These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28165328)

  • 21. Qualitative FDG PET Image Assessment Using Automated Three-Segment MR Attenuation Correction Versus CT Attenuation Correction in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study.
    Lyons K; Seghers V; Williams JL; Sorensen JI; Paldino MJ; Krishnamurthy R; Rohren EM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):652-8. PubMed ID: 26295654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of three methods for delineation and attenuation estimation of the sinus region in MR-based attenuation correction for brain PET-MR imaging.
    Lindén J; Teuho J; Teräs M; Klén R
    BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Mar; 22(1):48. PubMed ID: 35300592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Subject-specific bone attenuation correction for brain PET/MR: can ZTE-MRI substitute CT scan accurately?
    Khalifé M; Fernandez B; Jaubert O; Soussan M; Brulon V; Buvat I; Comtat C
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7814-7832. PubMed ID: 28837045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Deep-JASC: joint attenuation and scatter correction in whole-body
    Shiri I; Arabi H; Geramifar P; Hajianfar G; Ghafarian P; Rahmim A; Ay MR; Zaidi H
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Oct; 47(11):2533-2548. PubMed ID: 32415552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Region specific optimization of continuous linear attenuation coefficients based on UTE (RESOLUTE): application to PET/MR brain imaging.
    Ladefoged CN; Benoit D; Law I; Holm S; Kjær A; Højgaard L; Hansen AE; Andersen FL
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(20):8047-65. PubMed ID: 26422177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Scatter Correction with Combined Single-Scatter Simulation and Monte Carlo Simulation Scaling Improved the Visual Artifacts and Quantification in 3-Dimensional Brain PET/CT Imaging with
    Magota K; Shiga T; Asano Y; Shinyama D; Ye J; Perkins AE; Maniawski PJ; Toyonaga T; Kobayashi K; Hirata K; Katoh C; Hattori N; Tamaki N
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Dec; 58(12):2020-2025. PubMed ID: 28646012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Brain partial volume correction with point spreading function reconstruction in high-resolution digital PET: comparison with an MR-based method in FDG imaging.
    Ibaraki M; Matsubara K; Shinohara Y; Shidahara M; Sato K; Yamamoto H; Kinoshita T
    Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Aug; 36(8):717-727. PubMed ID: 35616808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Atlas-guided non-uniform attenuation correction in cerebral 3D PET imaging.
    Montandon ML; Zaidi H
    Neuroimage; 2005 Mar; 25(1):278-86. PubMed ID: 15734362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Independent brain
    Armanious K; Küstner T; Reimold M; Nikolaou K; La Fougère C; Yang B; Gatidis S
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(3):179-186. PubMed ID: 31587027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Voxel-based comparison of state-of-the-art reconstruction algorithms for 18F-FDG PET brain imaging using simulated and clinical data.
    Vunckx K; Dupont P; Goffin K; Van Paesschen W; Van Laere K; Nuyts J
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 102 Pt 2():875-84. PubMed ID: 25008958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Combined PET/MR imaging in neurology: MR-based attenuation correction implies a strong spatial bias when ignoring bone.
    Andersen FL; Ladefoged CN; Beyer T; Keller SH; Hansen AE; Højgaard L; Kjær A; Law I; Holm S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():206-16. PubMed ID: 23994317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patient motion effects on the quantification of regional myocardial blood flow with dynamic PET imaging.
    Hunter CR; Klein R; Beanlands RS; deKemp RA
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1829. PubMed ID: 27036580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improved frame-based estimation of head motion in PET brain imaging.
    Mukherjee JM; Lindsay C; Mukherjee A; Olivier P; Shao L; King MA; Licho R
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2443. PubMed ID: 27147355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification errors in MR imaging-based attenuation correction.
    Mehranian A; Zaidi H
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 56(4):635-41. PubMed ID: 25745090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improving PET/MR brain quantitation with template-enhanced ZTE.
    Delso G; Kemp B; Kaushik S; Wiesinger F; Sekine T
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():403-413. PubMed ID: 30010010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Comparison of activity expression between PET using 68Ge-68Ga line source attenuation correction and PET-CT using CT attenuation correction: impact on emission images].
    Hayashi E; Iwase M; Kojima S; Nishio M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Jun; 62(6):832-9. PubMed ID: 16799411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Postinjection transmission scanning in myocardial 18F-FDG PET studies using both filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction.
    van der Weerdt AP; Boellaard R; Knaapen P; Visser CA; Lammertsma AA; Visser FC
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Feb; 45(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 14960632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. No clinically relevant differences between positron emission tomography (PET) reconstructions based on low-dose or contrast-enhanced CT in combined integrated multiphase (18) F-Fluorethylcholine PET/CT for prostate cancer.
    Behrendt FF; Lensing C; Keil S; Mottaghy FM; Verburg FA
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Aug; 60(4):498-505. PubMed ID: 27297449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. MR-based attenuation correction using ultrashort-echo-time pulse sequences in dementia patients.
    Cabello J; Lukas M; Förster S; Pyka T; Nekolla SG; Ziegler SI
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Mar; 56(3):423-9. PubMed ID: 25678486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of standard-dose vs low-dose attenuation correction CT on image quality and positron emission tomographic attenuation correction.
    Krishnasetty V; Bonab AA; Fischman AJ; Halpern EF; Aquino SL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Apr; 5(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 18359446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.