-time pulse sequences in dementia patients.
Cabello J; Lukas M; Förster S; Pyka T; Nekolla SG; Ziegler SI
J Nucl Med; 2015 Mar; 56(3):423-9. PubMed ID: 25678486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of standard-dose vs low-dose attenuation correction CT on image quality and positron emission tomographic attenuation correction.
Krishnasetty V; Bonab AA; Fischman AJ; Halpern EF; Aquino SL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Apr; 5(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 18359446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
